The mainstream media has been less than enthusiastic about uncovering the root of the investigation into the Trump campaign and the Trump transition team. However, in spite of their efforts to bury the misdeeds of people in the Obama administration, the story is slowly beginning to come out. Most of the mainstream media is still avoiding telling the story, but you can still find it in some outlets.<\/p>\n
Yesterday The New York Post<\/a> posted an article by Andrew McCarthy that reminds us of some of the unseemly (and probably illegal) things that were going on in late 2015 through early 2017. I strongly suggest that you follow the link to read the entire article, but there are a few things that need to be highlighted.<\/p>\n The article notes:<\/p>\n In Senate testimony last week, Attorney General William Barr used the word \u201cspying\u201d to refer to the Obama administration<\/a>, um, spying on the Trump campaign<\/a>. Of course, fainting spells ensued, with the media-Democrat complex in meltdown. Former FBI Director Jim Comey tut-tutted that he was confused by Barr\u2019s comments, since the FBI\u2019s \u201csurveillance\u201d had been authorized by a court.<\/strong><\/p>\n (Needless to say, the former director neglected to mention that the court was not informed that the bureau\u2019s \u201cevidence\u201d for the warrants was unverified hearsay paid for by the Clinton campaign.)<\/strong><\/p>\n The pearl-clutching was predictable. Less than a year ago, we learned the Obama administration had used a confidential informant \u2014 a spy \u2014 to approach at least three Trump campaign officials in the months leading up to the 2016 election, straining to find proof that the campaign was complicit in the Kremlin\u2019s hacking of Democratic emails<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n But there is more to the story. I never understood the significance of some of the other events in the story. Andrew McCarthy explains them:<\/p>\n In the months prior to the election, as its Trump-Russia investigation ensued, some of the overtly political, rabidly anti-Trump FBI agents<\/a> running the probe discussed among themselves the prospect of stopping Trump, or of using the investigation as an \u201cinsurance policy\u201d in the highly unlikely event that Trump won the election. After Trump\u2019s stunning victory, the Obama administration had a dilemma: How could the investigation be maintained if Trump were told about it? After all, as president, he would have the power to shut it down.<\/strong><\/p>\n On Jan. 6, 2017, Comey, Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan and National Security Agency chief Michael Rogers visited President-elect Trump in New York to brief him on the Russia investigation.<\/strong><\/p>\n Just one day earlier, at the White House, Comey and then\u2013Acting Attorney General Sally Yates had met with the political leadership of the Obama administration \u2014 President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and national security adviser Susan Rice \u2014 to discuss withholding information about the Russia investigation from the incoming Trump administration.<\/strong><\/p>\n Rice put this sleight-of-hand a bit more delicately in the memo about the Oval Office meeting (written two weeks after the fact, as Rice was leaving her office minutes after Trump\u2019s inauguration):<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cPresident Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia. [Emphasis added.]\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n It is easy to understand why Obama officials needed to discuss withholding information from Trump. They knew that the Trump campaign \u2014 not just some individuals tangentially connected to the campaign \u2014 was the subject of an ongoing FBI counterintelligence probe. An informant had been run at campaign officials. The FISA surveillance of Page was underway \u2014 in fact, right before Trump\u2019s inauguration, the Obama administration obtained a new court warrant for 90 more days of spying.<\/strong><\/p>\n This memo is evidence that President Obama was at least aware of what was going on. That should be all over the front pages of every newspaper in the country. Somehow it isn’t.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The mainstream media has been less than enthusiastic about uncovering the root of the investigation into the Trump campaign and the Trump transition team. However, in spite of their efforts to bury the misdeeds of people in the Obama administration, … Continue reading