{"id":48861,"date":"2023-01-15T19:52:35","date_gmt":"2023-01-16T00:52:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=48861"},"modified":"2023-01-15T19:52:35","modified_gmt":"2023-01-16T00:52:35","slug":"the-constitution-provides-a-way-to-protect-gun-rights-currently-under-fire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=48861","title":{"rendered":"The Constitution Provides A Way To Protect Gun Rights Currently Under Fire"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Saturday, Breitbart<\/a> posted the following headline:<\/p>\n

The Congressional Review Act Gives GOP House Opportunity to Stop ATF Stabilizer Brace Rule<\/h1>\n

The article reports:<\/p>\n

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) announced the finalization of its stabilizer brace ban on Friday, and within hours, members of Congress were talking about using the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to block it.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The CRA was put in place in the 1990s as part of Speaker Newt Gingrinch\u2019s (R) \u201cContract with America.\u201d It\u00a0grants Congress the ability to review a major rule and vote to block the implementation or effectiveness of the rule.<\/strong><\/p>\n

…The U.S. Government Accountability Office explains<\/a>\u00a0the CRA thusly: \u201cThe CRA allows Congress to review \u2018major\u2019 rules issued by federal agencies before the rules take effect. Congress may also disapprove new rules, resulting in the rules having no force or effect.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Keep in mind that according to the Constitution, rules and laws were made in Congress and only in Congress.<\/p>\n

The article reminds us that the ATF has attempted this ban in the past:<\/p>\n

In July 2021, when the pistol brace rule was at the proposal stage, Rep. Richard Hudson (R) led\u00a0140 members of Congress<\/a> in suggesting the proposed rule was a tax on \u201cdisabled combat veterans.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Hudson called for the stabilizer brace proposal to be withdrawn, noting that the ATF had many times explained its position that such braces were \u201clegitimate\u201d:<\/strong><\/p>\n

The ATF has repeatedly stated, \u201cthe brace concept was inspired by the needs of disabled combat veterans who still enjoy recreational shooting but could not reliably control heavy pistols without assistance. Consequently, ATF agrees that there are legitimate uses for certain \u2018stabilizing braces.\u2019\u201d If this is the stance of the ATF, then\u2026[the proposed AR-pistol rule] is not an attempt to curb gun violence as suggested by this proposed guidance, but a direct tax on disabled combat veterans.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The article concludes:<\/p>\n

The Congressional Review Act is in place for moments such as this and is apropos if, in fact, the stabilizer brace ban meets all the criteria of a \u201cmajor\u201d rule.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The U.S. Government Accountability Office explains<\/a>: \u201cThe CRA allows Congress to review \u2018major\u2019 rules issued by federal agencies before the rules take effect. Congress may also disapprove new rules, resulting in the rules having no force or effect.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

A rule passed by un-elected bureaucrats who are not accountable to the voters should be immediately null and void.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On Saturday, Breitbart posted the following headline: The Congressional Review Act Gives GOP House Opportunity to Stop ATF Stabilizer Brace Rule The article reports: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) announced the finalization of its stabilizer brace … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[672,10348,267,16176,774,361,16175],"class_list":["post-48861","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-atf","tag-breitbart","tag-bureau-of-alcohol-tobacco-firearms-and-explosives","tag-congressional-review-act","tag-government-accountability-office","tag-newt-gingrich","tag-stablilizer-braces"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=48861"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48861\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48866,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48861\/revisions\/48866"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=48861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=48861"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=48861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}