There are still a lot of unanswered questions about the whole Russian collusion thing. I suspect the truth will gradually come out over the next two or three months, but I wonder if the dyed-in-the-wool Trump haters will believe the truth when it does come out. Meanwhile, there are some very interesting hints of things to come that periodically show up.<\/p>\n
The Gateway Pundit<\/a> posted an article today about some comments made by Trey Gowdy this morning on “Sunday Morning Futures” with Maria Bartiromo. There is a video in the article, but here are the relevant quotes:<\/p>\n Trey Gowdy<\/span>: There\u2019s a lot of serious questions that need to be asked. When did the Russian probe begin? When did it become hopelessly co-mingled with the Trump campaign? What was the factual predicate? Where are the transcripts, if any exist between the informants and the telephone calls to George Papadopoulos? Why the defensive briefing so inadequate of President Trump? Why didn\u2019t they do a follow-up defensive briefing? That doesn\u2019t even get to the whole FISA abuse in the fall. That\u2019s just the spring and summer of 2016. There\u2019s lots of questions and I hope Bill Barr finds someone who is skilled enough to answer them\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n Maria Bartiromo<\/span>: I\u2019m really glad you brought that up. The FBI\u2019s conversations with George Papadopoulos. Because when the FBI agent sends in informants to someone they\u2019re looking at, typically those conversations are recorded, right? Those people are wired.<\/strong><\/p>\n Trey Gowdy<\/span>: Yeah, if the bureau is going to sends in an informant the informant is going to be wired. If the bureau is monitoring telephone calls there\u2019s going to be a transcript of that.<\/em> Some of us are fortunate enough to know those transcripts exist. But they haven\u2019t been made public. And I think one in particular has the potential to actually persuade people\u2026 There is some information in these transcripts that has the potential to be a game changer if it\u2019s ever made public\u2026 If you have exculpatory evidence that was not shown to the court, that ain\u2019t good.<\/em> I\u2019ve seen it. Johnny (Ratcliffe) has seen it. I\u2019d love for your viewers to see it.<\/em> <\/strong><\/p>\n …Trey Gowdy<\/span>: We can call it a dossier. It sounds official. It\u2019s really something the National Enquirer<\/em> would blush if they printed it. So we know it was used four times by the United States government. What we\u2019re trying to figure out is if it was used a fifth time in the intelligence assessment and you\u2019ve got Brennan and Clapper and Comey, all three who know full well whether or not it was used in the intelligence assessment, but they\u2019re giving you different versions. So there is information that exists in December of 2016 and I hope anyone who has access to it, Senator Burr, Devin (Nunes), whoever is open minded, go look at that and I think it will help you understand whether or not that dossier, that unverified hearsay, was used five times or just four times by the United States government. It\u2019s pretty bad if it was used four times. It\u2019s REALLY BAD if it was used five times!<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n So what can we expect? More attacks on Attorney General Barr, attacks on John Durham, and almost manic attempts to remove President Trump from office will occur in an attempt to prevent the truth from getting out. If the truth is about to come out, look for a major distraction–an indictment of someone that can be somehow connected to President Trump or some such other distraction. The people involved in the misuse of government agencies during the Obama administration are going to play hard ball. The only way to prevent this abuse from happening in the future is to play hard ball back. It is going to get ugly, but if justice prevails, it will be fun to watch.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" There are still a lot of unanswered questions about the whole Russian collusion thing. I suspect the truth will gradually come out over the next two or three months, but I wonder if the dyed-in-the-wool Trump haters will believe the … Continue reading