The Constitutional Power of the Executive 

Author:  Pastor Daimon – CCTA Chaiman

*Facebook post: “This country is currently in a Constitutional crisis; Who is in authority, the President or the judges?

*My response: “We the People!” Then, the President carries forth the power of the people.

This conversation was provoked due to US Federal and District Court judges attempting to interfere with President Trump’s mass deportation of illegal aliens. Title 50, Chapter 3 of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 makes that very clear, that the President’s authority is law, especially in the time of deporting illegal aliens. US Code 21 in Chapter 3 of Title 50 makes it clear that the Constitutional Executive Power of the President is unchallenged. He is the Commander in Chief and the Chief Executive.

US Code 21 – ‘Restraint, Regulation and Removal.”

Only Congress has the power to deliberate with the President in a war-time act ONLY in a “declaration of war” against another nation, unless our boarders have been breached by invaders, such as illegal aliens and foreign gangs that have been classified as terrorist organizations. In this case, the President has the authority to act on his own to protect the nation. This is the “Constitutional Power of the Executive.”

No district or federal court judge has the authority to stop or hinder the operations of the President. The US Supreme Court is the highest judiciary in the land. They are the ONLY ones that can be a part of the President’s acts and orders with regard of domestic issues…only as petitioned by Congress. Deporting illegal aliens is an act of international intervention as they are considered foreign invaders of US territory. And, due to the fact that many of them have been ordered by their governments to invade the US by illegally breeching our boarders, it is now legally considered an act of war. Those groups deemed terrorists that have brought violence and death upon the citizens of the United States of America, are foreigners who are attacking America on American soil. This is deemed an “act of war!” Therefore, the Commander In Chief has the full Executive Authority to enforce US Code 21 – Restraint, Regulation, and Removal, and dispose of these invaders UNIMPEDED by any judge or courts, US Supreme Court included. US Code 23 in Chapter 3 under Title 50 makes it clear that the judiciary is responsible to comply with the President in His removal of these invaders.

US Code 23 – “Jurisdiction of the United States Courts and Judges.”

US Code 24 in Chapter 3 of Title 50 – “Duties of Marshalls.”

Marshalls are to be in cooperation with the judiciary who are to recruit the Marshalls in compliance to the President’s US Code 21 operation. This is just a small insight into the Constitutional Power of the Commander in Chief in His Presidential responsibilities in regards to removal of illegal aliens and other illegal, boarder breeching invaders. Remember, the President’s primary, responsibility as Commander in Chief is to protect the citizens of the United States of America! Those who harbor and protect the invaders can be and shall be impeached, prosecuted and charge with treasonous crimes against the Constitution of the United States of America!

The Past Actions Of Judge James Boasberg

History predicts the future. When you look at some of the cases that Judge Boasberg has been involved with in the past and his decisions, the fact that he is doing everything he can to prevent President Trump from carrying out his campaign promises should not be a surprise.

In an article posted at director blue’s substack account on Thursday, Doug Ross reminds us of the judge’s history:

1. Blocking Trump’s Use of the Alien Enemies Act (2025)

2. Ordering Deportation Planes to Return (March 2025)

3. Conflict with Trump Administration Over Deportation Flights

4. FISA Court Role in Carter Page Surveillance (2014-2021)

5. Light Sentence for Kevin Clinesmith (2021)

6. Hiding Archey Declarations (2018) (high-profile government misconduct case)

7. Ruling on Clinton Emails (2016)

8. Dakota Access Pipeline Shutdown (2020)

9. Jan. 6 Grand Jury Oversight (2023)

10. Mike Pence Testimony Order (2023) (narrowed scope of executive privilege)

11. Ray Epps Probation Sentence (2024) (unusually lenient sentence)

12. FISA Court Presiding Judge During FBI Criticism (2020-2021)

13. Osama bin Laden Photos Ruling (2012)

14. Asylum Seeker Detention Limits (2018)

15. Medicaid Work Requirements Block (2019)

16. Alleged Bias in Jan. 6 Cases

17. Trump Impeachment Threats (2025)

18. Conflict of Interest Allegations (family connections to immigration NGOs)

19. Observation of Trump’s Court Appearance

20. Historical Precedent Rejection (2025)

For further details, follow the link above to read the entire article.

If I had gone judge shopping for someone to oppose President Trump’s policies, this would have been a judge I seriously considered. His track record is not one of rulings that represent equal justice under the law.

The article concludes:

It is time that:

(a) President Trump strips Boasberg of his security clearances for his FISA abuse failures;

(b) Congress compels his testimony regarding his conflicts of interest, his longstanding political activism, and years of failing to adhere to the Code of Conduct for United States Judges.

Congress should impeach him, but with a divided Congress, that is unlikely.