{"id":55359,"date":"2024-06-17T12:16:35","date_gmt":"2024-06-17T16:16:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=55359"},"modified":"2024-06-17T12:16:35","modified_gmt":"2024-06-17T16:16:35","slug":"clearing-the-way-for-deportations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=55359","title":{"rendered":"Clearing The Way For Deportations"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Friday, The Federalist<\/a> posted an article about the Supreme Court’s decision regarding a loophole that allowed foreigners to avoid deportation proceedings by citing a paperwork technicality. The decision was 5-4. That is not surprising.<\/p>\n

The article reports:<\/p>\n

The case centered on three illegal immigrants: Moris Esmelis Campos-Chaves, an El Salvador native who entered the country illegally in 2005 through Texas; Varinder Singh, a man from India who illegally entered the U.S. in 2016 by \u201cclimbing over a fence\u201d in California; and Mexico-native Raul Daniel Mendez-Col\u00edn, who illegally entered the U.S. in 2001 in Arizona.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The trio argued that their deportation notices did not meet the criteria for a proper notice as prescribed by the law.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Title 8 USC \u00a7 1229 (a) describes two types<\/a> of notices. The first is a general initial notice to appear that shall include, among other specificities, a \u201ctime and place\u201d for the proceeding. The second notice regards a \u201cchange or postponement in the time and place of such proceedings.\u201d The Supreme Court previously ruled in 2021 that \u201cthis information must be provided in a single document in order to satisfy [the law].\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

If an alien does not appear at his removal proceeding, the government has the authority to remove him. If the alien, however, can prove he did not receive the notice, he can seek to have the removal order rescinded.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Supreme Court<\/a> was technically hearing three separate cases, as one case stemmed from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that ruled in favor of the government while the other two, from the 9th Circuit, ruled in favor of the illegal immigrants.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The trio were ordered to be deported after they failed to appear at their deportation hearings. But the three illegal immigrants argued that the notices they received were improper since they initially lacked a specific date and time.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The article concludes:<\/p>\n

Surely the burden is always on the government when dealing with the rights of citizens.<\/em> But to claim that noncitizens <\/em>\u2014 in this case people who knowingly broke the law and entered the country illegally \u2014 deserve the same right as an American to absolve themselves of the burden of proof is ludicrous.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Millions of illegal immigrants have flooded our border and overwhelmed not only Border Patrol, but the court system. The idea that these \u201cnoncitizens\u201d should be allowed to stay in the country if the overwhelmed court system fails to provide a single document notifying them of their hearing is insanity.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The justices in the majority opinion were Justice Alito, Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, Justice Kavanaugh, and Justice Barrett. The justices in the minority were Justice Brown Jackson, Justice Sotomayor, Justice Gorsuch, and Justice Kagan.<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On Friday, The Federalist posted an article about the Supreme Court’s decision regarding a loophole that allowed foreigners to avoid deportation proceedings by citing a paperwork technicality. The decision was 5-4. That is not surprising. The article reports: The case … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[12870,1400,15603,102,274,11815],"class_list":["post-55359","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-5th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals","tag-deportation","tag-illegal-immigrant","tag-illegal-immigrants","tag-supreme-court","tag-the-federalist"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55359","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=55359"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55359\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":55360,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55359\/revisions\/55360"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=55359"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=55359"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=55359"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}