Editing With A Purpose

There are times in television or radio that an interview has to be edited to fit into a specific time. That happens frequently. There are other times when an interview or news article is edited to give a specific impression that may or may not be accurate or unbiased. The most recent example of this is the editing done by “60 Minutes” of the interview with Kamala Harris. Word salads were edited to make them sound like intelligent remarks.

On Wednesday, The Gateway Pundit reported:

This is the definition of election interference.

Apparently, Kamala’s interview with 60 Minutes was much worse than we first thought.

Fake news 60 Minutes was caught editing Kamala’s answers to make her sound coherent and normal.

In fact it was so bad that ’60 Minutes’ spliced her nonsensical answer and replaced it with a completely separate sentence she said earlier in the interview.

Here is the actual exchange:

Bill Whitaker: But it seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening?

Kamala Harris: Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region.

And here is ’60 Minutes” edited exchange:

Bill Whitaker: But it seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening?

Kamala Harris: We are not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end.

Buyer beware when in comes to believing what you hear in the mainstream media.

Videos of the actual answer and the edited answer are posted in the article. Please follow the link to watch the video.