Rightwinggranny is adding some guest writers to the website this year. The opinions expressed by these writers are not necessarily the opinions of rightwinggranny.
Adding Perspective To October 7th
Reply
On Wednesday, Ed Morrissey at Hot Air posted an article about the impact of October 7th on the idea of the two-state solution for Israel and Palestine.
In the article, he quotes an article posted by Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib writes at The Free Press:
As the grim third anniversary of October 7 befalls a decimated Gaza Strip, the state of the discourse among many in the so-called “pro-Palestine” movement remains as embarrassing, dismal, and disastrous as it was when Hamas initiated the attack in 2023. Over the past three years, I have seen countless posts by self-described Zionists criticizing the conduct of Israel’s government, the behavior of Israeli officials, and the excesses of the Israeli reaction to October 7. And yet, I have struggled to see even a dozen posts by “pro-Palestine” activists, advocates, or organizations explicitly condemning Hamas for triggering the most catastrophic chapter in contemporary Palestinian history.
…But I will also forever be furious at the fact that Gaza would still be standing had Hamas simply kept its terrorists at home on October 7. I will forever be rageful at the fact that Hamas not only weaponized every aspect of Gaza’s infrastructure but also held Israeli hostages in a manner that was inevitably going to invite more devastation and suffering for Palestinian civilians. I will forever be resentful of the useful idiots who ignored Hamas’s sadistic tactics, hiding behind vacuous appeals to “international law” despite there being no legal framework to justify a terrorist group entrenching itself in medical facilities, educational spaces, markets, and areas meant to shelter the displaced.
The article concludes:
The only genocide at hand in Gaza is the one Hamas plotted for Israel and the Jews, and which it launched on October 7, 2023. Gazans may or may not support Hamas now, but they celebrated it as a national victory three years ago, and not a single Gazan did anything to free or assist the 250-plus hostages Hamas hid among them. This war is their war, and just because that war went badly for them does not absolve them of responsibility for it.
This is the Nakba that Palestinians suffered because they created it – and that’s been true of every Nakba since 1948.
One of the major casualties of October 7th was the idea that there could be a two-state solution and that a Palestinian state would live peacefully beside Israel.
Please follow the link to read the entire article. It contains a lot of insight.
Something To Remember
On Tuesday, American Greatness posted an article about the odd alliance between the Islamists and Communists (the red-green alliance). We are seeing that alliance in action in America right now with the Democrat Socialists of America and some of their Islamist candidates. But the Islamists and the Democrats actually have little in common in their overall philosophies. The Democrats support gay rights, the Islamists kill homosexuals by throwing them off rooftops or hanging them from cranes. The Democrats encourage women’s rights, the Islamists deny even basic rights to women. Their common goal is to overthrow the system in place. But what happens after they overthrow the existing system?
The article reports:
If political alliances were based primarily on shared values, these two movements should be enemies, not allies.
History tells us otherwise.
Iran in 1978 offers perhaps the clearest example. Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi saw an extraordinary coalition forming against his government. He described it as an alliance of “black reaction and red terror”—black representing the Shia clerical forces, red the communists and revolutionary left.
The CIA dismissed the possibility.
Then came 1979. The Shah fell, Ayatollah Khomeini returned to Tehran, and the Islamic Revolution seized power. Iran’s communist Tudeh Party embraced the revolution and supported Khomeini.
What happened next matters even more.
Once secure in power, Khomeini turned against his former allies. In 1983, the regime launched a sweeping crackdown on the Tudeh Party. Its leaders were arrested; members and sympathizers were imprisoned, executed, or driven into exile. A party that had helped welcome the revolution was ultimately destroyed by it.
The article notes:
The left believed Khomeini and the clerics were merely one component of a broad revolutionary coalition and that, after the Shah’s fall, competing factions could continue struggling over the revolution’s direction. Khomeini’s followers, meanwhile, could use the left’s organizational networks, intellectual influence, and street power.
Each side thought it was using the other.
Then the common enemy disappeared. What remained was a power struggle, won by the faction that was more ruthless, better organized, and less constrained by liberal rules.
That is the recurring logic of revolutionary coalitions. Fundamental contradictions can be postponed while a common enemy remains. Once that enemy disappears, yesterday’s allies begin reaching for their knives.
Which is why a recently recirculated video of American left-wing streamer Hasan Piker deserves attention. Piker talks about bringing a Chinese-style Cultural Revolution into the Democratic Party, subjecting establishment Democrats such as Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to “struggle sessions,” and even putting political opponents in prison.
Please follow the link to read the entire article. It is a picture of what could happen in America.
For great insight into life in Iran before, during, and after the revolution in 1979, I recommend the book A TIME TO BETRAY by Reza Kahlili. He supported the revolution, joined the Revolutionary Guard, and eventually went to work for the CIA.
A Step In The Right Direction
On Tuesday, The Daily Caller posted an article about a fraud prevention program put in place in the Treasury Department in 2026. The obvious question is why wasn’t this done long ago.
The article reports:
The U.S. Treasury announced the successful implementation of fraud prevention programs across the Department in 2026 protecting a significant amount of taxpayer money.
On Monday, the Treasury Department confirmed it had screened over 1.1 billion federal payments totaling $3.7 trillion dollars and identified 13,500 fraudulent payments worth $175 million that would have gone to deceased individuals, according to its Tuesday press release.
“Treasury continues to transform how the federal government protects taxpayer dollars by using better data, stronger controls, and advanced technology to stop fraud and improper payments before money goes out the door,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in the release. “In the past year alone, Treasury built and deployed new safeguards.”
The article concludes:
Through the Do Not Pay program, the government analyzed and screened 2.3 billion records through the Public Assistance Reporting Information System (PARIS), according to the department’s Monday press release.
The Treasury implemented these programs in coordination with President Donald Trump’s March 2025 Executive Order 14249, “Protecting America’s Bank Account Against Fraud, Waste, and Abuse.”
