If you depend totally on the mainstream media for your news, you might be unaware that there was government surveillance of the Trump campaign and the Trump transition team. There is a school of thought that believes that Admiral Mike Rogers informed President Trump that Trump Tower was under electronic surveillance early in the Trump administration and that is the reason President Trump began doing business from New Jersey. I suspect that will be confirmed in the coming weeks. Meanwhile, there was some very interesting testimony on Capitol Hill by Attorney General William Barr regarding surveillance.<\/p>\n
CNS News<\/a> posted an article today about that testimony.<\/p>\n The article reports:<\/p>\n Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) asked Attorney General William Barr at a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing on Wednesday to \u201crephrase\u201d his use of the word \u201cspying\u201d to characterize the government targeting the Trump campaign.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cI want to give you a chance to rephrase something you said, because I think when the attorney general of the United States uses the word \u2018spying,\u2019 it\u2019s rather provocative, and in my view unnecessarily inflammatory, and I know what you\u2019re getting at, because you have explained yourself in terms of answering Senator Graham\u2019s questions and the questions of others,\u201d Schatz said.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cDo you want to rephrase what you\u2019re doing, because I think the word \u2018spying\u2019 could cause everybody in the cable news ecosystem to freak out, and I think it\u2019s necessary for you to be precise with your language here. You normally are, and I want to give you a chance to be especially precise here,\u201d the senator said.<\/strong><\/p>\n The article continues:<\/p>\n As CNS News.com reported<\/a>, Barr told Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) that \u201cspying\u201d occurred during the 2016 election.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cSo you\u2019re not suggesting though that spying occurred?\u201d Shaheen asked.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cI think there was \u2013 spying did occur. Yes, I think spying did occur, but the question is whether it was predicated, adequately predicated, and I\u2019m not suggesting it wasn\u2019t adequately predicated, but I need to explore that,\u201d the attorney general said.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cI think it\u2019s my obligation. Congress is usually very concerned about intelligence agencies and law enforcement agencies staying in their proper lane, and I want to make sure that happened,\u201d Barr said.<\/strong><\/p>\n I suspect that by the end of next week we will know a lot more about the surveillance of the Trump campaign and Trump transition team. The news media being what it is, I suspect a lot of information on this subject will be in the Good Friday news dump because the media is hoping most people will be too preoccupied with Easter to see it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" If you depend totally on the mainstream media for your news, you might be unaware that there was government surveillance of the Trump campaign and the Trump transition team. There is a school of thought that believes that Admiral Mike … Continue reading