Based on the information that has already come out, many Americans (at least those who don’t depend on the mainstream media for their news) believe that there was a soft coup attempt on President Trump that began immediately after he was elected. As information is made public from various investigations, this is becoming more obvious.<\/p>\n
The Daily Caller<\/a> posted an article yesterday about some of the latest information to come out.<\/p>\n The article reports:<\/p>\n The article continues:<\/p>\n An FBI document released Friday details at least 14 inaccuracies in a New York Times report from early 2017 that leveled shocking allegations of Trump associates\u2019 contacts with Russian intelligence officers.<\/strong><\/p>\n The document shows then-FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok\u2019s comments on a Feb. 14, 2017 article<\/a> entitled \u201cTrump Campaign Aides Had Repeated Contacts With Russian Intelligence.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n Written by journalists Michael Schmidt, Mark Mazzetti and Matt Apuzzo, the story cited four current and former American officials who said that U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies had intercepted call records showing that Trump associates had contacts with Russian intelligence in the year prior to the election.<\/strong><\/p>\n Strzok, who was the lead investigator on the Trump investigation, spotted 14 errors in the article.<\/strong><\/p>\n The article concludes:<\/p>\n Sen. Lindsey Graham, who released the FBI documents on Friday, said<\/a> in a press release that Strzok\u2019s annotations on the Times article \u201care devastating in that they are an admission that there was no reliable evidence that anyone from the Trump Campaign was working with Russian Intelligence Agencies in any form.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n James Comey<\/a>, the former FBI director, criticized the Times report shortly after he was fired in May 2017. He told the Senate Intelligence Committee on June 7, 2017, that the story was \u201calmost entirely\u201d inaccurate.<\/strong><\/p>\n The Times stood by the story despite the pushback from Comey.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cThe original sources could not immediately be reached after Mr. Comey\u2019s remarks, but in the months since the article was published, they have indicated that they believed the account was solid,\u201d the paper said in a statement following Comey\u2019s testimony.<\/strong><\/p>\n The New York Times was driving the narrative that President Trump was a Russian agent. Their reporting was inaccurate from the beginning. Unfortunately, there are many Americans who still believe the fiction The New York Times was publishing. That is one of many causes for the divisiveness that we are currently seeing in America.<\/p>\n As Daniel Patrick Moynihan once stated, “You<\/b> are<\/b> entitled<\/b> to<\/b> your<\/b> opinion<\/b>. But you<\/b> are<\/b> not entitled<\/b> to<\/b> your<\/b> own facts.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Based on the information that has already come out, many Americans (at least those who don’t depend on the mainstream media for their news) believe that there was a soft coup attempt on President Trump that began immediately after he … Continue reading \n