Unfortunately, this program was implemented through an Executive Order and can be undone if the Democrats win Congress in the mid-term elections or the presidency in 2028. We not only need to elect Republicans, we need to elect Republicans who will turn Executive Orders like this into law!
Three Years Ago ‘Never Again’ Happened
From 1948 to 1967, Egypt controlled Gaza. At that time, the people living there were not clamoring for their own country–they were content to be under Egyptian control. In 1967, during the 6-day war, Israel gained control of Gaza. The majority of the population in Gaza at that time was Arabs from various countries. There was no cry for a Palestinian state during the time Egypt, Jordan, and other nations controlled the land that Israel won back in the 6-day war. Why was it, Bethlehem resident Walid Shoebat once stated, “that on June 4th,1967, I was a Jordanian and overnight I became a Palestinian?” In June 2004, the Israeli government approved Ariel Sharon’s plan for disengagement from Gaza. In 2005, that plan was carried out. Israelis were forcibly removed from their homes. The greenhouses that the Israelis had built that fed much of the country were left behind. The Israeli government believed that moving Israel out of Gaza would reduce friction between Israelis and Palestinians, as well as free up vast sums of money (then being spent on the small settler population) to advance other issues on the national security agenda. Unfortunately, that was not the way it worked out. The residents of Gaza dismantled the greenhouses, the source of economic stability in the area, and used the pipes in the greenhouses to make rockets. In 2005, Palestinians began rocket attacks on Israel. Those rocket attacks have continued. The last rocket fired from Gaza to Israel was October 7, 2025.
On October 7th, 2023, the unimaginable happened.
…IDF field observers at the Nahal Oz outpost identify two gunmen running towards the fence. They also see terrorists detonating parts of the border fence. At 6:45 a.m., system disruptions at the outposts lead to some 70 terrorists raiding the base, with more joining the murderous raid later in the morning.
In Kfar Aza, Ynet photographer Roi Idan takes the first footage of Hamas paragliders entering Israel. Minutes later, his wife, Smadar, is killed before he himself is murdered while holding his three-year-old daughter, Abigail.
Some 3,500 revelers attended the Nova music festival near Kibbutz Re’im the night before. When the first interceptions and blasts were heard, they were told to lie on the ground and protect their heads with their hands despite no sirens being triggered in the area. At 6:32 a.m., party organizers announced the event had ended and called on everyone to leave. Most left towards the car park.
The Jerusalem Post reports that at 6:50:
Hundreds of terrorist invaders begin entering Israeli towns, from terrorists on jeeps seen driving through Sderot to infiltrations of Be’eri, Kissufim, Ofakim, and Nahal Oz. By 7:20 a.m., an emergency standby squad of the kibbutz near the Erez crossing identifies some 20 terrorists making their way towards the kibbutz.
A traffic jam ensues at the exit from the Re’im festival area as only one route, Route 232, leads out of the car park. Terrorists who infiltrated the Gaza Strip and saw the movements of cars in the area opened fire at the vehicles shortly before seven, barring the exit. Hostages were taken on the scene.
The attack continues:
9:00: Ronen Engel is killed by terrorists while attempting to defend his family. His body is taken to the Gaza Strip. At 9:26 a.m., Ronen’s wife, Karina, is taken captive, while their two daughters, Mika and Yuval, are taken captive.
9:06: An Israeli woman is killed by rocket debris in Tel Aviv, marking the first death on October 7 that did not occur in the South.
9:30: Terrorists begin a mass massacre and mass murder of whoever is on site of the Nova festival. 364 civilians, Israelis, and foreign nationals were horrifically murdered as videos of fleeing party-goers flooded social media. During this time, terrorists who had infiltrated Kfar Aza began massacring and kidnapping residents….
12:15: Terrorists take control of areas and homes in kibbutz Be’eri and begin to de-facto occupy much of Israel’s south and Gaza border area. In these hours, Nira Sharabi saved seven other kibbutz residents that terrorists were attempting to take captive. Nira’s husband, Yossi Sharabi, and her brother-in-law Eli are kidnapped to the Gaza Strip.
2:00: Israel’s security cabinet convenes for the first time in the day, seven-and-a-half hours after the invasion begins. In Be’eri, some 40 terrorists embedded themselves in homes, transferring the 15 hostages they had taken in the kibbutz to houses under their control.
2:17: The first group of IDF soldiers reach the site of the Nova party.
2:30: Officers from the Border Police’s YAMAM counter-terrorism unit rescue police officers who were in a police station that was surrounded and subsequently torched by Hamas terrorists.
Evidently the plan of the terrorists was to have allied terrorist groups attack Israel from the north and east. The plan was to overrun the country and achieve the Islamist goal of ‘driving Israel into the sea.’ That was the beginning of the war that began in Gaza and now has migrated to Iran, the major financial resource for all of these terrorist groups. Can you imagine what Iran would be like with a nuclear weapon? Is it a stretch to believe that Iran would share nuclear weapons with terrorist groups?
Never again happened on October 7th. We need to remember those who fought bravely to end the attack and those who were taken captive in the attack. Support for Israel is not optional–it is support for the only true democracy in the Middle East where people of all races and religions have the freedom to practice their religion and to participate in the government.
When Congress Doesn’t Listen To The Voters
I am hoping that by some miracle the Republicans maintain control of Congress (historically that is unlikely), but frankly I would like to see every Congressman who is blocking the passage of citizenship and id requirements for voters to be unelected.
On Monday, Breitbart reported:
The vast majority of Americans agree that one should have to show a valid photo ID and proof of citizenship to vote, the latest monthly Harvard-Harris survey revealed.
Contrary to the position of Democrat lawmakers, who generally disapprove of such measures, the survey found that 82 percent across the board believe there should be a requirement for an individual to present a valid ID to vote. Not only that, but there is a consensus across party lines.
The vast majority of Republicans, 95 percent, support requiring an individual to show a valid photo ID to vote, as do 73 percent of Democrats and 78 percent of independents.
