{"id":32140,"date":"2017-12-11T15:25:03","date_gmt":"2017-12-11T20:25:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=32140"},"modified":"2017-12-11T15:25:03","modified_gmt":"2017-12-11T20:25:03","slug":"the-collusion-without-a-crime","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=32140","title":{"rendered":"The Collusion Without A Crime"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sometimes it is very easy to overlook the obvious when you in the middle of dealing with an intense situation. The <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Robert Mueller\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Robert_Mueller\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener wikipedia\">Mueller<\/a> investigation might be considered an intense situation, and there is something obvious being overlooked. <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Andrew McCarthy\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Andrew_McCarthy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener wikipedia\">Andrew McCarthy<\/a> pointed it out in an article at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/article\/454515\/russian-cyberespionage-does-mueller-have-proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">National Review<\/a> today.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. McCarthy points out that after a year of investigation, there is no evidence of Russian cyberespionage. If there is no evidence of cyberespionage, how can there be collusion with cyberespionage? Remember, the <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Federal Bureau of Investigation\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=38.895216,-77.025131&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=38.895216,-77.025131 (Federal%20Bureau%20of%20Investigation)&amp;t=h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"geolocation noopener\">FBI<\/a> was never allowed to examine the Democratic National Committee (DNC) servers&#8211;the examination was done by a group hired by the DNC. If I were guilty of a crime and the FBI wanted to search my house, would they let me hire a friend to do the searching? Somehow I don&#8217;t think so.<\/p>\n<p>The article states:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>We have paid too much attention to the so-called collusion component of the probe \u2014 speculation about Trump-campaign coordination in <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Russia\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=55.75,37.6166666667&amp;spn=0.1,0.1&amp;q=55.75,37.6166666667 (Russia)&amp;t=h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"geolocation noopener\">Russia<\/a>\u2019s perfidy. There appears to be no proof of that sort of collusion. Because it has been our focus, though, Mueller has gotten a free pass on a defect that would be fatal to any related prosecution theory: He cannot <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Reasonable doubt\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Reasonable_doubt\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener wikipedia\">prove beyond a reasonable doubt<\/a> that Russia is guilty of hacking the Democratic National Committee and prominent <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Democratic Party (United States)\" href=\"http:\/\/senate.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"homepage noopener\">Democrats<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>This doesn\u2019t mean it didn\u2019t happen \u2014 like the U.S. intelligence agencies, I\u2019m assuming it did, and that Russia should continue to be the subject of intense government counterintelligence efforts. The point is that Mueller can\u2019t prove it in court, which is the only thing for which a prosecutor is needed. If he can\u2019t establish to the required <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Legal burden of proof\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Legal_burden_of_proof\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener wikipedia\">standard of proof<\/a> that Russia conducted an espionage attack on the election, it is impossible to prove that anyone conspired with Russia to do so. There is no criminal case.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It is important to remember that when <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"United States Deputy Attorney General\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/United_States_Deputy_Attorney_General\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener wikipedia\">Deputy Attorney General<\/a> Rod Rosenstein appointed a special counsel, he did not specify a crime. That alone should have shut down the investigation immediately&#8211;what are you investigating? Are you simply on a fishing expedition hoping you can find someone who is guilty of something?<\/p>\n<p>The article concludes:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>That is another good reason to deduce that Mueller\u2019s team is playing a long game \u2014 impeachment, not prosecution. As a practical matter, there is no prospect of articles of impeachment unless Democrats win the 2018 midterms. So, if you thought or hoped Mueller\u2019s investigation would be winding down anytime soon, disabuse yourself. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>Still, after 18 months of investigating, it would be worth putting two simple questions to Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein, who \u2014 at least nominally \u2014 supervises Special Counsel Mueller: 1) Does the <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"United States Department of Justice\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=38.8933333333,-77.025&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=38.8933333333,-77.025 (United%20States%20Department%20of%20Justice)&amp;t=h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"geolocation noopener\">Justice Department<\/a> believe, contrary to the apparent concessions in the intelligence agencies\u2019 Russia report, that the government can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Russia is guilty cyberespionage against the 2016 election; and 2) if not, what is the point of Mueller\u2019s investigation?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Republican party almost destroyed itself when they tried to impeach <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Bill Clinton\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bill_Clinton\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener wikipedia\">President Clinton<\/a> because the public liked him (and the media was on his side). The Democrats need to learn from that&#8211;the public trusts President Trump more than Congress or the media. If the Democrats attempt to impeach him, they will lose seats in 2020 and their presidential candidate will not have a chance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sometimes it is very easy to overlook the obvious when you in the middle of dealing with an intense situation. The Mueller investigation might be considered an intense situation, and there is something obvious being overlooked. Andrew McCarthy pointed it &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=32140\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[108,3357,420,1457,10095,3035,68],"class_list":["post-32140","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-andrew-mccarthy","tag-donald-trump","tag-federal-bureau-of-investigation","tag-hillary-clinton","tag-james-comey","tag-robert-mueller","tag-united-states-department-of-justice"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32140","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=32140"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32140\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32143,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32140\/revisions\/32143"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=32140"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=32140"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=32140"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}