{"id":64083,"date":"2026-05-27T11:40:55","date_gmt":"2026-05-27T15:40:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=64083"},"modified":"2026-05-27T11:40:55","modified_gmt":"2026-05-27T15:40:55","slug":"exposing-the-obvious","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=64083","title":{"rendered":"Exposing The Obvious"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Tuesday, PJ Media<\/a> posted an article about the recent changes in the climate change narrative.<\/p>\n

The article reports:<\/p>\n

“Climate change\u2019s worst-case scenario is officially canceled,” young adult infotainment site Vox finally admitted this weekend, causing progressive heads to explode, from the writing staff to its readership.<\/strong><\/p>\n

“You\u2019ve probably never heard of the term ‘RCP 8.5’ \u2014 the highest-emission scenario used by climate scientists to project the planet\u2019s future,” Vox’s Bryan Walsh reported. “But if you\u2019ve read about climate change, you\u2019ve seen the numbers and nightmarish outcomes it produced: 4\u00b0C of warming by 2100, sometimes 5\u00b0C, sea level rising multiple feet, parts of the planet too hot for humans.”<\/strong><\/p>\n

Scary stuff, right?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Wrong.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Even though “those numbers shaped a decade and a half of climate journalism,” Walsh continued, he “didn\u2019t always know \u2014 and didn\u2019t always communicate \u2014 that the scenario behind the most apocalyptic, attention-getting findings was largely an attempt to imagine how bad things could get, not a true forecast.”<\/strong><\/p>\n

Let’s pause here a moment to contemplate what Walsh just admitted.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Walsh<\/a>:<\/strong><\/p>\n