The survey also asked respondents if they support or oppose requiring proof of citizenship to vote, and 79 percent across the board said they support that, while 21 percent oppose.
Again, 95 percent of Republicans support requiring proof of citizenship to vote, as well as 66 percent of Democrats and 75 percent of independents.
Further, the survey found that 72 percent support “tightening voter ID requirements for the 2026 Congressional midterm elections.” Once again, there is a majority consensus across party lines, with 92 percent of Republicans, 56 percent of Democrats, and 68 percent of independents agreeing.
There is something wrong when Congress can’t pass a law that 82 percent of Americans support.
Why It’s Good Never To Trust The Mainstream Media
On Tuesday, Newsbusters posted an article about Apple News, which (according to AI) has a diverse audience, with a slight majority being female (51.27%) and a significant portion of users aged 55 to 64 years. AI also notes that the platform primarily features content from left-leaning sources, which may influence the perspectives of its readership.
The article at Newsbusters reports:
Apple News, one of the most influential digital news aggregation apps, failed to promote stories about one of the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) largest financial crises in its history despite the national implications of the matter.
The DNC’s cash-on-hand balance is currently less than its total debt, which has varied between $15 million and $18 million in recent months, primarily due to a loan secured with its headquarters as collateral. The financial woes at the DNC stand in stark contrast to its political rival, the Republican National Committee, and its sister organizations, the NRSC and NRCC, which most recently disclosed that they collectively had more than $230 million in the bank and no debt.
The DNC’s multimillion-dollar debt, much of which stems from former Vice President Kamala Harris’s failed presidential campaign in 2024 and is the largest debt it has faced since 2016, is also one of its most embarrassing financial crises, raising questions about party leadership, financial management and the fallout from the 2024 campaign.
It’s interesting to me that the DNC’s debt problems began not only after the Kamala Harris campaign, but also after USAID money was stopped.
The article notes:
The financial struggles of the DNC began after Vice President Kamala Harris plowed through $1.5 billion in her failed presidential campaign in 2024. Her campaign left the DNC with an enormous debt of $20.5 million, prompting the committee to take out a $15 million loan in October 2025 to support its efforts in the off-year elections for the governors of Virginia and New Jersey. But despite the respective victories in those elections, the DNC kicked off 2026 with $17.5 million in debt, as reported by the left-wing New York Times.
The staggering debt, coming ahead of what the DNC itself billed as the “critical midterm elections,” served as a major sign of political struggle for the party, according to several news outlets. The last time the party was in this much debt was in February 2014, when it reported owing nearly $16 million.
…Apple’s omission of the Democrats’ monetary woes is particularly striking because Apple News’ top stories are manually curated by human editors, in contrast to competitors such as Google News and Microsoft’s MSN, which purportedly rely more on algorithmic selection. In other words, Apple’s editors passed over a major political story despite extensive coverage from outlets the news app routinely promotes. Why did it choose not to cover the DNC debt controversy? Only Apple can say.
Fiscal responsibility is not something I immediately associate with the Democrat party.
Please follow the link to read the entire article. It includes some interesting tidbits.
From my friends at Townhall:
Making Election Choices
Author: R. Alan Harrop, Ph.D.
As we approach the election, we need to focus on the realities of making sound choices, particularly in an environment of excessive media bias. One of the primary issues that the Democrats are focused on almost exclusively is “affordability.” Here is the main point I want to make. There is a world of difference and significance between Identifying a problem and proposing specific solutions for that problem. Anyone can easily identify a problem, but the real issue is what they are going to do about it. That should be what guides our decisions in the voting booth.
Let’s first address inflation as a symptom of affordability. Inflation is, to a large extent, caused by the massive national debt. During President Trump’s first term, the average yearly inflation was 2.46%, which historically speaking was at or near the 2.0% target of the Federal Reserve. In 2025, the first full year of his second term, the yearly inflation was 2.7%. Compare these figures to the average inflation during the Biden administration, which was about double at 5%, including a year when it was over 9%. President Trump inherited high inflation from the Biden administration and has cut it nearly in half in less than two years. Does that mean the price of most things have gone down? No, because once higher prices occur, they rarely go down. The most we can hope for is that the rate of increase is slowed. Now, while continuing to use inflation as a weapon against the Republicans, what strategies are the Democrats offering to reduce inflation? Actually, none. In fact, is it rational to trust the Democrats who gave us much higher inflation to actually be able to reduce it? Not really.
How about the price of gasoline and diesel? The price of gasoline was actually higher during most of the Biden administration. In order to fool people, Biden drained the Petroleum Reserve to flood the market and bring down the price of fuel artificially. The Petroleum Reserve was established for emergencies like war and natural disasters, not to manipulate the price of fuel! What did the Democrats actually do about gas and diesel during the Biden administration? They shut down numerous refineries, creating an inability to process crude oil into gasoline and diesel. They shut down oil pipelines, making access more expensive and limited. They implemented electric vehicle mandates, prohibited drilling on national lands, and enacted other measures to reduce fuel supplies. Are these the people you trust to lower fuel prices? Absolutely not. Also, remember that the higher prices of diesel fuel have nothing to do with the conflict with Iran and everything to do with Ukraine and Russia attacking each other’s refineries.
What about housing prices? During the Biden administration, the average cost of a new house increased from $400,000 to $500,000 an unheard-of increase of $100,000. During Trump’s first term the average price of a new home only went up by $29,000. Due to all the unwarranted spending by the Biden administration, the inflation rate drove the mortgage rates from 3.5% under Trump to over 6%. The unfettered illegal immigration under Biden, estimated to be 20 million people, increased the demand for housing, also resulting in higher prices. Is it rational to think that the Democrats will lower housing costs? Absurd.
What about taxes? The Trump administration and the Republican Congress passed the largest tax cut in modern history, including no taxes on tips, overtime and social security benefits. This has resulted in a large increase in take home pay. This tax cut was opposed by the Democrats. Which party is more likely to reduce the size of government and lower taxes? You know the answer!
