{"id":19812,"date":"2013-07-23T07:49:16","date_gmt":"2013-07-23T11:49:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=19812"},"modified":"2013-07-23T07:49:17","modified_gmt":"2013-07-23T11:49:17","slug":"at-some-point-the-republicans-need-to-realize-that-they-are-not-playing-tiddlywinks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=19812","title":{"rendered":"At Some Point The Republicans Need To Realize That They Are Not Playing TiddlyWinks"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yesterday National Review Online<\/a> posted an article about the House Oversight Committee<\/a> hearings on the Internal Revenue Service<\/a> last week. The article focused on the attacks on Inspector General<\/a> (IG) J. Russell George. This is the political equivalent of a defense lawyer attacking the District Attorney<\/a> because he does not want to deal with the evidence against his client.<\/p>\n

I am a registered Republican only because there is no real Conservative Party<\/a> at this time. Generally I can go along with most of what the Republicans do, but if they don’t wake up and smell the coffee, they will be permanently known as the Stupid Party.<\/p>\n

The attacks on the IG were designed to change the subject. Unless some Republicans start speaking up, the attacks will have served their purpose.<\/p>\n

Scott Johnson at Power Line<\/a> also posted an article about last week’s hearings. In his article he pointed out that none of the mainstream reported that the attack on the IG was unwarranted and false.<\/p>\n

The Democrats<\/a>‘ claim is that the IG neglected to mention that progressive groups were targeted as well as Tea Party groups. That probably has something to do with the fact that the claim is false.<\/p>\n

The story at National Review states:<\/p>\n

The accusations contradict the obvious facts: The 14 BOLO lists Levin released, though they contain the term \u201cProgressive,\u201d instruct IRS screeners to treat the applications of progressive organizations differently from those of tea-party groups. In George\u2019s words, the \u201cProgressive\u201d entry \u201cdid not include instructions on how to refer cases that met the criteria,\u201d whereas tea-party cases were automatically sent to higher-ups in the agency for coordination with Washington, D.C. The \u201cOccupy\u201d entry to which Cummings refers instructs screeners to send cases to the same group processing tea-party applications. The head of that group, though, told Congress<\/a> that when she received applications from liberal groups, she sent them back to \u201cgeneral inventory.\u201d George on Thursday told the House panel that, of the 298 cases scrutinized for political activity, zero fell under the \u201cOccupy\u201d rubric. The \u201cProgressive\u201d and \u201cOccupy\u201d listings may be problematic \u2014 it is not clear why the terms were added to the list \u2014 but the political activity of liberal groups simply was not put under the microscope.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The use of the IRS for political purposes is wrong. It is also dangerous to our republic. It becomes even more dangerous with all the information the IRS will be overseeing under ObamaCare<\/a>. What was done with the targeting of Tea Party groups is a threat to our republic. If this abuse continues, our elections will be neither free nor fair.<\/p>\n

\"Enhanced<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yesterday National Review Online posted an article about the House Oversight Committee hearings on the Internal Revenue Service last week. The article focused on the attacks on Inspector General (IG) J. Russell George. This is the political equivalent of a … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[5797,219,1619,284,911,365,1108,189],"class_list":["post-19812","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-conservative","tag-democratic","tag-inspector-general","tag-internal-revenue-service","tag-national-review","tag-republicans","tag-tea","tag-united-states-house-committee-on-oversight-and-government-reform"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19812","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19812"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19812\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19814,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19812\/revisions\/19814"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19812"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}