The Unintended Consequence Of Cash For Clunkers

On Wednesday, Ed Morrissey at Hot Air posted an article about the impact of Cash for Clunkers on the current used car market.  Because of the number of used cars destroyed as a result of the Cash for Clunkers program, used cars are scarcer and more expensive.

The article cites the impact of the program on some used car prices:

    • Cadillac Escalade – 35.6% increase
    • Chevy Suburban – +34.2%
    • Dodge Grand Caravan – +34%
    • BMW X5 – +33%

Generally speaking, people who buy used cars buy them because they are less expensive than new cars.  A quality used car will last almost as long as a new car and be cheaper to buy.  I live in Massachusetts, where the excise tax on a new car is considerably more than the tax on a used car.  I bought a new car in February.  In addition to the sales tax on the car, I paid a personal property tax of over $500.  Had I bought the same car a year old, that cost would have been closer to $200 or $300. 

The article concludes:

“As predicted last year, the people most hurt by the price increases are those who can least afford them.  The used-car market usually attracts people who need transportation on a budget, who cannot afford to buy new.   By destroying a quarter’s worth of trade-ins in three weeks and permanently taking them off the market, the Obama administration has forced an artificial inflation by supply restriction.  Moreover, they did so by subsidizing new-car sales that would have occurred anyway, eating up three billion dollars in taxpayer money.

“In other words, the White House spent $3 billion to make used cars more expensive for working-class families.  Nice work.”

This is another example of government interference in the free market.   When the government gets involved, there are always unintended consequences.