As the media covers the fact that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has finally agreed to hand over her computer server to the Justice Department, let’s back up a minute and look at the history of Secretary Clinton and her server.<\/p>\n
On March 30, Byron York posted a story at The Washington Examiner<\/a> that included the following:<\/p>\n The subpoena story began on Sept. 20, 2012, nine days after the attacks. Rep. Jason Chaffetz<\/a>, who was chairman of the House Oversight Committee’s Subcommittee on National Security, Homeland Defense and Foreign Operations<\/a>, sent a letter to then-Secretary of State Clinton asking for “all information \u2026 related to the attack on the consulate.” Chaffetz specifically asked for all analyses, whether classified or unclassified, on the security situation leading up to the Benghazi attack<\/a>, plus, among other things, all analyses that either supported or contradicted UN Ambassador Susan Rice’s assertion that the attack was the spontaneous result of outrage over an anti-Muslim video. The short version of the letter was that Chaffetz demanded “all information” on Benghazi.<\/strong><\/p>\n Just to be clear, the Chaffetz letter included standard language telling Clinton, “In complying with this request, you are required to produce all responsive documents that are in your possession, custody, or control, whether held by you or your past or present agents, employees, and representatives acting on your behalf.”<\/strong><\/p>\n …The routine got old fast. Republicans (and Democrats, for that matter) couldn’t copy the documents and couldn’t use them at hearings. Chaffetz and Rep. Darrell Issa<\/a>, then the chairman of the full Oversight and Government Reform Committee<\/a>, became frustrated. In response to their protests, the State Department<\/a> stressed that it had made all the relevant documents available, even if under restrictive conditions. State has “provided Congress<\/a> with access to documents, comprising over 25,000 pages to date, including communications of senior Department officials regarding the security situation in Benghazi,” State official Thomas Gibbons wrote to Issa on March 29, 2013.<\/strong><\/p>\n That did nothing to quiet Republican unhappiness. The problem came to a head on Aug. 1, 2013, when the committee issued a subpoena to the State Department. (It was officially directed to new Secretary of State John Kerry<\/a>.)<\/strong><\/p>\n Note that the date of the subpoena was August 1, 2013–more than two years ago.<\/p>\n Yesterday The New York Post<\/a> posted a story that included the following:<\/p>\n Security experts warned Wednesday that the chances of recovering deleted information from Hillary Rodham Clinton\u2019s home e-mail server are slim \u2014 unless she did a lousy scrubbing job.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cBeing the fact that this is Hillary Clinton with significant resources and a reputation to uphold, I would say that those who are seeking out additional information on the servers \u2026 would have a very difficult time finding something,\u201d Robert Siciliano, an online-security expert, told The Post.<\/strong><\/p>\n When items are deleted they still leave a trace \u2014 or \u201cbread crumbs,\u201d as \u00adSiciliano put it \u2014 but a skilled person doing the deleting can ensure that fewer crumbs are left to recreate the missing documents.<\/strong><\/p>\n Does anyone really believe that the Justice Department is going to uphold the law in regard to Secretary Clinton? This case will be a litmus case to see if President Obama<\/a> actually supports the presidential candidacy of Hillary Clinton. I suspect the President Obama does not want Hillary Clinton to become President, but I also suspect he has seen the list of people who have opposed the Clintons in the past and faced severe consequences. Watching this unfold will be extremely educational to all of us.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" As the media covers the fact that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has finally agreed to hand over her computer server to the Justice Department, let’s back up a minute and look at the history of Secretary Clinton and … Continue reading