What about job growth? The majority of jobs added during the Biden administration were government jobs, which of course require you the taxpayer to foot the bill. During the past few months, over 1.1 million private sector jobs were added as a result of Trump’s policies–like tariffs and returning manufacturing to this country where it belongs. The Trump administration just announced plans for a private company to build the largest steel manufacturing plant in the country in Omaha. No more depending on imports of essential items. In contrast, President Biden caused the shutdown of many manufacturing plants by putting in place excessive regulations which caused the plants to more overseas. You choose what you think is best for the country. Easy call for me.
We are in the midst of an economic boon compared to any other country; the stock market is up, and 401ks are growing instead of shrinking like under sleepy Joe. Yes, gas prices are higher than we would like. Those prices should be coming down as the Strait of Hormuz is back to pre-conflict shipping levels Do not throw the baby out with the bath water! Get out and vote to keep the economy growing. Do not turn it back to the Democrats who know nothing about economics.
The Impact Of Removing USAID
In July 2025, the US Agency for International Development (USAID) was shut down. The repercussions of that shutdown keep on coming. I know it is simply an incredible coincidence, but since the USAID money stopped flowing this past year, five right-wing leaders have been elected in South America. Also, Democrat campaign coffers are significantly lower than Republican campaign coffers. Hmm.
On Sunday, PJ Media posted an article about the recent election in Brazil.
The article reports:
Folks, this is nothing short of amazing. For the last year leading up to the presidential elections in Brazil, the little socialist dictator Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has been leading the polls, and while that lead has tightened in recent months, it still showed that Lula would likely get more votes than his closest competitor, Flávio Bolsonaro.
Well, the polls were wrong. As I write this around 8 p.m. Eastern Time on Sunday night, 99% of the reporting is in, and Flávio came out on top, with 47.24% compared to Lula’s 44.91%.
It’s close, but it’s a far better outcome than anyone predicted. Early in the night, it looked as if Flávio could win the election outright. He had something like 51% of the vote, and a candidate needs 50% to win without a runoff, but the more conservative states reported faster, and that number came down a bit. So the race will, indeed, lead to a runoff on October 25, but it’s looking very likely that Flávio will win, and Brazil will turn to the right, just as numerous other Central and South American countries have done over the last few years.
That would be huge for any number of reasons. Donald Trump and Marco Rubio will have a new ally in the region — one that will likely join the Shield of the Americas and help fight the cartels and other criminal groups that plague the Americas. It will also be a huge economic win — Brazil has the largest economy in Latin America. Best of all, it will isolate the few remaining socialists in the region, such as Mexico’s Claudia Sheinbaum. And the pressure on Cuba and Nicaragua will also likely grow.
The article concludes:
São Paulo, the biggest state, reelected Tarcísio de Freitas, former President Jair Bolsonaro’s former infrastructure minister, for governor with about 63% of the vote. Minas Gerais, the second biggest, elected Cleitinho Azevedo, a Bolsonaro ally, with about 55% of the vote. Sérgio Moro, the judge who once sent Lula to prison, won Paraná on Bolsonaro’s party line, and a former army officer allied with Bolsonaro won Rio Grande do Sul with about 58%. Santa Catarina reelected its Bolsonaro-party governor with about 68%.
Jair Bolsonaro’s wife, former first lady Michelle, won a Senate seat in the capital, Brasília. It was her first run for office, and some are saying she won more votes than any other person who filled that seat in history. Two more of Jair’s sons, plus his brother, also won various elections. It also looks like the Liberal Party, which is the party under which Flávio ran, will have the largest bloc in the Senate.
It truly looks as if we’re about to see another Latin American country reject socialism. This is historic.
Obviously, there still may be some opportunity for shenanigans, but this looks really good!
Good Economic News
On Monday, The Dallas Express posted an article with some very interesting economic numbers.
The article reports:
Private employers added 46,000 jobs in September, while government payrolls fell by 17,000. The U.S. economy gained 29,000 jobs overall, according to federal figures released Friday.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics released the figures in its September employment report. The unemployment rate edged up to 4.2% from 4.1% in August, though the agency described the change as small.
September’s net job gain followed an increase of 133,000 in August, according to revised figures. Employers added an average of 45,000 jobs a month over the preceding 12 months.
Health care added 17,000 positions in September, construction gained 11,000 and manufacturing added 9,000. BLS characterized employment changes across major industries as small.
It should also be noted that the Workforce Participation Rate, which changes very slowly, moved from 61.6 in August to 61.8 in September.
The article concludes:
Average hourly earnings for private-sector workers rose 5 cents to $37.81 in September, a 0.1% increase. Earnings grew 3% over the past year. The average workweek held at 34.4 hours.
About 7.1 million people were unemployed. Roughly 1.9 million had been unemployed for at least 27 weeks, accounting for 27.1% of the unemployed. Another 4.5 million worked part time because employers reduced their hours or they could not find full-time jobs.
As previously reported by The Dallas Express, Texas manufacturers reported stronger production and employment growth in September in a separate Dallas Fed survey.
The survey’s employment index rose from 8.0 to 15.1. That index measures the balance of manufacturers reporting increases versus decreases in staffing; it does not represent a percentage increase in jobs.
The economy is moving in the right direction!
The Terrorist Are Already Here And They Are Funding Terrorism
On Friday, PJ Media posted an article about the arrest of seven people charged with raising money for Hamas here in America.
The article reports:
A member of genocidal terror group Hamas raised money here as “charity” for the group and bragged to one of his accomplices that he has a network of friends in New York who are technically Americans but in total sympathy with terrorists.
Saleem Alzaq is a Gaza-based Hamas jihadi who helped operate a network of fake charities that funneled up to millions of dollars from donors, including Americans, back to terrorists in Gaza. Attorney General Todd Blanche announced the arrests and charges on October 2, promising to “eradicate terrorism.”
One of the accomplices reportedly referred to the previous Hamas-funding scam through the Holy Land Foundation.
