Social Security is known as the third rail of politics. Any politician threatening to do anything to it will probably not get re-elected. However, some changes need to be make if the program is to survive.<\/p>\n
On Sunday, The New York Post<\/a> posted an article about the Democrats’ plan to fix Social Security.<\/p>\n The article reports:<\/p>\n Watch out: Democrats\u2019 big ideas for \u201csaving\u201d Social Security \u2014 now set to go bust in 2032 \u2014 range from lunacy like boosting <\/em>payouts to madness like job-killing tax hikes.<\/strong><\/p>\n The program\u2019s trust fund empties out in just six years, forcing automatic 22% cuts in payments, yet the Democrats who just won<\/a> control of Congress look to worsen<\/em> the outlook, throwing the system\u2019s finances<\/a> even further<\/em> out of whack.<\/strong><\/p>\n Last year, Social Security\u2019s Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance trust funds shelled out $160 billion more than they took in, red ink on track to grow to $400 billion by 2033 as the population continues to age and the ratio of workers-to-beneficiaries plunges.<\/strong><\/p>\n The article notes:<\/p>\n Cue Democratic plans to jack up taxes (and not just on the rich!) to pull in more cash.<\/strong><\/p>\n Meanwhile, other Democrats want to boost payments and offer more generous cost-of-living increases<\/a>, deepening the hole and bring doomsday closer.<\/strong><\/p>\n The cap on Social Security taxes now kicks in at $184,500 of income, rising to $192,300 next year; Dem plans to raise (or eliminate) it wouldn\u2019t hit just millionaires<\/a> and billionaires, but far more modest-income folks.<\/strong><\/p>\n Other Dem plans would keep the current cap but impose a new tax on incomes over $250,000, or create a new \u201cSocial Security\u201d levy on net investment income.<\/strong><\/p>\n Such hikes would have a brutal impact on economic growth, socking Americans whose earnings are far closer to zero than six figures and bringing far less cash than Democrats\u2019 project.<\/strong><\/p>\n Yes, if benefits are left as is, some of the tax hikes might <\/em>reduce the system\u2019s yearly deficit \u2014 but none w<\/em>ould totally eliminate it, merely pushing Insolvency Day a few years down the road yet.<\/strong><\/p>\n And hiking benefits would deepen<\/em> the problem.<\/strong><\/p>\n Stopping the fraud in Social Security would be a good first step, but not the real solution. The true basis of the problem is demographics. Fifty-plus years of abortion have greatly impacted the demographics of America. The workforce is shrinking because there are fewer Americans coming of age entering the workforce and even fewer being born. Until having children becomes a positive thing, raising Social Security taxes will only prolong the agony.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Social Security is known as the third rail of politics. Any politician threatening to do anything to it will probably not get re-elected. However, some changes need to be make if the program is to survive. On Sunday, The New … Continue reading