{"id":36528,"date":"2019-07-09T14:16:01","date_gmt":"2019-07-09T18:16:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=36528"},"modified":"2019-07-09T14:16:01","modified_gmt":"2019-07-09T18:16:01","slug":"judicial-watch-uncovers-more-lying-under-oath","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=36528","title":{"rendered":"Judicial Watch Uncovers More Lying Under Oath"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yesterday The Gateway Pundit<\/a> posted an article about the interview notes of the FBI’s interview with Hillary Clinton’s attorney Heather Samuelson. Those notes have been uncovered due to the efforts of Judicial Watch. There are some problems with the facts as stated by Ms. Samuelson.<\/p>\n

The article reports:<\/p>\n

In the interview Samuelson states to the FBI\u2019s Peter Strzok that she was assigned the duty of reviewing Hillary\u2019s emails and in doing so, Samuelson reviewed the emails on her laptop both at her apartment and in Cheryl Mills\u2019 office.<\/strong><\/p>\n

…Samuelson was assigned the task of obtaining Hillary\u2019s emails for her tenure as Obama\u2019s Secretary of State. After making a request for Hillary\u2019s emails from Platte River Networks (PRN), the firm that administered Hillary\u2019s personal email system, Samuelson reviewed them and noticed that some of Hillary\u2019s emails were missing.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Samuelson stated that she believed that Hillary\u2019s emails that were missing for the period between January 2009 through March 2009 must have not been backed up.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The article then notes that the government email system is such that there is no way that emails from a Secretary of State would not have been backed up.<\/p>\n

The story continues:<\/p>\n

Next Samuelson makes another shocking remark.\u00a0 She states that after Clinton left the State Department she started using another domain for her emails (@hrcoffice.com<\/a>).\u00a0 But she states that no old emails were transferred from the clintonemail.com<\/a> domain to the new domain.\u00a0 She also stated that she didn\u2019t know how Clinton or her close assistant Huma Abedin obtained her old emails once the new domain was established.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The article states the problem with Ms. Samuelson’s statement:<\/p>\n

And here is where Samuelson lays an egg!\u00a0 Samuelson noticed during her review that Hillary\u2019s emails were displayed as hrod17@clintonemail.com,\u00a0 but this address was not even created until after Hillary was Secretary of State.\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n

The article notes:<\/p>\n

You can\u2019t send emails from an account that is not created or in place!<\/strong><\/p>\n

The only reasonable explanations for the receipt of emails from a domain that was not yet in place is, 1)\u00a0 the source name in the emails had been doctored and updated to an email account not yet in service, or 2) a utility was used to copy the emails in bulk from one account to another and in the process change some of the fields including the original email source.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Why would Hillary do this?\u00a0 The only explanation that makes sense is that the Hillary team was trying to eliminate or strip out all the classified markings in her emails, and in the process, they stripped out the old email addresses, and since that account didn\u2019t exist anymore, their process added the new address.<\/strong><\/p>\n

To put it plainly \u2013 Hillary attempted to doctor (i.e. change) her emails for some reason and in so doing she inadvertently changed her email address.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Clearly if Hillary was caught editing her emails by the FBI, then former FBI Director James Comey knew very well that Hillary intended to break the law!\u00a0 Three years ago Jim Comey lied to America!<\/strong><\/p>\n

Please follow the link to read the entire article. This scandal is complicated because of the technical aspects involved. The bottom line is simple–Hillary Clinton set up a secret server in order that many of her emails would not become public. We have a very limited idea of what is in those missing emails.<\/p>\n

In October 2016, Charles Krauthammer (who died in 2018) stated:<\/p>\n

CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: This brings us back full circle to the beginning. The question was originally: Why did she have the private server? She said convenience, obviously that was ridiculous\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n

It was obvious she was hiding something.<\/strong><\/p>\n

And think about it, she set it up in 2009, before becoming Secretary of State<\/a>. So, she anticipated having exchanges that she would not want anyone to see. So, we\u2019ve been asking ourselves on this set for a year almost, what exactly didn\u2019t she want people to see?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Well, now we know.<\/strong><\/p>\n

And as we speculated, the most plausible explanation was the rank corruption of the Clinton Foundation<\/a>, and its corrupt \u2014 I don\u2019t know if it\u2019s illegal, but corrupt relationship with the State Department<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

And her only defense as we saw earlier\u2013 the Democrats are saying, well, there was nothing she did\u2026 that was corrupted by donations. You can believe that if you want, but there\u2019s a reason that people give donations in large amounts, and that\u2019s to influence the outcome of decisions. So, this \u2014 we are getting unfolding to us, exactly what she anticipated having to hide, and it is really dirty business.<\/strong><\/p>\n

He was obviously ahead of his time in his thinking.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yesterday The Gateway Pundit posted an article about the interview notes of the FBI’s interview with Hillary Clinton’s attorney Heather Samuelson. Those notes have been uncovered due to the efforts of Judicial Watch. There are some problems with the facts … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1624,6325,4386,12209,10429,2340,12213,1457,5976,10095,2640,11283,2861,11716,5792],"class_list":["post-36528","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-charles-krauthammer","tag-clinton-foundation","tag-email-address","tag-emails","tag-fbi-director-james-comey","tag-gateway-pundit","tag-heather-samuelson","tag-hillary-clinton","tag-huma-abedin","tag-james-comey","tag-judicial-watch","tag-peter-strzok","tag-state-department","tag-the-gateway-pundit","tag-united-states-secretary-of-state"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36528","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=36528"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36528\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36529,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36528\/revisions\/36529"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=36528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=36528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=36528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}