{"id":23393,"date":"2014-07-25T15:42:38","date_gmt":"2014-07-25T19:42:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=23393"},"modified":"2014-07-25T15:42:38","modified_gmt":"2014-07-25T19:42:38","slug":"the-internal-revenue-service-and-obamacare","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=23393","title":{"rendered":"The Internal Revenue Service And ObamaCare"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday Kim Strassel posted an article at the <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"The Wall Street Journal\" href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"homepage\">Wall Street Journal<\/a> entitled &#8220;The <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia\">ObamaCare<\/a>&#8211;<a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Internal Revenue Service\" href=\"http:\/\/www.irs.gov\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"homepage\">IRS<\/a> Nexus.&#8221; It is subscriber content, but if you google the title, you can read the entire article.<\/p>\n<p>The article details the role of the IRS in the implementation of ObamaCare and the questionable steps the agency has taken in that implementation.<\/p>\n<p>The article reports:<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15px; padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>The <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_District_of_Columbia_Circuit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"wikipedia\">D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals<\/a> ruled in <em>Halbig <\/em>that the administration had illegally provided <span class=\"mandelbrot_refrag\"><a class=\"mandelbrot_refrag\" href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/public\/page\/health-law-rollout.html?lc=int_mb_1001\" data-ls-seen=\"1\">ObamaCare<\/a><\/span> subsidies in 36 insurance exchanges run by the federal government. Yet it wasn&#8217;t the &#8220;administration&#8221; as a whole that issued the lawless subsidy gift. It was the administration acting through its new, favorite enforcer: the IRS.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15px; padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>And it was entirely political. <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Democratic Party (United States)\" href=\"http:\/\/www.democrats.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"homepage\">Democrats<\/a> needed those subsidies. The party had assumed that dangling subsidies before the states would induce them to set up exchanges. When dozens instead refused, the <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"White House\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=38.8976694444,-77.03655&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=38.8976694444,-77.03655 (White%20House)&amp;t=h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"geolocation\">White House<\/a> was faced with the prospect that citizens in 36 states\u2014two-thirds of the country\u2014would be exposed to the full cost of ObamaCare&#8217;s overpriced insurance. The backlash would have been horrific, potentially forcing Democrats to reopen the law, or even costing <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Barack Obama\" href=\"http:\/\/www.barackobama.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"homepage\">President Obama<\/a> re-election.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15px; padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>The White House viewed it as imperative, therefore, that IRS bureaucrats ignore the law&#8217;s text and come up with a politically helpful rule. The evidence shows that career officials at the IRS did indeed do as <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"United States Department of the Treasury\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=38.8983333333,-77.0341666667&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=38.8983333333,-77.0341666667 (United%20States%20Department%20of%20the%20Treasury)&amp;t=h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"geolocation\">Treasury Department<\/a> and Health and Human Services Department officials told them. This, despite the fact that the IRS is supposed to be insulated from political meddling.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15px;\">It gets worse. The article tells us that in late summer of 2010, after ObamaCare was signed into law, the IRS assembled a working group\u2014made up of career IRS and Treasury employees\u2014to develop regulations around ObamaCare subsidies. The early group followed the text of the law and declared that subsidies were for exchanges established by <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"United States\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=38.8833333333,-77.0166666667&amp;spn=10.0,10.0&amp;q=38.8833333333,-77.0166666667 (United%20States)&amp;t=h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"geolocation\">the States<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15px;\">The article explains what happened next:<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15px; padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>Yet in March 2011, Emily McMahon, the acting assistant secretary for tax policy at the Treasury Department (a political hire), saw a news article that noted a growing legal focus on the meaning of that text. She forwarded it to the working group, which in turn decided to elevate the issue\u2014according to <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"United States Congress\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=38.8897222222,-77.0088888889&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=38.8897222222,-77.0088888889 (United%20States%20Congress)&amp;t=h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"geolocation\">Congress&#8217;s<\/a> report\u2014to &#8220;senior IRS and Treasury officials.&#8221; The office of the IRS chief counsel\u2014one of two positions appointed by the president\u2014drafted a memo telling the group that it should read the text to mean that everyone, in every exchange, got subsidies. At some point between March 10 and March 15, 2011, the reference to &#8220;Exchanges established by the State&#8221; disappeared from the draft rule.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15px; padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>&#8230;To summarize: The IRS (famed for nitpicking and prosecuting the tax law), chose to authorize hundreds of billions of illegal subsidies without having performed a smidgen of legal due diligence, and did so at the direction of political taskmasters. The agency&#8217;s actions provided aid and comfort to elected Democrats, even as it disenfranchised millions of Americans who voted in their states to reject state-run exchanges. And Treasury knows how ugly this looks, which is why it initially stonewalled Congress in its investigation\u2014at first refusing to give documents to investigators, and redacting large portions of the information.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: 15px;\">Congratulations. We have become a banana republic. The law is what the political party in power says it is. The IRS is an organization to be used to silence and suppress political opposition. The use of the IRS for political purposes was the second article in the Articles of Impeachment against Richard Nixon.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday Kim Strassel posted an article at the Wall Street Journal entitled &#8220;The ObamaCare&#8211;IRS Nexus.&#8221; It is subscriber content, but if you google the title, you can read the entire article. The article details the role of the IRS in &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=23393\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[853,284,678,7,134,4872,238,211],"class_list":["post-23393","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-democrats","tag-internal-revenue-service","tag-irs","tag-obamacare","tag-patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act","tag-united-states-court-of-appeals-for-the-district-of-columbia-circuit","tag-wall-street-journal","tag-white-house"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23393","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=23393"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23393\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23394,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23393\/revisions\/23394"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=23393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=23393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=23393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}