Author: R. Alan Harrop, Ph.D.
We are frequently told “The experts say….” with the implication that we should trust the so-called “experts” who know better than we do. The question is, “How is that working out?” Logically, it seems to make sense to trust the opinion of those people who theoretically know more about a topic than we do. This is especially true in our increasingly complex and technical society.
A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, United States v. Skrmetti, refuted the argument raised by the plaintiffs (advocates for transgender altering medication and surgery on children) that lawmakers in Tennessee should go along with the experts when writing legislation and making law. In the 6 to 3 majority opinion, the judges ruled that the legislators in Tennessee had the right to enact a law abolishing gender-altering medication and surgery, regardless of the opinion of so-called experts such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the American Psychological Association. According to the court, the common-sense wisdom of the people should take precedence over groups of experts. This was a decision of historic importance since it reasserted the principle of government by the people– not by some elite group.
Looking back over the recent past reveals numerous instances where the experts have been proven to be wrong. A far reaching and dramatic example is the experts who have been claiming that the earth’s climate will undergo devastating, irreversible warming if we do not cease burning fossil fuels. Turns out that all these predictions were founded on unproven data and mere speculation about the future. Computer models were used by the environmental extremists rather than verifiable scientific facts. Nevertheless, a large percentage of the expert worshipers went along, forcing us to demolish the greatest most economical source of energy in favor of expensive, unreliable solar and wind power generation.
A more mundane example was the expert’s war on the consumption of eggs that started in the late 1970s. We were told that eating eggs would raise deadly cholesterol causing an epidemic of heart disease. The fact that no definitive scientific proof existed at the time to validate this warning did not seem to matter to the experts. They knew what was best for us, and like a bunch of sheep, many of us just followed along. Recent evidence appears to show that not only does eating eggs not increase the risk of heart attacks, it may actually reduce the levels of LDL, the so-called bad cholesterol. I have not heard any of the experts apologize for the misinformation about eating eggs.
There are many other examples of the experts being wrong which lead to the question of why? How can this be the case? One factor is that many experts are not merely accumulators of facts, but already have a bias towards one side of an issue. Funding of research is frequently provided by organizations and corporations that stand to benefit from a particular outcome. For example, millions of Americans are taking statin medications to lower cholesterol and hopefully reduce the likelihood of a heart attack. The evidence for this is not as definitive as most of us would like, but the prescribing of statins certainly helps Big Pharma.
It is past time to listen to the advice of experts with a healthy level of skepticism. Wisdom is not a function of the number of degrees a person has accumulated. We must take upon ourselves the ultimate responsibility for decisions that affect our lives and not rely solely on experts. Fortunately, we live in an era where a great deal of information is readily available on the internet. We must trust our own judgement and weigh the facts and the sources of the information. We should have the courage to stand up to such absurd notions that a child can alter their gender despite the genetic differences imposed by nature. Of course, public education and universities staffed with extreme Leftists are a major source of much of the indoctrination we see in our society. This influence must be counter balanced by reasoned conservative staff and teachers to provide a balanced perspective. The common sense of the people must be allowed to manifest itself and not be controlled by over deference to the experts.