{"id":29359,"date":"2016-10-03T20:40:11","date_gmt":"2016-10-04T00:40:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=29359"},"modified":"2016-10-03T20:40:11","modified_gmt":"2016-10-04T00:40:11","slug":"why-this-story-keeps-coming-back","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=29359","title":{"rendered":"Why This Story Keeps Coming Back"},"content":{"rendered":"

Even during a political campaign<\/a>, most stories have a limited life-span. However, that doesn’t seem to be the case with Hillary Clinton’s<\/a> emails and private server. Clinton supporters see this as just another unwarranted attack on this innocent person, but unfortunately the facts that are slowly leaking out tell a very different story.<\/p>\n

Townhall<\/a> posted a story tonight stating that the FBI<\/a> made a side deal with some of the witnesses in the email investigation to destroy their laptop computers. That seems odd to say the least. Usually evidence in an investigation is not destroyed very quickly.<\/p>\n

The article at Townhall<\/a> points out some irregularities in the investigation:<\/p>\n

This was just your average FBI investigation, you see, in which\u00a0the same woman<\/a> was: (1)\u00a0a subject<\/a> of the probe, (2) a key witness in the probe, (3) a dubious immunity recipient, and (4) a lawyer<\/a> to the primary subject — who was allowed to sit in on her quasi-client’s interview with investigators. And if that wasn’t enough, the FBI reportedly agreed to permanently destroy two pieces of evidence after reviewing them. I’ll defer to law enforcement experts as to whether or not this sort of thing is remotely standard practice, but to a layperson, it seems like\u00a0yet another peculiarity<\/a> surrounding this case.<\/strong><\/p>\n

On Saturday, Andrew McCarthy<\/a> posted an article at National Review<\/a> with his comments on the investigation. Please follow the link above to read the entire article–it details some of the technicalities in the investigation that were obviously mishandled.<\/p>\n

The article points out:<\/p>\n

Second, though Comey<\/a> says the FBI is in no position to enforce attorney ethical rules that barred Mills from representing Clinton at the interview, this was not just an FBI interview. According to the director, several Justice Department<\/a> lawyers also participated. Those lawyers, too, are bound by the ethical rules. They had an obligation to object to this unseemly arrangement and to do what was in their considerable power to prevent it. <\/strong><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Finally, as Shannen Coffin has pointed out, Mills was not just violating an ethical rule. Her representation of Clinton runs afoul of federal law. Section 207 of the penal code makes it a crime for a former government official to attempt to influence the government on behalf of another person in a matter in which the former official was heavily involved while working for the government. It was against the law for Mills, as an attorney, to attempt to influence the Justice Department\u2019s consideration of the case against Clinton.<\/strong><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The reason this scandal will not go away is that the investigation has been compromised at every turn. We don’t have a “Watergate” media that is willing to report on the obstructionism and lying that has been going on both by Hillary Clinton and the Obama Administration<\/a>. There are still a few Americans left who believe in the integrity of the FBI and want to know why that integrity was seemingly compromised.<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Even during a political campaign, most stories have a limited life-span. However, that doesn’t seem to be the case with Hillary Clinton’s emails and private server. Clinton supporters see this as just another unwarranted attack on this innocent person, but … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[108,420,1457,10312,10095,68],"class_list":["post-29359","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-andrew-mccarthy","tag-federal-bureau-of-investigation","tag-hillary-clinton","tag-hillary-clinton-email-controversy","tag-james-comey","tag-united-states-department-of-justice"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29359","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=29359"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29359\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29360,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29359\/revisions\/29360"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=29359"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=29359"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=29359"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}