If It's So Good, Why Aren't You Willing To Have A Full Debate?

| | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)

Today's New York Times reports that the Obama Administration will use the "reconciliation" procedure on its health care program in order to get it through the Senate without it being filibustered.  This is not a good idea.  The changes the Administration proposes are drastic, and the public needs to be aware of the specifics so that they can weigh in with their Congressmen.  According to the article:

"Senator Kent Conrad of North Dakota has advised using against reconciliation, saying it does not lend itself to such a complex issue as health care. But he came under intense pressure from the White House, his own leadership and the House to agree to include it."

What happened to the transparency that the Obama Administration promised?  Where are the details of the new health care program posted so that the American people can see what the program is?

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: If It's So Good, Why Aren't You Willing To Have A Full Debate?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.rightwinggranny.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/761

2 Comments

I came over the duration ‘bestessay au’ in an didactic article besides I was puzzled. The slab did negative dictate many different about this interval, obviously presumptuous we many recognize what it imports. Satisfy decipher what this is besides how we can inscribe or wear it.

I really enjoy simply reading all of your weblogs. Simply wanted to inform you that you have people like me who appreciate your work. dentiste a terrebonne

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Granny G published on April 24, 2009 8:43 PM.

How Do You Properly Handle A Terrorist? was the previous entry in this blog.

Do We Really Need To Do This? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.