{"id":36436,"date":"2019-06-28T14:48:22","date_gmt":"2019-06-28T18:48:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=36436"},"modified":"2019-06-28T14:48:22","modified_gmt":"2019-06-28T18:48:22","slug":"the-investigation-continues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=36436","title":{"rendered":"The Investigation Continues"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Judicial Watch has been instrumental in uncovering the misdeeds of the intelligence and Department of Justice communities during the Obama administration. They are quietly deposing many of the people involved as the result of a ruling by a district court that allows them to question many of the people involved in the Clinton email scandal.<\/p>\n<p>In a Press Release today, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/press-room\/press-releases\/judicial-watch-justice-department-granted-immunity-to-hillary-clintons-lawyer-who-destroyed-33000-emails\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Judicial Watch<\/a> reported:<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"CWH2SP\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Judicial Watch: Justice Department Granted Immunity To Hillary Clinton\u2019s Lawyer Who Destroyed 33,000 Emails<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><em>Heather Samuelson also testifies under oath in Judicial Watch court-ordered deposition that,\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><em>contrary to what she told the FBI, she was in fact aware that\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><em>Clinton used private email account as secretary of state<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>(Washington, DC) \u2013 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/\">Judicial Watch<\/a> announced today that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton\u2019s White House Liaison at the State Department, and later Clinton\u2019s personal lawyer, Heather Samuelson, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/document-archive\/heather-samuelson-deposition-01242-pg-65\/\">admitted<\/a> under oath that she was granted immunity by the U.S. Department of Justice in June 2016:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Samuelson<\/span>: I was provided limited production immunity by the Department of Justice.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Judicial Watch<\/span>: And when was that?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>***<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Samuelson<\/span>: My recollection, it was June 2015 [later corrected to 2016].<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>A complete copy of her deposition transcript is available <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/document-archive\/jw-v-state-heather-samuelson-deposition-01242\/\">here<\/a>. Samuelson also revealed that, contrary to what she <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/document-archive\/heather-samuelson-deposition-01242-pg-13\/\">told<\/a> the FBI in 2016, she was, in fact, aware that Sec. Clinton used a private email account while secretary of state:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Judicial Watch<\/span>: Ms. Samuelson, when did you first become aware that Secretary Clinton used the e-mail address hdr22@clintonemail.com while she was at the State Department?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Samuelson<\/span>: I believe I first became aware when either she e-mailed me on personal matters, such as wishing me happy birthday, or when I infrequently would receive e-mails forwarded to me from others at the department that had that e-mail address listed elsewhere in the document.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>***<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Judicial Watch<\/span>: Okay. And who were the State Department officials?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Samuelson<\/span>: I recall Cheryl Mills, but it could have been others.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Samuel\u2019s admission to Judicial Watch that she became aware of Clinton\u2019s non-State.gov emails during her service in the Clinton State Department White House Liaison Office during Clinton\u2019s tenure as secretary of state (January 2009 \u2013 February 2013) contradicts the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/document-archive\/jw-v-state-heather-samuelson-deposition-01242-exhibit\/\">notation<\/a> in the FBI\u2019s May 24, 2016 302 report on Samuelson\u2019s interview with FBI agents:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Samuelson did not become aware of Clinton\u2019s use of a private email account and server until she was serving as Clinton\u2019s personal attorney.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>After Clinton left office, Samuelson worked for a year in the office of the White House Counsel before becoming Clinton\u2019s personal attorney, where, in 2014, she was primarily responsible for conducting the review of Clinton emails and sorting out \u201cpersonal\u201d emails from government emails, which were returned to the State Department under the direction of Cheryl Mills and Clinton lawyer David Kendall.\u00a0 After the emails were returned to State, Clinton deleted the rest of the \u201cpersonal\u201d emails from her server, wiping it clean. Samuelson conducted the review of emails on her laptop, using Clinton server files downloaded from Platte River Networks, which housed the Clinton email server. Judicial Watch <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/document-archive\/heather-samuelson-deposition-01242-pg-58\/\">questioned her<\/a> about a \u201cgap\u201d in the emails she discovered:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Judicial Watch<\/span>: I believe you, during your interview with the FBI, you were asked about a gap in e-mails that you noticed in Secretary Clinton\u2019s e-mails from January 2009 to March of 2009. Do you recall that?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Samuelson<\/span>: I do.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Judicial Watch<\/span>: Okay. Can you explain to me what that gap was?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Samuelson<\/span>: My understanding is \u2014 well, I\u2019m sorry. I should say my recollection is when we received the documents \u2014 the file from Platte River Networks, there was a period of time that was missing in her e-mails. And that period of time was January 2009 to March 2009.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Judicial Watch<\/span>: And what did you do as the result of discovering this gap in the e-mails from January 2009 to March 2009?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>***<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Samuelson<\/span>: I asked Platte River why we did not have \u2014 why they did not provide those.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Judicial Watch<\/span>: And what did they tell you?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Samuelson<\/span>: They said they did not have that information.