{"id":29389,"date":"2016-10-08T12:17:18","date_gmt":"2016-10-08T16:17:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=29389"},"modified":"2016-10-08T12:17:37","modified_gmt":"2016-10-08T16:17:37","slug":"what-would-be-the-results-of-this-goal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=29389","title":{"rendered":"What Would Be The Result Of This Goal?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On September 13th, <a href=\"http:\/\/dailysignal.com\/2016\/09\/13\/conservatives-should-worry-democrat-senator-says-progressive-supreme-court-top-goal\/\" target=\"_blank\">The Daily Signal<\/a> posted an article about one of the goals of the current <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Democratic Party (United States)\" href=\"http:\/\/senate.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"homepage\">Democratic Party<\/a>. This explains one of the reasons this coming election is so important.<\/p>\n<p>The article reports:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong><a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Charles Schumer\" href=\"http:\/\/schumer.senate.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"homepage\">Sen. Chuck Schumer<\/a> has reminded us just how important the upcoming presidential election will be in shaping the federal judiciary, calling getting a progressive <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Supreme Court of the United States\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=38.8905555556,-77.0044444444&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=38.8905555556,-77.0044444444 (Supreme%20Court%20of%20the%20United%20States)&amp;t=h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"geolocation\">Supreme Court<\/a> his \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.rollcall.com\/news\/politics\/schumer-calls-progressive-supreme-court-number-one-goal\">number one goal<\/a>.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>So what would a progressive Supreme Court mean?<\/p>\n<p>The article cites a few examples:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>Schumer specifically criticized a 2013 decision involving a 5-4 decision about voting rights. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/12pdf\/12-96_6k47.pdf\">Shelby County v. Holder<\/a>, the court held that Section 4 of the Voting Right Act, which set forth a 40-year-old coverage formula laying out which states needed to get preapproval from the federal government before making any changes in their voting laws, was unconstitutional.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>The court explained that <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"United States Congress\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=38.8897222222,-77.0088888889&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=38.8897222222,-77.0088888889 (United%20States%20Congress)&amp;t=h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"geolocation\">Congress<\/a> \u201cdid not use the record it compiled to shape a coverage formula grounded in current conditions\u201d and that the formula had \u201cno logical relation to the present day.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>As <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rollcall.com\/news\/politics\/schumer-calls-progressive-supreme-court-number-one-goal\">Roll Call reported<\/a>, Schumer \u201cpredicted that the Shelby County decision on voting rights would be overturned by a Supreme Court with the kind of progressive justices he would prioritize confirming as majority leader.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A progressive Supreme Court would, therefore, be willing to infringe on states&#8217; rights.<\/p>\n<p>The article further reports:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>The high court has been closely divided on a number of contentious issues in recent years: the Second Amendment (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/07pdf\/07-290.pdf\">Heller<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/09pdf\/08-1521.pdf\">McDonald<\/a>), religious liberty (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/13pdf\/13-354_olp1.pdf\">Hobby Lobby<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/13pdf\/12-696_bpm1.pdf\">Town of Greece<\/a>), the <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"First Amendment to the United States Constitution\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia\">First Amendment<\/a> (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/09pdf\/08-205.pdf\">Citizens United<\/a>), racial preferences (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberglaw.com\/public\/desktop\/document\/Fisher_v_Univ_of_Tex_at_Austin_No_11345_2013_BL_167358_118_FEP_Ca?1472505005\">Fisher I<\/a>), and the death penalty (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/14pdf\/14-7955_aplc.pdf\">Glossip<\/a>), among others. One vote made the difference in each of these cases, which most consider as victories for the conservative wing of the court.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Our basic liberties are at stake. Are we going to follow the Constitution or are we going to become a banana republic? Consider this when you vote.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On September 13th, The Daily Signal posted an article about one of the goals of the current Democratic Party. This explains one of the reasons this coming election is so important. The article reports: Sen. Chuck Schumer has reminded us &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=29389\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3038,712,10396,933,10397],"class_list":["post-29389","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-chuck-schumer","tag-democratic-party-united-states","tag-shelby-county-v-holder","tag-supreme-court-of-the-united-states","tag-the-daily-signal"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=29389"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29389\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29391,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29389\/revisions\/29391"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=29389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=29389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=29389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}