{"id":31479,"date":"2017-09-03T15:05:33","date_gmt":"2017-09-03T19:05:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=31479"},"modified":"2017-09-03T15:05:33","modified_gmt":"2017-09-03T19:05:33","slug":"this-just-gets-uglier","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=31479","title":{"rendered":"This Just Gets Uglier"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Some serious and relevant information has come out in the past few days regarding the <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Federal Bureau of Investigation\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=38.895216,-77.025131&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=38.895216,-77.025131 (Federal%20Bureau%20of%20Investigation)&amp;t=h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"geolocation noopener\">Federal Bureau of Investigation&#8217;s<\/a> (FBI) handling of the investigation into <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Hillary Clinton\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hillary_Clinton\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia noopener\">Hillary Clinton&#8217;s<\/a> private email server and the documents that were not turned over to the people investigating the server. On Friday, I posted an article dealing with the information that the decision to exonerate Hillary Clinton of any wrongdoing was made before the investigation was complete. That is true, but I missed to root of the problem.<\/p>\n<p>The following video was posted at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?time_continue=4&amp;v=BM7xIQ7pSIQ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">YouTube<\/a> on Thursday. It further explains what has recently been revealed:<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/BM7xIQ7pSIQ\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Yesterday <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Andrew Z. McCarty\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Andrew_Z._McCarty\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia noopener\">Andrew McCarty<\/a> posted an article at<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/corner\/451053\/not-comeys-decision-exonerate-hillary-obamas-decision\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> National Review<\/a> that pointed out some things that I had overlooked.<\/p>\n<p>The article at National Review states:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>The thing to understand, what has always been the most important thing to understand, is that <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"James Comey\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/James_Comey\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia noopener\">Jim Comey<\/a> was out in front, but he was not calling the shots. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>On the right, the commentariat is in full-throttle outrage over the revelation that former FBI Director Comey began drafting his statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in April 2016 \u2013 more than two months before he delivered the statement at his now famous July 5 press conference. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>The news appears in a letter written to new FBI Director Christopher Wray by two senior Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans, Chairman Chuck Grassley and <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Lindsey Graham\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Lindsey_Graham\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia noopener\">Senator Lindsey Graham<\/a>. Pundits and the Trump administration are shrieking because this indicates the decision to give the Democrats\u2019 nominee a pass was clearly made long before the investigation was over, and even long before key witnesses, including Clinton herself, were interviewed.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Andrew McCarthy\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Andrew_McCarthy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia noopener\">Andrew McCarthy<\/a> reminds us of one of his previous statements:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>On April 10, 2016, <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"WhiteHouse.gov\" href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"homepage noopener\">President Obama<\/a> publicly stated that Hillary Clinton had shown \u201ccarelessness\u201d in using a private e-mail server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security (which is not an element of the [criminal statutes relevant to her e-mail scandal]). The president acknowledged that classified information had been transmitted via Secretary Clinton\u2019s server, but he suggested that, in the greater scheme of things, its importance had been vastly overstated.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This is the statement we need to be looking at. This was President Obama telling the FBI to &#8216;stand down&#8217; on the investigation. It was later revealed that President Obama had communicated with Mrs. Clinton on her private email server. It is quite possible that these communications included classified information. Therefore, if Hillary Clinton was guilty of mishandling classified information, so was President Obama. Therefore, the FBI had to find a way not to charge Mrs. Clinton with a crime (regardless of the fact that she had obviously committed one). The moral of the story is, &#8220;If you are going to do something illegal, make sure a very powerful person does it with you.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Andrew McCarthy concludes:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>Bottom line: In April, President Obama and his <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"United States Department of Justice\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=38.8933333333,-77.025&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=38.8933333333,-77.025 (United%20States%20Department%20of%20Justice)&amp;t=h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"geolocation noopener\">Justice Department<\/a> adopted a Hillary Clinton defense strategy of concocting a crime no one was claiming Clinton had committed: to wit, transmitting classified information with an intent to harm the <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"United States\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=38.8833333333,-77.0166666667&amp;spn=0.1,0.1&amp;q=38.8833333333,-77.0166666667 (United%20States)&amp;t=h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"geolocation noopener\">United States<\/a>. With media-Democrat complex help, they peddled the narrative that she could not be convicted absent this \u201cmalicious intent,\u201d in a desperate effort to make the publicly known evidence seem weak. Meanwhile, they quietly hamstrung FBI case investigators in order to frustrate the evidence-gathering process. When damning proof nevertheless mounted, the Obama administration dismissed the whole debacle by rewriting the statute (to impose an imaginary intent standard) and by offering absurd rationalizations for not applying the statute as written. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>That plan was in place and already being implemented when Director Comey began drafting the \u201cfindings\u201d he would announce months later. But it was not Comey\u2019s plan. It was Obama\u2019s plan.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>And that is the reason we will probably never see Mrs. Clinton held accountable for her mishandling of classified information.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Some serious and relevant information has come out in the past few days regarding the Federal Bureau of Investigation&#8217;s (FBI) handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton&#8217;s private email server and the documents that were not turned over to the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=31479\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[108,97,3357,790,420,1457,10332,285,68],"class_list":["post-31479","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-andrew-mccarthy","tag-barack-obama","tag-donald-trump","tag-fbi","tag-federal-bureau-of-investigation","tag-hillary-clinton","tag-jim-comey","tag-united-states","tag-united-states-department-of-justice"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31479","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=31479"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31479\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31480,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31479\/revisions\/31480"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=31479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=31479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=31479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}