{"id":40301,"date":"2020-10-27T15:34:39","date_gmt":"2020-10-27T19:34:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=40301"},"modified":"2020-10-27T15:34:39","modified_gmt":"2020-10-27T19:34:39","slug":"know-your-sources","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=40301","title":{"rendered":"Know Your Sources"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yesterday The Washington Free Beacon<\/a> posted an article about the British magazine the Economis<\/em>t.<\/p>\n

The article reports:<\/p>\n

The Economist<\/em> provided sympathetic coverage of a Chinese tech giant widely considered a national security risk without disclosing the publication’s lucrative business relationship with the firm that spanned nearly a decade.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Huawei Technologies commissioned the Economist<\/em>\u2018s business consulting division to advance its policy agendas and deflect cybersecurity concerns raised by Western governments. The influential British magazine produced reports on a wide range of subjects\u2014including a report on broadband access in the United Kingdom that Huawei credits to have influenced British policy. The publication has also run numerous Huawei advertisements, and its editors have cohosted several global forums with the company, helping the tech firm boost its public image as it faced growing scrutiny from the developed world for its close ties with the Chinese government.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Economist<\/em> defended Huawei in a front-page cover story<\/a> in 2012\u2014the year the publication’s consulting division started working with the company\u2014that accused Western countries of using cybersecurity concerns as a pretense to oppose legitimate competition from Huawei. The publication’s coverage of the tech company has become less overtly pro-Huawei in recent years, but the Economist<\/em>\u2018s coverage of the company is seen as friendly enough that Huawei’s PR division has cited several\u00a0<\/i>of the magazine’s\u00a0articles to deflect criticism.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The article concludes:<\/p>\n

While the Economist<\/em>\u2018s\u00a0coverage of Huawei has become more skeptical of the Chinese firm over the years, the magazine continues to criticize<\/a> U.S. efforts to sanction Huawei. The company has been all too happy to cite some of the Economist<\/em>\u2018s coverage in its “facts” section, which seeks<\/a> to assuage concerns about Huawei. Its CEO, Ren Zhengfei, also gave open-ended interviews with the publication in December 2019 and January 2020, the latter with the Economist<\/em>\u2018s editor in chief.<\/strong><\/p>\n

None of the Economist<\/em>\u2018s coverage of Huawei mentioned the publication’s long-standing business relationship with the tech firm.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nile Gardiner, a foreign policy expert at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said that Huawei’s relationship with the Economist<\/em> appears to be part of its multifaceted campaign to influence British and European public opinion.<\/strong><\/p>\n

“Huawei has a large propaganda operation in Europe and invests vast sums of money to influence thinking in Europe,” he said. “It is very disappointing that some European media organizations and businesses chose to collaborate with an entity that is controlled by the Chinese Communist Party.”<\/strong><\/p>\n

This relationship is important to note because it illustrates one way the Chinese Communist Party peddles influence. All of the shenanigans we see going on between the Biden family and the CCP generally relate to gaining access and peddling influence. The CCP uses its money and businesses to infiltrate western media and politics to gain advantages in trade and policy decisions. The thing to remember is that no business is successful in China unless it follows the wishes of the Communist Party.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yesterday The Washington Free Beacon posted an article about the British magazine the Economist. The article reports: The Economist provided sympathetic coverage of a Chinese tech giant widely considered a national security risk without disclosing the publication’s lucrative business relationship … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[13049,13047,13048,8827,9385],"class_list":["post-40301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-chinese-communist-party-ccp","tag-economist","tag-huawei","tag-the-heritage-foundation","tag-the-washington-free-beacon"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40301","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=40301"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40301\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40302,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40301\/revisions\/40302"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=40301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=40301"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=40301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}