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Judicial Watch<\/span>: Did Platte River have access during 2014 to the server that housed Secretary Clinton\u2019s e-mails to her Clintonemail.com account \u2013<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>***<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>\u2013 and was there any discussion as to whether they could obtain Secretary Clinton\u2019s e-mails from that server from January 2009 to March 2009?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>***<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Samuelson<\/span>: I did ask them, and they said they did not have any e-mails from that period.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>Samuelson also <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/document-archive\/heather-samuelson-deposition-01242-pg-49\/\">testified<\/a> in her deposition that she created an \u201cafter action memo\u201d in or around December 2014 to memorialize the email search.\u00a0Samuelson\u2019s lawyer directed her not to answer questions about this memo.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>During Hillary Clinton\u2019s transition as secretary of state during her tenure, Samuelson was in charge of political-nomination (\u201cSchedule C\u201d) hires for Clinton\u2019s transition team at the State Department.\u00a0 When questioned by Judicial Watch lawyers about Brock Johnson, whom she hired as a special assistant to Secretary Clinton as a <a class=\"extl\" href=\"https:\/\/aclj.org\/executive-power\/aclj-obtains-documents-on-eve-of-president-obama-leaving-office-showing-collusion-with-the-clinton-foundation-on-attempted-closure-of-gitmo\">\u201cfavor\u201d<\/a> to controversial Clinton Foundation official <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/press-room\/press-releases\/judicial-watch-uncovers-new-batch-hillary-clinton-emails\/\">Doug Band<\/a> (co-founder of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/bulletins\/teneo-the-clinton-machine\/\">Teneo Strategy<\/a>\u00a0with Bill Clinton and a top official of the Clinton Foundation, including its Clinton Global Initiative), Samuelson testified that on occasion Band\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/document-archive\/jw-v-state-abedin-production-9-00684-pg-212\/\">sent referrals<\/a>\u00a0of individuals they should consider hiring. Johnson later worked, in coordination with the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/press-room\/press-releases\/judicial-watch-records-obtained-in-court-ordered-discovery-reveal-obama-white-house-tracking-foia-request-for-clinton-emails\/\">Obama White House<\/a>, when the State Department falsely responded to a Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) FOIA request that there were no records showing Clinton\u2019s email address.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>The deposition of Samuelson comes out of Judicial Watch\u2019s July 2014 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/press-room\/press-releases\/judicial-watch-announces-three-new-lawsuits-obama-administration-records-relating-benghazi-attack\/\">lawsuit<\/a>\u00a0filed after the U.S. Department of State failed to respond to a May 13, 2014 FOIA request (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/09-09-14-JW-v-State-01242-Benghazi-Rice.pdf\"><em>Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State<\/em><\/a>\u00a0(No. 1:14-cv-01242)). Judicial Watch seeks:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Copies of any updates and\/or talking points given to Ambassador Rice by the White House or any federal agency concerning, regarding, or related to the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Any and all records or communications concerning, regarding, or relating to talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack given to Ambassador Rice by the White House or any federal agency.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>On December 6, 2018, U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth <a href=\"http:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/JW-v.-State-Dept.-14-1242-Lamberth-ruling-1.pdf\">ordered<\/a> Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers and Clinton aides, as well as Heather Samuelson, to be deposed or answer written questions under oath. The court\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/press-room\/press-releases\/federal-judge-opens-discovery-into-clinton-email-usage\/\">ruled<\/a>\u00a0that the Clinton email system was \u201cone of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.\u201d Judicial Watch\u2019s discovery is centered upon whether Clinton intentionally attempted to evade the Freedom of Information Act by using a non-government email system and whether the State Department acted in bad faith in processing Judicial Watch\u2019s FOIA request for communications from Clinton\u2019s office.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>\u201cThe news that the Obama DOJ gave immunity to Heather Samuelson, Hillary Clinton\u2019s lawyer responsible for the infamous deletion of 33,000 emails, further confirms the sham FBI\/DOJ investigation of the Clinton email scandal,\u201d said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.\u00a0 \u201cAnd it is curious that Ms. Samuelson changed her story about what she knew and when about the Clinton email system.\u00a0 Attorney General Barr can\u2019t reopen the Clinton email investigation fast enough.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Judicial Watch seems to be the only organization that cares about corruption in our government.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Judicial Watch has been instrumental in uncovering the misdeeds of the intelligence and Department of Justice communities during the Obama administration. They are quietly deposing many of the people involved as the result of a ruling by a district court &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=36436\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[976,11124,886,6971,9565,2640,2207,269,135,8803,2861,3620,11070,10201],"class_list":["post-36436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-citizens-for-responsibility-and-ethics-in-washington","tag-clinton-emails","tag-freedom-of-information-act","tag-freedom-of-information-act-foia","tag-government-transparency","tag-judicial-watch","tag-judicialwatch","tag-justice-department","tag-obama-administration","tag-secretary-of-state","tag-state-department","tag-tom-fitton","tag-u-s-department-of-justice","tag-u-s-department-of-state"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=36436"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36436\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36437,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36436\/revisions\/36437"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=36436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=36436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=36436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}