{"id":31156,"date":"2017-07-07T11:51:55","date_gmt":"2017-07-07T15:51:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=31156"},"modified":"2017-07-07T11:52:22","modified_gmt":"2017-07-07T15:52:22","slug":"there-seems-to-be-a-discrepancy-here","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=31156","title":{"rendered":"There Seems To Be A Discrepancy Here"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When there is unequal justice under the law, we need to find the reason for it. It seems as if <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"United States Congress\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=38.8897222222,-77.0088888889&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=38.8897222222,-77.0088888889 (United%20States%20Congress)&amp;t=h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"geolocation noopener\">Congress<\/a> may be moving in that direction regarding Hillary Clinton&#8217;s mishandling of <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Classified information\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Classified_information\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia noopener\">classified information<\/a>. The guidelines for handling classified information are clear, and the penalties for mishandling it are clear. Former FBI Director <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"James Comey\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/James_Comey\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia noopener\">James Comey<\/a> outlined the case against <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Hillary Clinton\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hillary_Clinton\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia noopener\">Mrs. Clinton<\/a>, then chose not to prosecute her for breaking the law. She was not even prosecuted after classified information she had access to was found on a laptop of someone who was not cleared to view the information. So what is the kingpin that will unravel the logic behind this situation? It seems as if Congress may be about to find that out.<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"New York Post\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nypost.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"homepage noopener\">The New York Post<\/a> posted an article about the testimony <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Loretta Lynch\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Loretta_Lynch\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia noopener\">Loretta Lynch<\/a> gave to Congress last year.<\/p>\n<p>The article reports:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>When former <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Attorney general\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Attorney_general\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia noopener\">Attorney General<\/a> Loretta Lynch testified last year about her decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information, she swore she never talked to \u201canyone\u201d on the <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hillary_Clinton_presidential_campaign%2C_2016\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia noopener\">Clinton campaign<\/a>. That categorical denial, though made in response to a series of questions about whether she spoke with Clintonworld about remaining attorney general if Hillary won the election, could come back to haunt her.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>The <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/United_States_Senate_Committee_on_the_Judiciary\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia noopener\">Senate Judiciary Committee<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/nypost.com\/2017\/06\/23\/senate-panel-looking-into-lynchs-involvement-in-clinton-email-probe\/\">which has launched a bipartisan investigation into Lynch for possible obstruction of justice<\/a>, recently learned of the existence of a document indicating Lynch assured the political director of Clinton\u2019s campaign she wouldn\u2019t let <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Federal Bureau of Investigation\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=38.895216,-77.025131&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=38.895216,-77.025131 (Federal%20Bureau%20of%20Investigation)&amp;t=h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"geolocation noopener\">FBI agents<\/a> \u201cgo too far\u201d in probing the former secretary of state.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>There is also the matter of the meeting between Loretta Lynch and <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Bill Clinton\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bill_Clinton\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia noopener\">Bill Clinton<\/a> in Ms. Lynch&#8217;s airplane in Phoenix. The only reason we know about that meeting is that a reporter was doing his job and reported it. The meeting was totally inappropriate as Mrs. Clinton was under investigation at the time by Ms. Lynch.<\/p>\n<p>There are a lot of people who want the investigation into the handling of Mrs. Clinton&#8217;s email scandal to go away. It has been like pulling teeth for Congress to get even as far as it has gotten. However, the thing we need to remember is that equal justice under the law is part of the foundation of our republic. When that principle is ignored, the republic is weakened.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When there is unequal justice under the law, we need to find the reason for it. It seems as if Congress may be moving in that direction regarding Hillary Clinton&#8217;s mishandling of classified information. The guidelines for handling classified information &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=31156\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[691,3640,420,1457,10095,8436,68,1455],"class_list":["post-31156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-chuck-grassley","tag-dianne-feinstein","tag-federal-bureau-of-investigation","tag-hillary-clinton","tag-james-comey","tag-loretta-lynch","tag-united-states-department-of-justice","tag-united-states-senate-committee-on-the-judiciary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=31156"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31156\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31158,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31156\/revisions\/31158"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=31156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=31156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=31156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}