Falsifying evidence is a criminal offense. We are about to find out whether the laws actually do apply to the people in Congress.<\/p>\n
On Wednesday, The Western Journal<\/a> reported the following:<\/p>\n It\u2019s amazing to me that California Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff is not in jail. This lawmaker has played it fast and loose, first during the Trump\/Russia collusion investigation, which put him on the map, and next in the House impeachment inquiry of former President Donald Trump. There is no line this unethical, truth-challenged, repellent snake won\u2019t cross in the name of politics.<\/strong><\/p>\n The Federalist\u2019s Sean Davis reported on Wednesday that Schiff was up to his old tricks at Monday night\u2019s hearing of the Jan. 6 Committee<\/a>. According to Davis, Schiff \u201cclaimed to have proof\u201d that Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, a Republican, texted then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows \u201cto instruct former Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Davis claims that Schiff misrepresented \u201cthe substance of the text message and its source.\u201d Schiff \u201ceven doctored original text messages, which were obtained and reviewed by The Federalist in their entirety.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n The article explains the changes Representative Schiff made to the text messages:<\/p>\n Davis (The Federalist\u2019s Sean Davis) explains that in addition to lying about \u201csubstance\u201d and the \u201csource\u201d of the text, Schiff \u201ceven doctored the message and graphic that he displayed on screen during his statement. The full text message, which was forwarded to Meadows from Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, on the evening of Monday, Jan. 5, was significantly longer than what Schiff read and put on screen, but Schiff erased significant portions of the text and added punctuation where there was none to give the impression that Jordan himself was tersely directing Meadows to give orders to Pence on how to handle the electoral vote certification.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Davis continues: \u201cThe original text was written by Washington attorney and former Department of Defense Inspector General Joseph Schmitz and included an attachment of a four-page draft Word document drafted by Schmitz that detailed Schmitz\u2019s legal reasoning for suggesting that Pence had the constitutional authority to object to the certification of electoral votes submitted by a handful of states. The piece that Schmitz had sent to Jordan was published at the website everylegal.vote the next day and even included the same \u2018DISCUSSION DRAFT\u2019 heading and timestamp on the document that Schmitz sent to Jordan.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n He explains that Schmitz sent this text to Jordan \u201con the evening of Jan. 5, including the Word document as an attachment. Schmitz then texted to Jordan a three-paragraph summary of his Word document, which Schiff sliced and diced and then attributed to Jordan.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Would anyone like to wager on how much of the above chicanery will be reported by the mainstream media?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Falsifying evidence is a criminal offense. We are about to find out whether the laws actually do apply to the people in Congress. On Wednesday, The Western Journal reported the following: It\u2019s amazing to me that California Democratic Rep. Adam … Continue reading