{"id":37241,"date":"2019-10-08T13:52:30","date_gmt":"2019-10-08T17:52:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=37241"},"modified":"2019-10-08T13:52:30","modified_gmt":"2019-10-08T17:52:30","slug":"when-you-poke-the-bear","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=37241","title":{"rendered":"When You Poke The Bear"},"content":{"rendered":"

There were two articles posted at The Federalist yesterday (here<\/a> and here<\/a>) about the current circus in the House of Representatives. I suspect this is not going exactly the way the Democrats had intended.<\/p>\n

The first article notes:<\/p>\n

In tense testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) on Friday, the inspector general for federal spy agencies refused to disclose why his office backdated secret changes to key whistleblower forms and rules in the wake of an anti-Trump whistleblower complaint filed in August, sources told The Federalist.<\/strong><\/p>\n

As The Federalist reported<\/a> and the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) confirmed<\/a>, the spy watchdog secretly changed its whistleblower forms and internal rules<\/a> in September to eliminate a requirement that whistleblowers provide first-hand evidence to support any allegations of wrongdoing. In a press release last week, the ICIG confessed that it changed its rules in response to an anti-Trump complaint filed on August 12. That complaint, which was declassified and released by President Donald Trump in September, was based entirely on second-hand information, much of which was shown to be false<\/a> following the declassification and release of a telephone conversation between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The first article concludes:<\/p>\n

Several top lawmakers in the Senate raised similar concerns about Atkinson\u2019s behavior in a separate letter.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cWhy did the IC IG initially require first-hand information in its May 2018 disclosure form?\u201d the senators asked<\/a>. \u201cWhy did the IC IG remove the requirement for first-hand information?\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Atkinson has not answered their questions, either, raising questions that his behavior following his receipt of the anti-Trump complaint might not be completely above board. Atkinson ignored legal guidance from both the director of national intelligence and the Department of Justice that the anti-Trump complaint was statutorily deficient and forwarded it to HPSCI even though it did not meet the legal definition of an \u201curgent concern\u201d that is required to be given to Congress.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The embattled ICIG also admitted on Friday that the anti-Trump complainant lied on his whistleblower complaint form by concealing the complainant\u2019s previous secret interactions with House Democratic staff prior to submitting the complaint. Atkinson never even bothered investigating potential coordination between the complainant, whom DOJ said showed evidence of partisan political bias, and House Democrats prior to the filing of the anti-Trump complaint.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The second article is more of a history of the entire Ukraine scandal. It mentions the fact that there are genuine concerns about Ukraine interference in the 2016 American presidential election.<\/p>\n

The second article also suggests some motivation behind this current circus:<\/p>\n

The Democrats\u2019 case for impeachment is hopeless, but their motivation is simple. They whipped up their base into such a delusional frenzy during the \u201cRussia investigation,\u201d they have to keep the narrative going at all costs. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi faces a rebellion from her caucus if she doesn\u2019t go along with it.
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

There may be a more serious motivation behind this:<\/p>\n

But there\u2019s a group of intelligence bureaucrats at work here, and their motivation is a bit different.\u00a0An immediate motive may be to prevent an investigation into how the Russia probe started. This includes an investigation into how a document the Hillary Clinton campaign created \u2014 using anonymous Russians and a British national tied to Russia \u2014 was used by our intelligence agencies to investigate Trump.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The other possible motivation is more complex. During the \u201cRussia investigation,\u201d many in the intelligence agencies worked to subvert Trump\u2019s foreign policy and remove Trump, through spying, a large series of leaks, and articles planted with friendly outlets. Trump\u2019s campaign was even spied on before the election, via something called the \u201ctwo-hop rule,\u201d once a secret court granted a warrant to spy on Trump campaign officials such as Carter Page.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Because of this, the White House moved to cut off the broader \u201cintelligence community\u201d \u2014 inexorably tied to America\u2019s foreign policy establishment that Trump ran against \u2014 from information the White House knew many in the intelligence agencies would use to selectively leak.<\/strong><\/p>\n

That could mean some of what\u2019s going on today, at least from the CIA angle, is intelligence bureaucrats \u201cstriking back\u201d because they lost their access<\/a> to diplomatic communications, a coveted source of the intelligence community\u2019s power. But even the Obama administration<\/a> liked to hide diplomatic calls from the broader intelligence community, which should tell us something about that bureaucracy.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The second article includes the following statement:<\/p>\n

In other words, the real big takeaway here is that we have a problem with our Washington bureaucracy, including our intelligence agencies, which have routinely crossed the line into policymaking<\/a>. How much of the impeachment mess is due to CIA bureaucrats being incensed that Trump, who is elected, would dare to question military aid to Ukraine, and would dare to curtail their eavesdropping on diplomacy?<\/strong><\/p>\n

What we see here is an illustration of the reason why we need to drain the swamp.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There were two articles posted at The Federalist yesterday (here and here) about the current circus in the House of Representatives. I suspect this is not going exactly the way the Democrats had intended. The first article notes: In tense … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[12243,853,69,4172,2578,10375,451,1619,12335,12342,11379,5339,11815,9533,11114,11882],"class_list":["post-37241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-declassification","tag-democrats","tag-department-of-justice","tag-director-of-national-intelligence","tag-foreign-policy","tag-hillary-clinton-campaign","tag-house-of-representatives","tag-inspector-general","tag-intelligence-community-inspector-general-icig","tag-michael-atkinson","tag-russia-investigation","tag-testimony","tag-the-federalist","tag-the-hill","tag-trump-campaign","tag-whistleblower"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=37241"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37241\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37242,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37241\/revisions\/37242"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=37241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=37241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=37241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}