{"id":48667,"date":"2023-01-01T18:56:28","date_gmt":"2023-01-01T23:56:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=48667"},"modified":"2023-01-01T18:56:28","modified_gmt":"2023-01-01T23:56:28","slug":"how-to-improve-election-integrity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=48667","title":{"rendered":"How To Improve Election Integrity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On December 30, Tom Fitton posted the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/big-election-integrity-victory\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Judicial Watch Weekly Update<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The Update reports some good news about election integrity:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>New York City Removes 441,083 Ineligible Names from Voter Rolls Thanks to Judicial Watch!<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>We just <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-valentine-settlement-03952\/\">settled<\/a> a federal election integrity lawsuit against New York City after the city removed 441,083 ineligible names from the voter rolls and promised to take reasonable steps to clean its voter registration lists in the future.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>We filed the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/nyc-voter-rolls\/\">lawsuit<\/a> in July after the city failed to clean voter rolls for years. The lawsuit, filed under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/crt\/national-voter-registration-act-1993-nvra\">National Voter Registration Act<\/a> (NVRA), pointed out that New York City removed only 22 names under federal law over six years (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/ny-board-of-elections-nvra-july-2022-complaint-03952\/\"><em>Judicial Watch v Valentine et al.<\/em><\/a> (No.1:22-cv-03952)).<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Our suit detailed how New York City\u2019s \u201cown recent data concedes that there were only 22 total\u201d removals under this provision \u201cduring a six-year period, in a city of over 5.5 million voters. These are ludicrously small numbers of removals given the sizable populations of these counties.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Moreover, the \u201calmost complete failure of Kings, Queens, New York, Bronx, and Richmond Counties, over a period of at least six years, to remove voters\u201d under a key provision of federal law \u201cmeans that there are untold numbers of New York City registrations for voters who are ineligible to vote at their listed address because they have changed residence or are otherwise ineligible to vote.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>The settlement details how the city responded to our notice about its voting roll deficiencies with a massive clean-up:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><strong>[The Board of Elections] notified Judicial Watch that, in February 2022, they removed, pursuant to Section 8(d)(1)(B) of the NVRA, 82,802 registrations in Bronx County, 128,093 in Kings County, 145,891 in New York County, 66,010 in Queens County, and 18,287 in Richmond County, for a total of 441,083 registrations.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><strong>[The Board of Elections] notified Judicial Watch that going forward they intend to cancel registrations pursuant to Section 8(d)(1(B) in each odd-numbered year in the months following a federal election.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Specifically, the city also agrees to track in detail and report its voter roll maintenance efforts through 2025:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\"><strong>For both 2023 and 2025 \u2026 the [Board of Elections] will notify Judicial Watch \u2026 on or before March 31, by means of separate excel spreadsheets for Bronx County, Kings County, New York County, Queens County, and Richmond County, of the number of removals, including removals pursuant to \u2026 the NVRA, made during the previous two years.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>The NVRA requires states to \u201cconduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove\u201d from the rolls \u201cthe names of ineligible voters\u201d who have died or changed residence. Among other things, the law requires registrations to be cancelled when voters fail to respond to address confirmation notices and then fail to vote in the next two general federal elections. In 2018, the Supreme Court confirmed that such removals are mandatory (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/17pdf\/16-980_f2q3.pdf\"><em>Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Inst<\/em><\/a>. (138 S. Ct. 1833, 1841-42 (2018)).<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>This historic settlement is a major victory for New York voters who will benefit from cleaner voter rolls and more honest elections. We are pleased that New York City officials quickly acted to remove 441,000 outdated registrations from the rolls. We look forward to working together under this federal lawsuit settlement to ensure New York City maintains cleaner rolls for future elections.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>We are a national leader in voting integrity and voting rights. As part of our work, we assembled a team of highly experienced voting rights attorneys who stopped discriminatory elections in Hawaii, and cleaned up voter rolls in California, Ohio, Indiana, and Kentucky, among <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/tag\/nvra\/\">other achievements<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Please follow the link above to read the entire post. There is some good news here about the future of America&#8217;s elections.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On December 30, Tom Fitton posted the Judicial Watch Weekly Update. The Update reports some good news about election integrity: New York City Removes 441,083 Ineligible Names from Voter Rolls Thanks to Judicial Watch! We just settled a federal election &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=48667\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2208,2640,125,3620,3075],"class_list":["post-48667","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-election-integrity","tag-judicial-watch","tag-new-york-city","tag-tom-fitton","tag-voter-rolls"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=48667"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48667\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48678,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48667\/revisions\/48678"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=48667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=48667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=48667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}