The article reports:<\/p>\n
While signing the state\u2019s $32.5 billion budget yesterday, Patrick rejected an outside section containing the welfare benefits<\/a> card reforms that had been hammered out with bi-partisan support in the House and Senate \u2014 an effort spearheaded by House Speaker Robert DeLeo (D-Winthrop).<\/strong><\/p>\n The reforms would have banned\u00a0EBT buys of guns, porn, tattoos, jewelry and manicures. He allowed the banning of EBT cards in tattoo parlors, gun shops, casinos, cruise ships, strip clubs and adult entertainment centers, saying the independent EBT Card Commission had ruled out the idea of banning specific products \u201cfor reasons of feasibility, enforceability (and) cost.\u201d<\/p>\n The purpose of the EBT card is to allow people in need to provide food and necessities to themselves and their families. To allow these cards to be used for non-necessities is unfair to the taxpayers who may be going without these luxuries in order to pay their tax bills!<\/p>\n No, this is not an article about President Obama and healthcare–it is an article about the misuse of the cards given to welfare recipients. In Massachusetts we have what are called EBT cards, which allow people collecting welfare to purchase … Continue reading ![\"Enhanced](\"http:\/\/img.zemanta.com\/zemified_e.png?x-id=8f25a39c-dce3-4fbc-9eb6-7220caf14923\")
<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"