{"id":35785,"date":"2019-04-03T16:41:40","date_gmt":"2019-04-03T20:41:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=35785"},"modified":"2019-04-03T16:41:40","modified_gmt":"2019-04-03T20:41:40","slug":"in-case-you-were-wondering-if-it-was-political","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=35785","title":{"rendered":"In Case You Were Wondering If It Was Political…"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Monday, The Washington Examiner<\/a> posted an article about the Democrats’ calls to make the entire Mueller Report public, including source information, Grand Jury testimony, etc. Well, there are some pretty strict rules protecting the secrecy of Grand Jury testimony, and it is quite possible that disclosing other information could be a problem for our intelligence services (and possibly some foreign intelligence services). It should be noted that in their calls for transparency I haven’t heard them ask that the FISA warrants and background information on those warrants be made public. However, this call for transparency on the part of the Democrats is an interesting contrast to their reactions to previous Special Counsel reports.<\/p>\n

The article reports:<\/p>\n

R<\/span>ep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, is the leading Democrat demanding the release of the Mueller Report \u201cin its entirety\u201d without redactions.<\/strong><\/p>\n

His committee is planning to subpoena the Justice Department for the full report.<\/strong><\/p>\n

But back in 1998, as a member of the same committee, he vociferously opposed the release of the full Starr Report, saying that \u201cas a matter of decency and protecting people\u2019s privacy rights, people who may be totally innocent third parties, what must not be released at all.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ken Starr, the independent counsel investigating then-President Bill Clinton, delivered his report to Congress on Sept. 9, 1998. That night, Nadler went on Charlie Rose’s show<\/a> to push back against the Republican demand that the voluminous report should be made public. \u201cIt\u2019s grand jury material. It represents statements which may or may not be true by various witnesses,” Nadler said. “Salacious material. All kinds of material that it would be unfair to release,\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

What Nadler, 71, said in 1998 echoes what Attorney General William Barr told Congress last week. Barr, 68, wrote that he might redact grand jury testimony, information related to ongoing investigations, sensitive or classified information, and \u201cinformation that would unduly infringe on the personal privacy and reputational interests of peripheral third parties\u201d from the report that he provides to Congress and the public<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Representative Nadler does not want the entire report made public–he wants the Democrats to get the entire report so that they can leak misleading parts of the report and make the scandal last until the 2020 election. The is a political game.<\/p>\n

The article concludes:<\/p>\n

Special counsel Mueller declined to charge anyone associated with the Trump campaign of coordination with the Russians, but did not reach a decision on obstruction. Attorney General Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein concluded that Trump had not obstructed justice.<\/strong><\/p>\n

How can you have obstruction when there was no crime?<\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On Monday, The Washington Examiner posted an article about the Democrats’ calls to make the entire Mueller Report public, including source information, Grand Jury testimony, etc. Well, there are some pretty strict rules protecting the secrecy of Grand Jury testimony, … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3240,853,10687,1167,11593,4803,12026,9757,11698,4626,2720,430],"class_list":["post-35785","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-classified-information","tag-democrats","tag-fisa-warrant","tag-grand-jury","tag-house-judiciary-committee","tag-jerrold-nadler","tag-mueller-report","tag-president-bill-clinton","tag-rod-rosenstein","tag-russians","tag-the-washington-examiner","tag-washington-examiner"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=35785"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35785\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35787,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35785\/revisions\/35787"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=35785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=35785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=35785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}