The Conservative Treehouse is reporting today that a Michigan judge has lifted a gag order allowing the plaintiff, Allied Security Operations Group, to publicly release the findings of a forensic report of Antrim County Dominion vote tabulation systems. The article includes a full pdf of the findings for those computer geeks who actually understand what went on.

The article includes the following highlights from the audit:

“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.

The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud.

Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.

[…] The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.

[…] It is critical to understand that the Dominion system classifies ballots into two categories, 1) normal ballots and 2) adjudicated ballots. Ballots sent to adjudication can be altered by administrators, and adjudication files can be moved between different Results Tally and Reporting (RTR) terminals with no audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicates (i.e. votes) the ballot batch.

[…] A staggering number of votes required adjudication. This was a 2020 issue not seen in previous election cycles still stored on the server. This is caused by intentional errors in the system. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency or audit trail. Our examination of the server logs indicates that this high error rate was incongruent with patterns from previous years.

The statement attributing these issues to human error is not
consistent with the forensic evaluation, which points more correctly to systemic machine and/or software errors. The systemic errors are intentionally designed to create errors in order to push a high volume of ballots to bulk adjudication.

[…] Research is ongoing. However, based on the preliminary results, we conclude that the errors are so significant that they call into question the integrity and legitimacy of the results in the Antrim County 2020 election to the point that the results are not certifiable.

Because the same machines and software are used in 48 other counties in Michigan, this casts doubt on the integrity of the entire election in the state of Michigan.” (source)

We are at a crossroad. There is a lot of evidence that the 2020 presidential election was not a fair election. We have two choices. We can either move on with the understanding that if cheating is successful once, it will happen again, or we can deal with the problem of a dishonest election either by voting again in the states where there was cheating (with a much better eye on what is going on) or by turning the election over to the state legislators. Whatever the outcome of this election, a lot of people are going to be unhappy. The difference is that only one side will be inclined to riot and cause civil unrest. The fear of riots and civil unrest may have been the reason for the Supreme Court refusing to hear the Texas case.