If you are unfamiliar with the Holy Land Foundation trial, please use to search engine at the top of this page to learn more. I have written many articles about the Holy Land Foundation trial over the years.
The article concludes:
It is true that many leftists in New York City are delusional about Islam, but part of the reason for the Zohran Mamdani takeover is that the demographics in New York have changed radically with a huge influx of Muslims in recent years. Some data analysts believe there are even more Muslims than Jews or Irish- and Italian-Americans in New York City now. The picture at the top of this article is from Brooklyn. America is the great melting pot, but the Muslim religion is explicitly antithetical to religious freedom, equality under the law, ethnic harmony, and so many of the other principles that Americans value.
To be a devout Muslim, one has to believe in killing the infidels — or at bare minimum treating them as second-class citizens. And Alzaq’s network was certainly proud of gulling American infidels to fund jihad.
Please follow the link to read the entire article. It’s time to deport people who choose not to assimilate into American culture (or those who want to kill us and put in Sharia Law).
A Common-Sense Approach To Homelessness
On Saturday, Legal Insurrection posted an article about Health and Human Services Secretary (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s plan to deal with homelessness.
The article reports:
Health and Human Services Secretary (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced Friday that eight communities will receive $96 million under a new federal program that breaks sharply with the “Housing First” orthodoxy that defined homelessness policy for the past decade. Each recipient will get $3 million a year for four years, starting with treatment, not housing placement.
The venue was Open Door in Houston. It started with a shelter and soup kitchen in 1954. Now its description reads: “Christ-centered recovery refuge for men in crisis.” A Christian organization working with homeless men and helping them through addiction.
Kennedy announced the Safety Through Recovery, Engagement, and Evidence-based Treatment and Support (STREETS) grants there Friday. In his statement, he said treatment would go directly to people living on the streets. He also drew a sharp contrast with what preceded it:
“STREETS takes treatment directly to Americans living on our streets and connects them to the care and support they need to recover. Under President Trump, we will no longer accept a system that manages human suffering instead of ending it. We are helping people reclaim their health, rebuild their lives, and achieve the dignity, purpose, and independence that come with recovery.”
There have been people who temporarily were homeless due to job losses or family situations that have successfully gotten off of the streets, but the odds are very much against that. Trying to solve homelessness while ignoring the root problems has never worked. Many of the homeless are military veterans suffering from Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) who need help dealing with PTSD in order to get them off of the streets. Other homeless have severe drug problems or psychological problems that need to be solved in order for them to get off of the streets. It makes sense to deal with the mental issues rather than simply providing a place to stay.
The article concludes:
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s (SAMHSA’s) chief of staff, Timothy W. Westlake, said people needing care should not be left to figure out which agency can help them:
“People who are homeless and struggling with serious mental illness or addiction should not have to navigate fragmented systems alone. We are organizing systems around recovery instead of asking people in crisis to organize themselves around systems.”
HHS tied the grants to Trump’s executive order on ending crime and disorder on America’s streets. They also support Great American Recovery, co-chaired by Kennedy and White House addiction recovery adviser Kathryn Burgum.
The eight recipients now have $12 million each to work with over four years. Spending it will be easy enough. Keeping someone in care after that first visit takes work. Kennedy has said managing the suffering is no longer good enough. Taxpayers should hold the grant recipients to it.
This is good news.
Ignoring The Constitution
According to AI, the Constitution explicitly prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections, as it designates voting rights to citizens only. While states manage their own election processes, federal laws reinforce this restriction, ensuring that non-citizens cannot participate in elections for federal offices. AI further notes that 18 U.S. Code § 611 prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections. You would think a judge would know that.
On Friday, Breitbart posted an article about a judge in Florida who claims a federal ban on noncitizens voting is unconstitutional. What constitution is he reading?
The article reports:
U.S. District Judge David Leibowitz, appointed to the bench by Joe Biden in 2024, threw out a case against Chelsea Michelle Ann Cox, who knowingly voted despite being a noncitizen in Broward County in 2020.
In his 31-page opinion, Leibowitz claimed that the U.S. Congress overstepped its role by passing a law prohibiting noncitizens from voting because in his view the Constitution maintains that the states are to determine voter eligibility.
Section 2 of the 14th Amendment reaffirms the right of all citizens to vote. Nowhere in any of America’s laws do non-citizens have the right to vote in federal elections. Some localities have given non-citizens the right to vote in local elections, but not in federal elections.
The article concludes:
But Leibowitz claims that the law is a violation of Article I, Article II, and the 17th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
“When you’re prosecuted based on a law that Congress did not have the authority to pass, the prosecution cannot stand,” he wrote in his opinion.
Federal prosecutors maintain that congressional powers over immigration gives Congress the right to exclude noncitizens from voting. Prosecutors also maintain that a 1970 Supreme Court case validating a law by Congress lowering the voting age to 18 also shows precedent that Congress has the right to affect voting rules in federal elections.
Aside from the legal question, is there any country in the world that allows non-citizens to vote in its elections?
Let’s Pass This Bill In The House Of Representatives
On Thursday, The Epoch Times posted an article about Senate Bill S.4009, the Falun Gong and Victims of Forced Organ Harvesting Protection Act.
The article reports:
A bill tackling systematic forced organ harvesting in China is now headed to the House after getting the Senate green light on Sept. 28.
S.4009, with support from 12 bipartisan sponsors, passed the Senate with unanimous consent.
Dubbed the Falun Gong and Victims of Forced Organ Harvesting Protection Act, the bill addresses an issue that is gaining growing attention in the United States.
In the past, I have written three articles about China’s practice of taking organs from unwilling donors (here, here, and here). The practice has been going on for some time, and it is encouraging that the American Congress may actually take a stand against it.
The article notes:
As early as 2006, whistleblowers raised the alarm about the abuses taking place in China under Beijing’s auspices.
