Inspector General Michael Horowitz stated in his report that he believed that there was no political bias involved in the surveillance of Carter Page and the Trump campaign. I guess he never read the emails that went between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page–particularly the one about an ‘insurance policy’ if Donald Trump became President. Wow. But there is another interesting character related to the Inspector General’s Report.<\/p>\n
American Thinker<\/a> posted an article today about Bruce Swartz. Who is Bruce Swartz?<\/p>\n The article reports:<\/p>\n The Inspector General\u2019s Report<\/a> from the Department of Justice (DOJ) features a heretofore unheralded costar by the name of Bruce Swartz, the assistant attorney general in the Criminal Division. Swartz was also the supervisor of the feckless Bruce Ohr, husband of Fusion GPS contractor Nellie Ohr and frequent breakfast buddy of Christopher Steele of Steele dossier fame.<\/strong><\/p>\n Unreported by Inspector General Michael Horowitz, however, was Swartz\u2019s starring role in another DoJ drama some 15 years earlier. Given the scant media attention the case received in 2004-2005, it is possible Horowitz did not even know about Swartz\u2019s yeoman effort to save Clinton National Security Advisor Sandy Berger from a lengthy sojourn in a federal Supermax.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cWe did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions to open the four individual investigations,\u201d reported Horowitz. Had the IG been able to compare Swartz\u2019s protection of Berger to his pursuit of one-time Trump adviser Paul Manafort, the evidence would have kicked him in the teeth.<\/strong><\/p>\n As Swartz himself acknowledged, he had a Javert-like zeal to bring Manafort to justice. \u201cOhr and Swartz both told us that they felt an urgency to move the Manafort investigation forward,\u201d reported Horowitz,\u00a0 \u201cbecause of Trump’s election and a concern that the new administration would shut the investigation down.\u201d This urgency translated into frequent semi-covert meetings with the FBI lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. Strzok told the IG that Swartz wanted him to “kick that [investigation] in the ass and get it moving.”<\/strong><\/p>\n Swartz continued to \u201cweigh in\u201d on the Manafort investigation even though it was clearly outside his jurisdiction. In December 2016, concerned that the DoJ\u2019s money laundering division (MLARS) was not moving fast enough against Manafort, Swartz brought colleague Andrew Weissman into the act.<\/strong><\/p>\n The article continues:<\/p>\n Swartz is the textbook swamp dweller. From all appearances, no matter who sits in the attorney general\u2019s chair, these seemingly respectable subversives protect the progressive deep state and punish those who would threaten it. Supplied leads by a complicit media and shielded by that same media from exposure, people like Swartz have been perverting justice for decades.<\/strong><\/p>\n If proof were needed, Swartz and his boys recommended a $10,000 fine for Berger and three-year loss of security clearance for a crime that would have put a Republican in prison for decades. Happily for the Deep State, Berger regained his clearance just in time to serve as a Hillary Clinton adviser in the 2008 campaign.<\/strong><\/p>\n Manafort did not fare quite so well. He was indicted by a federal grand jury in a city that gave Donald Trump 4 percent of its vote. Then, to prevent President Trump from dangling a federal pardon, the New York friends of the Deep State prosecuted Manafort on state charges.<\/strong><\/p>\n True, the Russia collusion fears that inspired the Manafort investigation were imaginary, but the federal and state charges are very real. Manafort has descended into a Kafkaesque legal hell from which the 70-year-old will likely not emerge alive.<\/strong><\/p>\n Until the swamp is fully drained, we will not have equal justice under the law.<\/p>\n Inspector General Michael Horowitz stated in his report that he believed that there was no political bias involved in the surveillance of Carter Page and the Trump campaign. I guess he never read the emails that went between Peter Strzok … Continue reading