{"id":24409,"date":"2014-11-23T18:58:56","date_gmt":"2014-11-23T23:58:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=24409"},"modified":"2014-11-23T18:58:56","modified_gmt":"2014-11-23T23:58:56","slug":"reading-between-the-lines-on-benghazi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=24409","title":{"rendered":"Reading Between The Lines On Benghazi"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Friday, the official report on Benghazi<\/a> was released by the House Intelligence Committee<\/a>. On Saturday, Hot Air<\/a> posted an article about the report. There is no obvious smoking gun in the report, but there are some interesting statements.<\/p>\n

The article reports:<\/p>\n

The media interpretation of the findings is also flatly contradictory in places. Take for example this declaration of a lack of any culpability. (Emphasis added.)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure<\/a><\/em><\/span>, no delay in sending a CIA<\/a> rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya<\/a> to Syria.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The next paragraph in the report states:<\/p>\n

So, nothing to see here. Move along. Except for one problem. The coverage also seeks to make it clear that Susan Rice<\/a> couldn\u2019t possibly be to blame for her blatantly false portrayals of the attack on the Sunday morning shows. Watch what happens to the analysis on this score.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the immediate aftermath of the attack, intelligence about who carried it out and why was contradictory, the report found. That led Susan Rice, then U.S. ambassador to the United Nations<\/a>, to inaccurately assert that the attack had evolved from a protest, when in fact there had been no protest. But it was intelligence analysts, not political appointees, who made the wrong call<\/span><\/em>, the committee found. The report did not conclude that Rice or any other government official acted in bad faith or intentionally misled the American people.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The writer of the article asks the obvious question:<\/p>\n

Keep in mind, these are not two paragraphs separated by miles of text. They\u2019re back to back<\/em>. And somehow, in the space of four sentences, we went from there was no intelligence failure<\/em> to reading it was intelligence analysts\u2026 who made the wrong call<\/em>. If you\u2019re making the wrong call<\/em> \u2013 particularly one which turned out to be so incredibly far off base \u2013 then that sounds like an intelligence failure to me.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Also rather stunning is the way that a complete vindication of the White House<\/a> is somehow constructed out of these conclusions. Susan Rice was either lying or she was wrong. Neither possibility paints the administration in a very competent light. And if there was a failure of intelligence, how does that clear the White House? The last time I checked the CIA reports to the Director of Intelligence who, in turn, reports directly to the President\u2026 or has that changed? A better translation of this hopeful sounding article would be to say that the report cleared the political arm of Obama\u2019s team<\/em> of any wrongdoing, while allowing him to throw his intelligence team under the bus.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Unfortunately, we will probably never know who messed up in the Benghazi tragedy. So much for government transparency.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On Friday, the official report on Benghazi was released by the House Intelligence Committee. On Saturday, Hot Air posted an article about the report. There is no obvious smoking gun in the report, but there are some interesting statements. The … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3947,659,4191,1178,4378,211],"class_list":["post-24409","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-benghazi","tag-central-intelligence-agency","tag-susan-rice","tag-united-states-department-of-state","tag-united-states-house-permanent-select-committee-on-intelligence","tag-white-house"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24409","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=24409"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24409\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24410,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24409\/revisions\/24410"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=24409"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=24409"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=24409"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}