In 2019, the London-based China Tribunal concluded a year-long investigation into the issue. Forced organ harvesting, it found, had taken place in the country for years “on a significant scale.” A major victim group is practitioners of Falun Gong, according to the tribunal ruling.
The tribunal also said Uyghur Muslims were at risk while being detained in “re-education camps” in China’s Xinjiang. More than 1 million Muslims have been held in internment camps in the region, the U.S. government said.
Falun Gong, a spiritual practice with meditative exercises based on the principles of truthfulness, compassion, and tolerance, drew an estimated following of 70 million to 100 million people in China during the 1990s. It has faced harsh suppression since 1999, when the Chinese Communist Party initiated a nationwide persecution in 1999 to wipe it out.
Survivors from both campaigns have recounted arbitrary arrests, forced labor, and grueling torture in prison.
Meanwhile, China’s organ transplant industry continues to grow, drawing patients from all over the world with waiting times as short as days—compared with possibly years in the West.
The article explains what the bill does:
The bill would sanction foreign individuals for carrying out or facilitating the abuse, barring them from entering the United States and blocking them from having U.S. transactions. Those violating the sanctions risk facing up to $250,000 for a civil offense, or $1 million and 20 years in prison in criminal penalties.
It also directs the State Department to conduct an investigation with input from the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, the director of the National Institutes of Health, and the relevant heads of the intelligence community.
Within a year of the bill’s passage, the secretary of state would report to Congress about China’s organ transplantation practices and policies. The report would assess whether the Chinese regime conducts systematic forced organ harvesting and look into where the organs are from, how fast they are obtained, and whether that timetable is practical in the country.
This is a bill that needs to be passed quickly.
We Need To Protect Our Northern Border As Well As Our Southern Border
On September 25, Front Page Magazine posted an article about Muslims transporting kidnapped teenagers across the Canadian border with America.
The article reports:
There’s been a great deal of focus on our border with Mexico, less so on the Canadian border, in part because of the sheer size of it and also because it hasn’t been as ‘hot’. But many of the incidents that we’ve had on the border have involved Muslims including two plots, one of which targeted LAX airport, and there seems to be a growing number of cases of Muslims transporting kidnapped teens across the border.
Sault Ste. Marie Police say two men are facing kidnapping charges after Canada Border Services Agency officers caught them attempting to cross back into Canada with a 15-year-old they had refused to let go.
Police say 40-year-old Sahan Alam of Sault Ste. Marie and 29-year-old Hasan Al-Mamun of Sudbury were arrested the night of September 19 after CBSA officers at the Sault Ste. Marie port of entry noticed the teenager in their vehicle and flagged it as a suspected kidnapping. Officers were called to the border crossing just after 10:15 p.m. and took both men into custody.
According to the official police release, “on September 19, 2026, detectives with Investigation Services charged 40-year-old Sahan Alam of Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, and 29-year-old Hasan Al-Mamun of Sudbury, Ontario, with kidnapping after an interception by Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) officers. An investigation revealed the two accused had picked up the youth earlier that day and would not allow them to leave the vehicle.”
…While the police are claiming that this was an isolated incident, except there seems to have been another recent incident involving an Afghan.
We need to make sure that the people we are bringing into America share the values of western culture. The corruption and sexual perversion that goes on in Muslim countries does not need to be imported into America.
Forgetting The Lessons Of Economic History
On Thursday, Issues & Insights posted an article about a Wall Street Journal survey that indicates that Americans have not yet learned the economic lessons of the past.
The article reports:
A new poll shows widespread support for a return to 1970s-style stagflation. Well, not exactly. But most people these days support the very policies that produced the wreckage of that decade.
George Santayana was right. “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” Unfortunately, this group now includes people such as the current vice president who claim to be conservative.
A new Wall Street Journal survey finds that “Americans in both parties back government-imposed price caps and other market interventions to make life more affordable.”
Significant majorities (more than 70%) also support caps on prescription drugs, credit card interest rates, and child care costs. Sixty-one percent back a wealth tax on millionaires, nearly 60% favor socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders’ government takeover of healthcare, known as “Medicare for all,” and 57% want to raise the minimum wage to $20 an hour.
Our own I&I/TIPP survey found a shockingly high number of adults support the idea of the government owning key industries. (See: “POLL SHOCKER: Socialism Is Infecting The GOP As Well.”)
The article concludes:
But now we have nationalist “conservatives” and party leaders like JD Vance, the putative successor to Donald Trump, treating the free market as an evil that must be tamed, and extolling the virtues of government interventions, also “for the greater good.” Vance has even taken to bashing Milton Friedman (saying it’s a good thing his ideas aren’t driving economic policy these days) and Margaret Thatcher, while praising Sen. Huey Long, “who advocated socialist policies and ran Louisiana as his authoritarian fiefdom,” in the words of Unleash Prosperity.
What’s next? Calls to re-regulate the airline industry? Slapping price controls on oil and gas? The return of wage and price controls? The rebirth of New Deal programs and FDR’s economically ruinous “bold, persistent experimentation”? Once you give up on the free market, there is no end to the mischief.
We know where this all leads. And it’s not a road that makes America great again. Just ask anyone who still can remember what times were like when Jimmy Carter was president.
Those of us who remember Jimmy Carter don’t EVER want to do that again.
Milton Friedman once said, “If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there’d be a shortage of sand.” If you want the economy to grow, keep the government out of it as much as possible.
They Are Doing Their Job
On Wednesday, Breitbart posted an article about some of what the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has been doing under the Trump administration.
The article reports:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Recovery Asset Team has denied more than $1 billion in attempted cyber theft since January 2025, which is a 16 percent increase over the same period under the previous administration, the bureau told Breitbart News on Thursday.
The article notes:
The intelligence chief said older Americans make up the bulk of the victims. The bureau has referred 99 victims for suicide intervention, seized 584 scam websites, and sent 7,670 fraudulent accounts to private companies for action, according to Fox News Digital.
