The Constitution does not grant us our rights–it specifically states that our rights come from God. The Constitution is there to protect those rights. Unfortunately, many of our leaders have forgotten that. Those on the political left have begun to use our federal agencies as an arm of the Democrat party. They have also learned to use the media to blunt the blow when information about their questionable activities is about to come out.<\/p>\n
Yesterday American Greatness<\/a> posted an article that noted the role played by The New York Times in downplaying the pending indictment against Michael Sussman. Sussman, as you probably remember, was instrumental in getting the idea that Donald Trump was colluding with the Russians out into the public square. Well, The New York Times is at it again.<\/p>\n The article reports:<\/p>\n On Saturday, the Times<\/i> published a carefully constructed bombshell intended to soften the blow of an explosive scandal in the making: the FBI had at least one informant among the group of Proud Boys who marched on the Capitol on January 6. The informant, according to \u201cconfidential documents\u201d furnished to the paper, started working with the FBI in July 2020 and was in close contact with his FBI handler before, during, and after the Capitol protest.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cAfter meeting his fellow Proud Boys at the Washington Monument that morning, the informant described his path to the Capitol grounds where he saw barriers knocked down and Trump supporters streaming into the building, the records show,\u201d reporters Alan Feuer and Adam Goldman (the Times<\/i> reporter most responsible for priming the ground for news that was unfavorable to the Russia collusion narrative) wrote<\/a> on September 25. \u201cIn a detailed account of his activities contained in the records, the informant, who was part of a group chat of other Proud Boys, described meeting up with scores of men from chapters around the country at 10 a.m. on Jan. 6 at the Washington Monument and eventually marching to the Capitol. He said that when he arrived, throngs of people were already streaming past the first barrier outside the building, which, he later learned, was taken down by one of his Proud Boy acquaintances and a young woman with him.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n In other words, one of the informant\u2019s Proud Boy \u201cacquaintances\u201d was removing temporary barriers to allow a crowd to enter the restricted grounds around the building.<\/strong><\/p>\n Sounds legit.<\/strong><\/p>\n The article also notes that there was another informant who took part in the sacking of the Capitol.<\/p>\n The article concludes with the following story:<\/p>\n In fact, after Beattie\u2019s articles posted in June, Alan Feuer, the same reporter who co-authored this weekend\u2019s spin story, wrote a piece<\/a> disclosing Rhodes had been interviewed by the FBI in May. (Feuer\u2019s article, conveniently, was posted after<\/i> FBI Director Wray testified twice on Capitol Hill this week.)<\/strong><\/p>\n Further, in my interview with him this week, Thomas Caldwell<\/a>, one of the first people arrested in the Oath Keepers case, told me Rhodes approached him during a Stop the Steal rally in Virginia last November. Rhodes told Caldwell the Oath Keepers provided security for conservatives and asked if he\u2019d be interested in assisting in the future.<\/strong><\/p>\n Caldwell gave Rhodes his contact information, which led to Rhodes connecting Caldwell with other Oath Keepers; plans were made to travel to D.C. and meet near the Capitol after Trump\u2019s speech on January 6.<\/strong><\/p>\n Caldwell\u2019s home was raided and he was arrested on January 19, just two weeks after the protest. Prosecutors already had a trove of evidence against Caldwell, which is highly curious considering Caldwell never entered the building and was charged with no violent crime.<\/strong><\/p>\n How did the government get Caldwell\u2019s information so quickly? It certainly suggests the involvement of someone working on the inside, someone who immediately provided investigators with incriminating evidence.<\/strong><\/p>\n Someone like an FBI informant.<\/strong><\/p>\n One thing is certain; the Times<\/i> damage-control article is just the tip of the FBI iceberg. And more proof January 6 was an inside job.<\/strong><\/p>\n How are the actions of the FBI considered Constitutional?<\/p>\n \n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The Constitution does not grant us our rights–it specifically states that our rights come from God. The Constitution is there to protect those rights. Unfortunately, many of our leaders have forgotten that. Those on the political left have begun to … Continue reading