Burn Bags

By now everyone who actually keeps up with the real news is familiar with the revelation of the FBI burn bag discovery. Director Patel “found” a “hidden” closet full of evidence of the conspiracy to deny PDJT of both his election and the ability to function during his first term. Destruction of evidence is itself a crime. Who ordered it? Who is the hero of the Republic that refused to burn the evidence?

What few excerpts from the lamestream news that have been inflicted upon me seem to report is mainly gaslighting as to the importance of the evidence and a return to this being a continuing effort to deny the conspiracy in the first place.

A few have denied that this is a “smoking gun.” This isn’t a “smoking gun,” it is a conflagration in an arsenal. The only thing left to be included is video tape of the whole pack of cockroaches laughing and discussing what they are doing.

All of the expected participants are documented, even Barry Obozo. The only sad part is that it will be difficult to indict Obozo. But the rest are fair game, including Pencil-Neck Schiff. Apparently, a few have figured it out and are lawyering up. Smart move.

Someone – yet to be revealed – realized that felonies were being committed at the highest level. And like “Deep Throat” during the Watergate debacle, he or she decided that the Constitution and the Law were actually put in place to either prevent or prosecute such actions.

PDJT describes this plot to be treasonous. I concur. Watergate was a coverup of a penny ante burglary. This is the attempt to coverup deliberate evidence tampering – Shillery’s emails plus an attempt to invalidate a national election, as well as disrupting the entire efforts of a duly elected president.

Watergate was spiking the punch at a Baptist wedding. This is a political 911. While the just desserts are being served to the miscreants involved, it does provide a tasty treat for those who have been anxiously awaiting this process.

Prison time is certainly justified for all of the players. Can treason actually be proved? Since this is being started in a south Florida jurisdiction, it has a much better chance than if it were to be played out in DC. Treason is serious. The previous DOJ would likely have taken a charge of treason and negotiated it down to jaywalking. But this DOJ is more likely to deliver perp walking instead. (Yes, I’m giddy at the prospect!)

The difficulty in indicting Obozo is that he was in office at the time. Was conspiring to commit treason a valid duty of the president? I expect that he would say yes. A difficult decision for someone. And yes, I’ve made up my mind. A decade or two in Leavenworth seems appropriate.

So, if he can’t be indicted for his crimes what might be his just desserts? IF the Republicans in Congress have the cojones – and that is a BIG IF – he can be subpoenaed to appear before a congressional committee and required to address the evidence. He can’t be forced to testify but watching him plead the fifth over and over will still be entertaining. Presenting page after page of incriminating evidence while he squirms might be all we can expect. But that will provide ample entertainment for some. (I wonder if this will wipe the smirk off of Peter Strzok’s face?)

But what it can do is to reveal to the world the real legacy of Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama. A lying, conniving, conspiring, treasonous Marxist who would gladly commit major felonies to keep the Marxist party in power.

As for his legacy – light it up.

ciao,

The Snark