The Right To Form A Union

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Today's Boston Herald posted a story stating that Martha Coakley told a group of teamsters in Watertown yesterday that she was planning to support the "Express Carrier Protection Act," which would allow FedEx to unionize.  Currently, FedEx falls under the Railway Labor Act and which does not allow its workers to form unions.

Just off the top of my head, it seems to me that FedEx is doing a pretty good job of delivering packages.  As far as I know, people have the choice to work for FedEx or not to work for FedEx and when anyone takes a job there, they are aware that they are not part of a union.  Frankly, I see nothing to be gained by unionizing FedEx, and since FedEx is based in Memphis, Tennessee, not Massachusetts, I wonder why unionizing it is being brought up in the Massachusetts Senate race.

I might mention at this point that FedEx is not unionized and the Post Office is unionized.  The Post Office is also a private delivery service (it is no longer government run), and the contrast in efficiency is rather obvious.

 

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: The Right To Form A Union.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.rightwinggranny.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1531

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Granny G published on January 16, 2010 10:20 AM.

The Boston Globe Occasionally Gets It Right was the previous entry in this blog.

Thank You! Thank You! Thank You! is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.