In May, the bureau reported a then-record $8 billion cryptocurrency seizure and 275 arrests in Dubai, where authorities said nine raided compounds each generated about $6 million a year in fraud. An August raid at Cambodia’s roughly 200-acre O’Smach Resort compound involved searches of 28 buildings over three days.
The announcement follows earlier FBI cyber actions Patel has detailed in his weekly updates. In June, the bureau reported that FBI Cleveland disrupted a Chinese phishing platform linked to nearly $1.9 billion in losses worldwide under Operation Riptide. In April, the FBI and Justice Department announced a scam-center takedown charging two Chinese nationals, restraining about $700 million in cryptocurrency, and seizing 503 websites.
Americans filed more than one million cybercrime complaints in 2025 for the first time in the FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center’s history, reporting $20.9 billion in losses, with adults 60 and older accounting for $7.7 billion.
This article should serve as a warning to those of us who lived most of their lives before the cyber age. Never give out any personal or banking information to anyone unless you are sure the person you are talking to or texting actually works for the company they claim to represent. If a deal sounds too good to be true, it probably is. It has taken the elderly their whole lives to accumulate whatever wealth they have; they need to protect it by listening to their local law enforcement scam alerts and by thinking carefully before giving any personal information to anyone.
From my friends at Power Line Blog:
A Deal That Makes Sense
On Thursday, Just the News posted an article about a steel mill to be built in southeast Iowa. The article explains that “Iron ore from the company’s newly opened mine near Nashwauk, Minnesota — described by the administration as the first new U.S. iron ore mine in 50 years — would move downriver and be turned into finished steel in Iowa.” America controls the manufacturing plant and the mine that supplies the material–brilliant!
That article reports:
Trump, standing in the Oval Office with Essar executives and Iowa Republicans, cast the deal as proof that raising the cost of imported metal is pulling plants onto American soil, an important message for lower and middle income Americans who have lower consumer confidence due in part to perceived high gas prices. The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index fell by 6.7 points to 81.9 (1985=100) in September, down from 88.6 in August.
References to prices, the high cost of goods and services, and oil and gas prices in particular, rose to new heights, reflecting September’s surge in fuel costs.
The article notes:
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick did not treat the mill as a coincidence. He tied it directly to the administration’s Section 232 steel duties, which Trump raised to a staggering 50% last year. Under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, Lutnick initiated investigations to determine the effects of imports on national security.
“These are your 232 tariffs, the steel tariffs at work. Without those tariffs, this mine and steel plant doesn’t get built,” Lutnick said, arguing the United States has leaned too long on imported pellets, including from Brazil. “Now we are unleashing the Iron Range in Minnesota. You go right down the Mississippi to Iowa, where they get to build a $15 billion integrated steel plant.”
Trump made the same case in plainer language, saying the domestic industry is “roaring back to life” because companies “don’t want to pay tariffs.” The administration’s theory is straightforward: if imported steel is more expensive, the math for building a mine-to-mill chain inside the United States starts to work. Lutnick said that is “exactly your plan, because you’re driving steel to America.”
The tariffs are bringing manufacturing back to America. They are also putting large amounts of money into the Treasury. The courts need to be quiet–they are standing in the way of making America fiscally secure.
Misleading, But Informative
On Wednesday, The Daily Signal posted an article about the Senate voting down a bill that would have banned insider trading by Congressmen. They gave various excuses for voting down the bill, but voting down the bill had nothing to do with insider trading–but the bill was combined with a nationwide voter ID mandate. That is what the Senate Democrats really were voting against.
The article reports:
The bill failed 53-to-47 along party lines. The bill, which originated in the House and was sponsored by Rep. Bryan Steil, R-Wis., would prohibit members of Congress and their spouses and dependent children from purchasing stocks. The measure would also require public notice before these individuals could sell stocks.
In July, HR 7008 passed the House 232-198, with 218 Republicans and 13 Democrats voting “yes,” along with one independent. A total of 198 Democrats voted “no.” Rep. Frederica Wilson, D-Fla., did not cast a vote.
The act was bound to fail in the Senate due to its being combined with a nationwide voter ID mandate, which Democrats vehemently opposed. Rep. Joe Morelle, D-N.Y., described the voter ID provision as a “poison pill” during the House debate, arguing that it would suppress millions of voters by imposing unnecessary restrictions.
After the vote, Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., wrote on X, “Senate Democrats blocked a bill to stop any sort of insider trading by government officials and to require legal ID to vote. North Dakotans overwhelmingly support both these measures, yet when it came time to vote, Democrats said no.”
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., also posted on X following the vote, saying, “EVERY Senate Democrat just joined EVERY House Democrat in voting AGAINST banning congressional stock trading. @RepBryanSteil’s Stop Insider Trading Act is the accountability the American people demand. But every Democrat blocked it from becoming law.”
Why are the Democrats so strongly against voter ID laws? In today’s computerized society, everyone needs an ID to do anything–bank, board an airplane, buy beer, buy cigarettes, etc. Also, states with voter ID offer free ID’s for people who may not have a driver’s license or other form of ID.
The only reason for opposing voter ID is to make it easier to cheat. Do you still trust the Democrats to support election integrity?
The Unemployment Numbers
Although somehow the media is neglecting to report it, the Trump economy is doing very well.
On Thursday, Just the News posted an article about the unemployment numbers for the week ending September 26.
The article reports:
The number of people applying for unemployment benefits fell last week to the lowest level since mid-July, according to the latest data from the Labor Department.
For the week ending Sept. 26, the seasonally adjusted initial jobless claims fell to 197,000, a drop of 1,000 from the previous week.
The four-week moving average was 200,000, which was a decrease of 2,500 from the previous week’s revised average, the Labor Department said.
Unemployment claims are a proxy indicator for layoffs, and they signal to economists where the job market is headed. So far this year, claims have remained below 220,000, which is a historic low.
According to AI, “in 2024, the GDP of the United States is projected to grow at an annual rate of approximately 2.4 percent, reflecting a robust economic performance despite global challenges.” The predicted Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth for the third quarter of 2026 is 2.8 percent. Why did 2.4 percent reflect a robust economic performance while the media is suspiciously quiet about 2.8 percent growth?
