{"id":47961,"date":"2022-11-08T10:06:17","date_gmt":"2022-11-08T15:06:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=47961"},"modified":"2022-11-08T10:06:17","modified_gmt":"2022-11-08T15:06:17","slug":"things-learned-at-the-european-parliament-hearings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=47961","title":{"rendered":"Things Learned At The European Parliament Hearings"},"content":{"rendered":"

On October 24th, Technocracy<\/a> posted an article about the COVID hearing in the European Parliament.<\/span><\/p>\n

The article reports:<\/p>\n

\n

> The premise behind COVID shot mandates and vaccine passports was that by taking the shot, you would protect others, as it would prevent infection and spread of COVID-19<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

> In early October 2022, during a COVID hearing in the European Parliament, Dutch member Rob Roos questioned Pfizer\u2019s president of international developed markets, Janine Small, about whether Pfizer had in fact tested and confirmed that their mRNA jab would prevent transmission prior to its rollout<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

> Small admitted that Pfizer never tested whether their jab would prevent transmission because they had to \u201cmove at the speed of science to understand what is happening in the market \u2026 and we had to do everything at risk\u201d<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

> We\u2019ve known for well over two years that the shots were never tested for transmission interruption. In October 2020, Peter Doshi, associate editor of The BMJ, highlighted that trials were not designed to reveal whether the vaccines would prevent transmission. Yet everyone in government and media insisted they would do just that<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

It was never about science or protecting others. It was always about following a predetermined narrative that sought to get experimental mRNA technology into as many people as possible<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

If you have had the COVID vaccine and feel the need to detox from the vaccine, there is a site<\/a> that explains how to do that. I have no idea how reliable the information on the site is, but the site is open to the public.<\/p>\n

The article at Technocracy reports:<\/p>\n

February 9, 2021, I published an article that clarified the medical and legal\u00a0definitions of a \u201cvaccine.\u201d<\/a>\u00a0In the article, I noted that mRNA COVID-19 jabs did not meet those definitions, in part because they don\u2019t prevent infection or spread. In reality, they\u2019re experimental gene therapies. In July that year, The New York Times published a hit piece on me citing that February 9 article:1<\/span><\/sup><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

…Fast-forward to early October 2022, and my claims were officially confirmed during a COVID hearing in the European Parliament. Dutch member Rob Roos questioned Pfizer\u2019s president of international developed markets, Janine Small, about whether Pfizer had in fact tested and confirmed that their mRNA jab would prevent transmission prior to its rollout.<\/strong><\/p>\n

As noted by Roos, the entire premise behind COVID shot mandates and vaccine passports was that by taking the shot, you would protect others, as it would prevent infection and spread of COVID-19. Small replied:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cNo. We had to really move at the speed of science to understand what is happening in the market \u2026 and we had to do everything at risk.\u201d2<\/span><\/sup><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

As noted by Roos, \u201cThis means the COVID passport was based on a big lie. The only purpose of the COVID passport: forcing people to get vaccinated.\u201d Roos added that he found this deception \u201cshocking \u2014 even criminal.\u201d3<\/span><\/sup><\/strong><\/p>\n

Please follow the link above to read the entire article. The truth is starting to come out, and there are some very angry people out there. Many people are saying that Covid amnesty is not an option–Covid accountability is what is needed.<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On October 24th, Technocracy posted an article about the COVID hearing in the European Parliament. The article reports: > The premise behind COVID shot mandates and vaccine passports was that by taking the shot, you would protect others, as it … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[14473,11144,1283,15961],"class_list":["post-47961","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-covid-vaccine-mandates","tag-european-parliament","tag-pfizer","tag-technocracy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47961","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=47961"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47961\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47962,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47961\/revisions\/47962"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=47961"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=47961"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=47961"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}