{"id":40773,"date":"2020-12-19T10:38:35","date_gmt":"2020-12-19T15:38:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=40773"},"modified":"2020-12-19T10:38:35","modified_gmt":"2020-12-19T15:38:35","slug":"not-sure-this-will-hold","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=40773","title":{"rendered":"Not Sure This Will Hold"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yesterday The Epoch Times<\/a> posted an article about the Supreme Court decision regarding counting non-citizens in the 2020 census. The decision is somewhat confusing, but here are the highlights.<\/p>\n

The article reports:<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court<\/a> ruled that the federal government may remove\u00a0illegal aliens\u00a0from the 2020 Census count, which eliminates that population from the process of allocating congressional seats and Electoral College votes that officially determine the presidency.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The 6-3 decision in Trump v. New York<\/a> issued Dec. 18 is a victory for the Trump administration.<\/strong><\/p>\n

So far, that is good news.<\/p>\n

The article continues:<\/p>\n

States and local governments, including so-called sanctuary jurisdictions, which refuse to cooperate with federal immigration officials, sued to prevent the administration\u2019s plan from moving forward. They argued that President Donald Trump, a Republican, was attempting to interfere with the count and prevent Democratic-leaning areas with large illegal-alien populations from gaining congressional seats.<\/strong><\/p>\n

But the high court found that their challenge was premature because they could not demonstrate any so-called concrete injury they might suffer. The ruling apparently leaves open the possibility of further challenges in the future and acknowledges the Trump administration may have difficulty implementing its policy.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cAt present, this case is riddled with contingencies and speculation that impede judicial review,\u201d the court stated in the unsigned opinion.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe President, to be sure, has made clear his desire to exclude aliens without lawful status from the apportionment base. But the President qualified his directive by providing that\u201d information should be gathered \u201cto the extent practicable\u201d and that aliens should be excluded \u201cto the extent feasible,\u201d quoting federal regulations.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cAny prediction how the Executive Branch might eventually implement this general statement of policy is \u201cno more than conjecture\u201d at this time,\u201d the court stated citing Los Angeles v. Lyons (1983).<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cTo begin with, the policy may not prove feasible to implement in any manner whatsoever, let alone in a manner substantially likely to harm any of the plaintiffs here. Pre-apportionment litigation always \u2018presents a moving target\u2019 because\u201d the administration \u201cmay make (and the President may direct) changes to the census up until the President transmits his statement to the House.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Supreme Court opinion allows the Trump administration to try to implement its counting policy for now even though processing of 2020 Census data is expected to wrap up in coming weeks. Existing law requires the president to file a mandatory reapportionment report with Congress next month, which could lead to reduced federal funding in states with large illegal-alien populations.<\/strong><\/p>\n

As expected, the ACLU is already planning to sue.<\/p>\n

Please follow the link above to read the entire article. This case is a convoluted mess. What is at stake is whether states like California, with large numbers of illegal aliens, will receive representation in Congress and the Electoral College because of their illegal residents.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yesterday The Epoch Times posted an article about the Supreme Court decision regarding counting non-citizens in the 2020 census. The decision is somewhat confusing, but here are the highlights. The article reports: The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[11889,735,8365,181,274,12407],"class_list":["post-40773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-2020-census","tag-congress","tag-electoral-college","tag-illegal-aliens","tag-supreme-court","tag-the-epoch-times"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=40773"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40773\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40774,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40773\/revisions\/40774"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=40773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=40773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=40773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}