{"id":41947,"date":"2021-04-26T12:25:30","date_gmt":"2021-04-26T16:25:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=41947"},"modified":"2021-04-26T12:25:30","modified_gmt":"2021-04-26T16:25:30","slug":"the-impact-of-president-bidens-tax-policies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=41947","title":{"rendered":"The Impact of President Biden&#8217;s Tax Policies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In April 2014, <a href=\"https:\/\/taxfoundation.org\/how-many-words-are-tax-code\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Tax Foundation<\/a> reported the following:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>The tax code is huge and complex. But how huge and complex is it?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Andrew Grossman, the legislation counsel for the Joint Committee on Taxation that helps write tax laws, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/articles\/news_and_politics\/politics\/2014\/04\/how_long_is_the_tax_code_it_is_far_shorter_than_70_000_pages.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">attacked us in <em>Slate <\/em>yesterday<\/a> for saying that the tax code runs 70,000 pages, countering that it\u2019s \u201conly\u201d 2,600 pages.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>So how long is the U.S. tax code really? There are a couple ways to look at it.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Statutes<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>There\u2019s the literal statutes that Congress has passed (Title 26 of the U.S. Code). The Government Printing Office sells it spread over two volumes, and <a href=\"http:\/\/bookstore.gpo.gov\/products\/sku\/052-001-00635-6?ctid=130\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">according to them<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/bookstore.gpo.gov\/products\/sku\/052-001-00635-6?ctid=130\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">book one<\/a> is 1,404 pages and <a href=\"http:\/\/bookstore.gpo.gov\/products\/sku\/052-001-00636-4?ctid=130\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">book two<\/a> is 1,248 pages, for a total of <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">2,652 pages<\/span>. At perhaps 450 words per page, that puts the tax code at well over <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">1 million words<\/span>. (By way of comparison, the King James Bible has 788,280 words; <em>War and Peace <\/em>runs 560,000 words; and the <em>Harry Potter <\/em>series is just over 1 million words.)<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Statutes and Regulations<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>However, a tax practitioner who relies just on the tax statutes will go to jail, because so much of federal tax law is in IRS regulations, revenue rulings, and other clarifications. Congress will set down a policy and leave it to the IRS to write all the rules to implement it. These regulations aren\u2019t short: the National Taxpayer Advocate did a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov\/userfiles\/file\/Full-Report\/Most-Serious-Problems-Tax-Code-Complexity.pdf#page=4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Microsoft Word word count<\/a> of the tax statutes and IRS regulations in 2012, and came up with roughly <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">4 million words<\/span>. Again at roughly 450 words per page, that comes out to around <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">9,000 pages<\/span>. The National Taxpayer Advocate also noted that the tax code changed 4,680 times from 2001 to 2012, an average of once per day.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The tax code is that large and that complex due to the efforts of lobbyists in Washington, D.C. Money talks. Corporations and foreign governments know how to get around laws limiting their gifts (bribes) to Congressmen, and Congressmen know how to earn money through investments in areas of the economy (and other countries) influenced by their decisions. It&#8217;s not right, but it is what is.<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsmax.com\/politics\/kudlow-economy-tax-hike-biden\/2021\/04\/25\/id\/1018940\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Newsmax<\/a> posted an article about some recent comments made by former Trump Chief Economist Larry Kudlow about President Biden&#8217;s tax proposals.<\/p>\n<p>The article reports:<\/p>\n<p>Former Trump Chief Economist Larry Kudlow says President Joe Biden&#8217;s tax plan is an \u201cassault on investment.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>\u201cThere&#8217;s some pretty tough headwinds ahead if these taxes, which are an assault on investment\u00a0&#8230; and\u00a0the people they are going to hurt the most are the middle class, the blue collar middle class, [who will bear] 70% of the burden of the corporate tax, which includes the capital gains tax, 70% of that burden falls on the blue-collar middle class. Make no mistake about that Biden rhetoric notwithstanding,\u201d Kudlow on Sunday told John Catsimatidis\u00a0on his radio show,\u00a0&#8220;The Cats Roundtable &#8221; on WABC 770 <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/AM_broadcasting\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">AM<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>When corporate profits are down that means less investment, less capital, which results in less family income, he explained.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>\u201cYou&#8217;re going to take about 20 to 25 percent\u00a0of corporate profits down. Now, that means less investment, that means less money to payout wages, that means less money to purchase new machinery and equipment to enhance productivity, and that means family incomes are gonna go down.\u00a0That&#8217;s the cap gains tax, which runs through corporate profits taxes,\u201d said Kudlow.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Because of Biden\u2019s tax plan, over time, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) will drop 1 percentage point, \u201cthis is not good,\u201d he added.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The article concludes:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Under former President Donald Trump\u2019s economic principals \u201cwe&#8217;re in a boom,\u201d he said.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>\u201cThis economy is in good shape because right now before new legislation. Tax rates are low, and the regulatory burdens are low, and we still have energy independence,\u201d he said.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Kudlow asked, \u201cWhy would you start taxing the daylights out of an economy that is roaring ahead? I don\u2019t get it.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>\u201cDon&#8217;t use your ideology from the left to smother this boom for heaven sakes&#8211;use common sense,&#8221; he said. He continued; this is ideology. This is a progressive left wing ideology tax. The rich redistribute incomes to build up a new great society, a social welfare state, he said.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Hang on to your wallet. Tax and spend is here for at least three more years unless conservatives take over Congress in 2022.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In April 2014, The Tax Foundation reported the following: The tax code is huge and complex. But how huge and complex is it? Andrew Grossman, the legislation counsel for the Joint Committee on Taxation that helps write tax laws, attacked &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=41947\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[11226,7830,13702,10241,13701],"class_list":["post-41947","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-larry-kudlow","tag-newsmax","tag-president-bidens-tax-policies","tag-tax-code","tag-the-tax-foundation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41947","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=41947"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41947\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41948,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41947\/revisions\/41948"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=41947"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=41947"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=41947"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}