{"id":60394,"date":"2025-08-04T15:19:02","date_gmt":"2025-08-04T19:19:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=60394"},"modified":"2025-08-04T15:19:02","modified_gmt":"2025-08-04T19:19:02","slug":"when-judges-dont-like-the-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=60394","title":{"rendered":"When Judges Don’t Like The Law"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Sunday, The Daily Caller<\/a> posted an article about the influence of the Supreme Court decision regarding federal judges trying to undermine President Trump’s agency. Basically, the Supreme Court said that they were exceeding their authority. Unfortunately, the judges have continued to ignore the Supreme Court’s ruling.<\/p>\n

The article reports:<\/p>\n

Federal judges are increasingly ruling against the Trump administration\u2019s agenda and in defiance of Supreme Court orders.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The executive branch finds itself fending off endless counter-opinions from federal judges in the courtroom as it continues to implement its hard-line immigration policies. While the Trump administration has scored major victories in the nation\u2019s highest court, including successfully reining in the scope of nationwide injunctions by federal judges, some have chosen to defy Supreme Court rulings.<\/strong><\/p>\n

U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, an appointee of the Biden administration, blocked the Trump administration on Friday from using a process known as \u201cexpedited removal\u201d to quickly remove illegal migrants from the country, according to court documents<\/a>. The order could, at least for the time being, dramatically curtail the White House\u2019s ability to carry out its deportation agenda.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In a public statement about the ruling, an administration spokesperson slammed the Biden-appointed judge, accusing her of defying a previous Supreme Court ruling.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The article concludes:<\/p>\n

The Trump administration, which has grown increasingly frustrated with \u201cactivist judges<\/a>\u201d continually undermining its agenda, scored a major victory in late June when, in a 6-3 vote<\/a>, the Supreme Court dramatically limited lower courts\u2019 ability to issue nationwide injunctions in a decision revolving around Trump\u2019s birthright citizenship order.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe injunctions before us today reflect a more recent development: district courts asserting the power to prohibit enforcement of a law or policy against anyone,\u201d Justice Amy Coney Barrett stated in the majority opinion. \u201cThese injunctions \u2014 known as \u2018universal injunctions\u2019 \u2014 likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts. We therefore grant the Government\u2019s applications to partially stay the injunctions entered below.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

The White House referred to the decision as a \u201cbig win\u201d in a press statement<\/a> shortly following the order.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

However, in the relatively short amount of time since that Supreme Court ruling, lower courts have repeatedly taken advantage of exceptions in the order that still allow them to issue nationwide injunctions. Lower courts have blocked the president\u2019s asylum ban at the southern border and barred<\/a> the White House from ending deportation protections for Haitian nationals.<\/strong><\/p>\n

A federal judge in late July<\/a> barred the Trump administration from ending birthright citizenship for the children of illegal migrants, marking the third such nationwide court ruling blocking the order since the Supreme Court ruling.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The President represents the executive branch of our government. He was elected to do a job. The judges are way outside their lane when they try to prevent the President from doing the job he was elected to do.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On Sunday, The Daily Caller posted an article about the influence of the Supreme Court decision regarding federal judges trying to undermine President Trump’s agency. Basically, the Supreme Court said that they were exceeding their authority. Unfortunately, the judges have … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1399,274,7015,18352],"class_list":["post-60394","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-immigration","tag-supreme-court","tag-the-daily-caller","tag-trump-agenda"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60394","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=60394"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60394\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60395,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60394\/revisions\/60395"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=60394"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=60394"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=60394"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}