{"id":30272,"date":"2017-02-18T10:51:22","date_gmt":"2017-02-18T15:51:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=30272"},"modified":"2017-02-18T10:51:22","modified_gmt":"2017-02-18T15:51:22","slug":"a-question-that-needs-to-be-asked","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=30272","title":{"rendered":"A Question That Needs To Be Asked"},"content":{"rendered":"

You can’t put toothpaste back in the tube, but you can ask questions about how it got out of the tube in the first place. Andrew McCarthy<\/a> posted an article at National Review<\/a> today that asks a very obvious, but overlooked in the media, question about what happened to General Flynn.<\/p>\n

Andrew McCarthy is a lawyer experienced in dealing the terrorism and other national security matters. In the article at National Review, he asks, “Why Was the FBI Investigating General Flynn?”<\/p>\n

The contact between General Flynn and Russian ambassador<\/a> Kislyak was appropriate–General Flynn was slated to be National Security Advisor<\/a> under President<\/a> Trump. He was making contacts in preparation for taking that job. It is also understandable that the conversation would have been recorded–the article states, “We are told that the FBI was monitoring the phone calls of Russian ambassador Kislyak under FISA<\/a>. Makes sense \u2014 he\u2019s an overt foreign agent from a hostile government.”<\/p>\n

However, there is more to the story.<\/p>\n

The article reports:<\/p>\n

The call to Kislyak, of course, was intercepted. No doubt the calls of other American<\/a> officials who have perfectly valid reasons to call Russian diplomats have been intercepted. It is the FBI\u2019s scrupulous practice to keep the identities of such interceptees confidential. So why single Flynn out for identification, and for investigation? FBI agents<\/a> did not need to \u201cgrill\u201d Flynn in order to learn about the call \u2014 they had a recording of the call. They also knew there was nothing untoward about the call. We know that from the Times report \u2014 a report that suggests an unseemly conjoining of investigative power to partisan politics.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n
The article also notes the timing of these events. The information about the phone call was released at a point where it was designed to do the most damage. We had the FBI and the press working together to undermine the new President.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The article concludes:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
And the FBI has no business probing the veracity of public statements made by presidential administrations for political purposes \u2014 something it certainly resisted doing during the Obama administration<\/a>. <\/strong><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
There appears to have been no foreign-intelligence or criminal-investigative purpose served by the FBI\u2019s interrogation of General Flynn. It is easy to see why Democrats would want to portray Flynn\u2019s contact with the Russian ambassador as worthy of an FBI investigation. But why did the FBI and the Justice Department<\/a> investigate Flynn \u2014 and why did \u201cofficials\u201d make sure the press found out about it?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Please follow the link to read the entire article. It is rather lengthy but explains the matter much more clearly and fully than I did. It is time for all of us to become our own news reporters and investigate everything the major media tells us. Otherwise we will tend to believe the lies the press is promoting.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

You can’t put toothpaste back in the tube, but you can ask questions about how it got out of the tube in the first place. Andrew McCarthy posted an article at National Review today that asks a very obvious, but … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[108,3357,420,10628,4490,68,211],"class_list":["post-30272","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-andrew-mccarthy","tag-donald-trump","tag-federal-bureau-of-investigation","tag-national-security-advisor-united-states","tag-president-of-the-united-states","tag-united-states-department-of-justice","tag-white-house"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30272","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=30272"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30272\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30273,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30272\/revisions\/30273"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=30272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=30272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=30272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}