Much of the media is reporting that consumer confidence is down in September. Might that be the result of the fact that the mainstream media is not reporting the successes of the Trump economy? The media plays a major role in how people perceive the economy. If the media reporting is favorable, people believe the country is doing well. If the media reporting is favorable and someone gets laid off, they assume that their situation is unique. If the reporting is negative and a person has a good job, they assume that they are the exception rather than the rule. It’s time Americans stopped listening to the mainstream media reports of the economy–the mainstream media is manipulating–not reporting.
An Interesting Legal Question
On Thursday, The Federalist posted an article about a lawsuit that is going to have an impact for beyond the state it is filed in.
The article reports:
On Sept. 17, the American Freedom Law Center filed a landmark lawsuit on behalf of a Dearborn, Michigan, resident, alleging that the Arab-majority Detroit suburb, led by Muslim officials, has promoted Islam and discriminated against and fostered hostility towards Christians and Jews — in violation of the Constitution’s establishment clause.
The details of the case brought by my courageous colleague, Federalist Senior Legal Correspondent Margot Cleveland, are shocking. She alleges that Dearborn’s leaders have endorsed glitzy Ramadan displays and advertised an iftar dinner with public funds. Conversely, they have allegedly ignored Cleveland’s requests for comparable commemorations for Christian and Jewish holidays and sidestepped concerns over public rallies glorifying jihadism. They have also berated a Christian pastor and fellow constituent. Dearborn Mayor Abdullah Hammoud called Pastor Ted Barham a “bigot” and “Islamophobe” who “is not welcome here” when he questioned the city’s renaming of a city street for an avowed Hamas and Hezbollah supporter.
The complaint cites past instances where courts have found the city to have discriminated against non-Muslims.
The article notes:
The suit claims that “acts, customs, policies, practices, and/or procedures that favor Muslims and discriminate against Christians and Jews” reflect the mayor’s “message … that Christians and Jews are not welcome … and are, indeed, second-class citizens.” [Emphasis added.]
Islam is a proselytizing religion. To bring the world under Allah’s command, it calls for employing means including persuasion, subversion, coercion, and violent jihad. Allah’s rule takes the form of sharia law, governing not only religious practices but all aspects of life, public and private. Sharia abides neither freedom of religion nor speech, brooks no dissent, subjugates women and minorities, and imposes a host of illiberal rules.
Islam does not preach coexistence with non-Muslims. It preaches subjugation. The tenets of Islam, such as Sharia Law, are incompatible with America’s Constitution. One of the basic tenets of Islam is that non-Muslims should either be killed or relegated to being second-class citizens who pay a yearly tax to live. This is NOT a religion–it is a political movement, and it is a mistake to give Islam a foothold anywhere in America.
The Company You Keep…
On Wednesday, Legal Insurrection posted an article about a recent appearance by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand at a Muslim event.
The article quotes The Washington Free Beacon:
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand wore a hijab during a visit last week to a Bronx mosque where the powerful New York Democrat sat alongside a cleric who once celebrated Hamas for “causing so much trouble for the Jews” and has hailed Osama bin Laden’s spiritual mentor.
Gillibrand, who chairs the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, appeared at the Bronx Muslim Center, located in New York City’s “Little Yemen,” on Sept. 21, according to photos posted by the center’s outreach director. The photos show Gillibrand wearing a pink headscarf and seated next to Hamud Alsilwi, a Yemeni cleric who has led the Bronx Muslim Center since 1998.
…The Bronx mosque is a branch of the Muslim American Society, which federal prosecutors have described as an “overt arm” of the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States.
Alsilwi has praised Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood and hailed Sheikh Abdul Majeed al-Zindani, an influential Islamic scholar designated as a terrorist over his ties to bin Laden.
The article notes:
As noted earlier, Gillibrand is far from the only prominent elected female Democrat in New York who has taken this approach. We also saw this from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) during a May event designed “to celebrate the start of Eid al-Adha (the Muslim religious holiday that honors the importance of unwavering faith, submission, and charity).” With a heavy emphasis for women in particular on “submission,” no doubt.
Wearing a hijab is not simply a courteous or religious act. It is giving credence to the idea that women are inferior creatures with no rights. It is a visual representation of the subservience of women in Islam. At some point, Americans need to realize that the goal of Islam is not to coexist within America–it is to conquer America and put in place Sharia Law. I guess the feminist movement has somehow failed to notice what the role of women is in an Islamic society.
From my friends at Lucianne.com:
I Guess Fox News Is Now Part Of The Mainstream Media
On Tuesday, Just the News posted an article about a recent hire at Fox News.
The article reports:
Fox News has hired a former aide of Andrew Cuomo who admitted to covering up deaths at nursing homes in New York state during the COVID pandemic.
Melissa DeRosa will be a contributor and co-host of a new podcast, “The Girls,” set to air beginning Oct. 1., according to a Fox News Media press release.
DeRosa worked for Democratic New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s administration. She admitted on a conference call with Democratic lawmakers that the Cuomo administration hid the number of deaths at nursing homes, fearing it would be politicized by Cuomo’s political opponents, including President Donald Trump, the Daily Caller reported.
This was not just some casual cover-up–this was a cover-up that had to do with the life and death of the people involved. For whatever reason, Governor Cuomo has never been held responsible for the deaths that resulted in moving people supposedly recovered from Covid into nursing homes. We also remember that Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Rachel Levine faced scrutiny when she moved her mother out of a personal care facility shortly after she implemented a policy directing Pennsylvania’s nursing homes and certain care facilities to admit recovered COVID-19 patients who were treated at nearby hospitals. It seems that the people in power were aware of the danger. There was very little information concerning the point where a person who had had Covid was no longer contagious, and extreme caution would have been appropriate.
I question the wisdom of hiring someone to co-host a podcast who has a history of hiding important information from the media.