My favorite climate-change information site, wattsupwiththat.com, has the story on the memo leaked by the Office of Management and Budget showing that Carbon Dioxide has 'no demonstrated direct health effects'. Whoops! The memo states:
"An EPA finding last month that greenhouse gases are a danger to public health rests on dubious assumptions and could have negative economic impacts, a memo from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) warned.
The memo has no listed author but is marked "Deliberative-Attorney Client Privilege." A spokesman for OMB told Dow Jones Newswires that the brief is a "conglomeration of counsel we've received from various agencies" about the EPA finding, the conclusions of which would trigger regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.
The author(s) of the memo suggest the EPA did not thoroughly examine the relationship between greenhouse gases and human health.
"In the absence of a strong statement of the standards being applied in this decision, there is concern that EPA is making a finding based on...'harm' from substances that have no demonstrated direct health effects," the memo says, adding that the "scientific data that purports to conclusively establish" that link was from outside EPA."
If there is no danger from Carbon Dioxide, why regulate it or tax it? Please follow the link to the entire article. There is a video and a chart to add to the discussion!!
There are qualitys that should negative skip in a bestessays.com.au reviews. The initial is a club of pro poets coupled accompanying pro editors furthermore proofreaders. The resulting thesis over by this club resolution definitely be splendid.