{"id":2609,"date":"2011-01-22T09:22:36","date_gmt":"2011-01-22T09:22:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=2609"},"modified":"2011-01-22T09:22:36","modified_gmt":"2011-01-22T09:22:36","slug":"charles_krauthammer_on_the_rep","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=2609","title":{"rendered":"Charles Krauthammer On The Repeal Of Obamacare"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On Friday, Charles Krauthammer posted a column at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2011\/01\/20\/AR2011012003687.html?hpid=opinionsbox1\">Washington Post<\/a>&nbsp;about the repeal of Obamacare.&nbsp; He points out that the Congressional Budget Office numbers the Democrats are using to say that repealing Obamacare will increase the deficit actually say something else.&nbsp; Dr. Krauthammer points out that the way Obamacare decreases the deficit is to raise taxes by&nbsp; $770 billion while increasing spending by $540 billion.&nbsp; It might also be noted that tax revenues are predicted&#8211;not guaranteed&#8211;while spending is guaranteed to be at least what is predicted, if not more.&nbsp; To see an example of this, follow the link to a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/2010\/11\/whooops-another-healthcare-pre.html\">rightwinggranny.com<\/a>&nbsp;on November 12, 2010, detailing what has happened to the plan to insure people with pre-existing medical conditions.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>Dr. Krauthammer points out:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px\" dir=\"ltr\">\n<p><em>&#8220;In fact, the whole Obamacare bill was gamed to produce a favorable CBO number. Most glaringly, the entitlement it creates &#8211; government-subsidized health insurance for 32 million Americans &#8211; doesn&#8217;t kick in until 2014. That was deliberately designed so any projection for this decade would cover only six years of expenditures &#8211; while that same 10-year projection would capture 10 years of revenue. With 10 years of money inflow vs. six years of outflow, the result is a positive &#8211; i.e., deficit-reducing &#8211; number. Surprise.&#8221; <\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The column by Dr. Krauthammer&nbsp;reminds&nbsp;Congress&nbsp;that&nbsp;they should not repeal Obamacare without offering a replacement.&nbsp; He conludes:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px\" dir=\"ltr\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><em>&#8220;But amending an insanely complicated, contradictory, incoherent and arbitrary 2,000-page bill that will generate tens of thousands of pages of regulations is a complete non-starter. Everything begins with repeal.&#8221; <\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">That is why the vote in the House last week to repeal Obamacare was not symbolic&#8211;it was real.&nbsp; Now the idea is to get Senators on the record as to whether or not they are willing to try to get healthcare reform right.&nbsp; What was passed last year was a tribute to special interests and pork with very little regard for the consumers of health care.&nbsp; Hopefully this Congress can put together something much less complicated and much better.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Friday, Charles Krauthammer posted a column at the Washington Post&nbsp;about the repeal of Obamacare.&nbsp; He points out that the Congressional Budget Office numbers the Democrats are using to say that repealing Obamacare will increase the deficit actually say something &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=2609\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2609","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2609","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2609"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2609\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2609"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2609"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2609"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}