{"id":38067,"date":"2020-01-28T15:53:32","date_gmt":"2020-01-28T20:53:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=38067"},"modified":"2020-01-28T15:53:32","modified_gmt":"2020-01-28T20:53:32","slug":"a-very-easy-follow-the-money","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=38067","title":{"rendered":"A Very Easy &#8216;Follow The Money&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/policy\/economy\/house-democrats-to-vote-to-override-state-right-to-work-laws-boosting-labor-movement?fbclid=IwAR2zsUVwgoxkHuQPmSJ9ltkTHnfwEj5D4bBgD59RuIuPDYURxl2OXvMm7RQ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">The Washington Examiner<\/a> is reporting today that the House is planning to vote next week on a law that would override right-to-work laws in the 27 states that have those laws.<\/p>\n<p>The article reports:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>House Education and Labor Committee Chairman Bobby Scott, a Virginia Democrat, argued that such &#8220;right-to-work&#8221; laws are unfair to unions and the workers that back collective bargaining, necessitating <a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/116th-congress\/house-bill\/2474\/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22organizing%22%5D%7D&amp;r=1&amp;s=2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">his bill<\/a>, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>\u201cUnder current law, unions are required to negotiate on behalf of all employees, regardless if they belong to the union or not,&#8221; Scott told the <i>Washington Examiner. &#8220;<\/i>The PRO Act simply allows workers to decide that all workers represented by the union should contribute to the costs associated with negotiating on their behalf.&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Scrapping the state laws would force potentially millions of individual workers to give away part of their salaries, whether they wanted to or not, said Greg Mourad, vice president of the National Right to Work Committee, which represents workers in cases against unions. \u201cThe term \u2018right to work&#8217; means the right to not have to pay for union so-called representation that workers don\u2019t want, didn\u2019t ask for, and believe actually goes against their interests,&#8221; he told the <i>Washington Examiner<\/i>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The article notes:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Right-to-work laws say that employees cannot be forced to join or otherwise financially support a union as a condition of their job. Specifically, the laws prohibit union-management contracts from including so-called fair share fee provisions that require all workers to support the union financially.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>When you consider that unions donate large amounts of money to Democrat campaign coffers, this bill is not a surprise. However, it seems to me that it is a violation of the Tenth Amendment&#8211;the federal government does not have the authority to determine right-to-work laws in individual states.<\/p>\n<p>The article concludes:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>The resurgence in right-to-work laws may now be ebbing. No other state appears poised to adopt one. Missouri would have been the 28th state, but voters last year approved a referendum stopping the measure before it went into effect.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>The PRO Act would rewrite the NLRA to undo the 1947 amendment. \u201cThis bill, and others we\u2019ve seen in various states, tries to subtly redefine \u2018right to work\u2019 to mean only the right to not have to formally be a member of the union, which is already guaranteed by the Supreme Court,\u201d Mourad said. Nonmembers would still be obligated to support unions financially.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>There has long been support for scrapping right to work on the Left, but the PRO Act enjoys unprecedented support among Democrats. The Senate version of the PRO Act was introduced with 39 original co-sponsors, comprising almost the entire Democratic caucus. The legislation is certain to pass the Democrat-majority House but is unlikely to be taken up in the Republican-led Senate.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>\u201cThey\u2019re testing the waters for the next time they are in the majority,\u201d Vernuccio said.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In this instance, the Democrats are standing for the unions&#8211;not for the working man. This is simply a scheme to take more money our of workers&#8217; pockets, give it to unions, and have unions give it to Democrat candidates. Democrat majorities in Congress are not helpful to the average American.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Washington Examiner is reporting today that the House is planning to vote next week on a law that would override right-to-work laws in the 27 states that have those laws. The article reports: House Education and Labor Committee Chairman &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=38067\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3957,669,9717,10015,4523,711,274,5511,2720,4656,430],"class_list":["post-38067","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-collective-bargaining","tag-democrat","tag-democratic-caucus","tag-federal-government","tag-right-to-work-law","tag-senate","tag-supreme-court","tag-tenth-amendment","tag-the-washington-examiner","tag-unions","tag-washington-examiner"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38067","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=38067"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38067\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38068,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38067\/revisions\/38068"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=38067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=38067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=38067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}