The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says:<\/p>\n
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.<\/strong><\/p>\n This (and the other Amendments in the Bill of Rights) is intended to limit the power of the government to interfere in the rights of Americans. Notice that there is nothing in this amendment regarding limiting speech that may not be true or limiting fake news. However, there is a segment of our political class that is planning to limit speech to what they approve of.<\/p>\n On Sunday, The Conservative Treehouse<\/a> reported:<\/p>\n Within the recent WEF discussion, Secretary Kerry outlines how freedom of speech is a \u2018threat to the global democracy<\/em>\u2018 because the governing officials have a difficult time controlling information.\u00a0 Kerry goes on to posit how the next administration, presumably in his hope Kamala Harris, will forcefully structure all the tools of government to stop Americans from using the first amendment to freely speak about issues.<\/strong><\/p>\n Governing is too challenging, according to Kerry, when the government cannot stop people from seeking and discovering information that is against their interests.\u00a0 Effective governing required compliant adherence to a singular ideology.\u00a0 Against the backdrop of COVID-19 and a host of similarly related government narratives, if people are free to find alternative information and think for themselves, they become increasingly more difficult to control.\u00a0 Yes, this is said quite openly.\u00a0 This is the mindset of those in power.<\/strong><\/p>\n Admittedly, John Kerry has someone lost his influence, but he represents the ideas of a possible Harris\/Walz administration.<\/p>\n The article concludes:<\/p>\n There needs to be an open venue for all information. Unfortunately, when we begin to apply labels or categorization to information, there\u2019s an opportunity for information to be manipulated \u2013 even weaponized.\u00a0 \u00a0We are in this situation right now.<\/strong><\/p>\n Saul Alinsky spent decades pondering the best techniques to weaponize information and speech.\u00a0 Alinsky\u2019s intentions in the endeavor to change society by changing how language and information was used were not good. He devoted his completed rulebook book to Lucifer.<\/strong><\/p>\n Be careful about anyone saying we need to label or categorize information in order to control or remove a certain speaker from the discussion.<\/strong><\/p>\n You were not born with a requirement to believe everything you are told; rather, you were born with a God-given brain that allows you to process the information you receive and make independent decisions.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n COVID-19 and the subsequent government lies, have helped many people to see just how dangerous the modern political Marxists are. Those who proposed a \u201cglobal information governance board,\u201d are now on their heels and increasingly desperate.\u00a0 Hence, \u201cgoverning is now hard\u201d according to John Kerry.<\/strong><\/p>\n The flickering flame of liberty and freedom has been under assault for decades, we are at an inflection point.\u00a0 I remain optimistic in our ability to defeat those who are trying desperately to use all the mechanics of every system to retain power, for the same reason that all abusive relationships eventually have to end.<\/strong><\/p>\n It is up to the public to sort out the truth from the lies–it is not the business of government.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people … Continue reading