One of the problems with the political left’s claim that January 6th was an insurrection is that none of the ‘insurrectionists’ had weapons. The only person shot was an unarmed civilian by a policeman, and there are a lot of questions surrounding the incident. I somehow think real insurrectionists might have been armed. I also wonder why they are called insurrectionists when there is public video showing the police waving them into the building. But a narrative is a narrative I guess. At any rate, the political left is not done with January 6th. Their next step is somewhat unbelievable.<\/p>\n
Yesterday BizPacReview<\/a> posted the following:<\/p>\n The FBI has previously stated that no firearms were found in connection to the Jan. 6 storming of the Capitol, but despite that contention, the media is now breathlessly reporting that authorities have found guns in the homes of protesters.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cNumerous people arrested in connection with January 6 have also had weapons in their homes, including this latest case just today \u2014 3 pistols and an AR-15,\u201d Mother Jones explosively tweeted<\/a> in reference to an NBC report.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cSome January 6 defendants, including additional Oath Keeper members charged with conspiracy, have lied to investigators and went to significant lengths to destroy evidence of their communications related to the insurrection, according to court documents. Others have kept weapons in their homes in violation of pretrial orders. And some defendants have threatened future attacks,\u201d they reported<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n The defendants have not been found guilty of anything yet. They still have Second Amendment rights. I seriously doubt the part about future attacks since there was never an attack to begin with.<\/p>\n The article continues:<\/p>\n NBC New York is reporting<\/a> that a man named Antonio Vuksanaj was arrested Thursday in connection with the Jan. 6 protest on federal trespassing-related charges. An AR-15 as well as three other guns were allegedly found in his home. The media outlet notes that it is unclear if these were his and if they were possessed legally. It should have been fairly simple for a major media outlet to find out if that was or wasn\u2019t the case but it apparently doesn\u2019t make for as good a headline.<\/strong><\/p>\n Vuksanaj was turned in by a tipster and has pleaded not guilty. He\u2019s facing trespassing and disorderly conduct-related charges which don\u2019t appear to have any connection to possessing firearms. Nevertheless, outlets such as Mother Jones are seizing on the fact that he had guns at home which may or may not have been perfectly legal.<\/strong><\/p>\n The article also notes:<\/p>\n Sanborn (Jill Sanborn, an FBI official) contended at the time that nobody from the riot was facing weapons charges, though a firearm was recovered from a van containing Molotov cocktails found near the Capitol. It is not publicly known whose van that was and if those involved were actual protesters taking part in the riot.<\/strong><\/p>\n Please follow the link above to the article. The tweets in response to the Mother Jones article are hilarious. Mother Jones needs to go back to her days of Acapulco Gold and give up on the magazine.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" One of the problems with the political left’s claim that January 6th was an insurrection is that none of the ‘insurrectionists’ had weapons. The only person shot was an unarmed civilian by a policeman, and there are a lot of … Continue reading