{"id":13902,"date":"2012-05-15T06:37:17","date_gmt":"2012-05-15T10:37:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=13902"},"modified":"2012-05-15T06:37:17","modified_gmt":"2012-05-15T10:37:17","slug":"what-would-lost-mean","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=13902","title":{"rendered":"What Would LOST Mean ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Frank Gaffney posted an article at <a href=\"http:\/\/townhall.com\/columnists\/frankgaffney\/2012\/05\/14\/false_flag_operation_on_lost\/page\/full\/\">Townhall.com<\/a>\u00a0about the <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/United_Nations_Convention_on_the_Law_of_the_Sea\" rel=\"wikipedia\" target=\"_blank\">Law Of The Sea Treaty<\/a> (LOST) which may come up in\u00a0the lame-duck session of the <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"United States Senate\" href=\"http:\/\/www.senate.gov\/\" rel=\"homepage\" target=\"_blank\">Senate<\/a> at the end of the year. The treaty essentially will give the United Nations control over all waterways and set up a justice system\u00a0at the United Nations that all nations would be under. In a few words, it is a direct threat to American sovereignty.<\/p>\n<p>The article reports:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>First, as Senator Lott once warned, ratification of LOST would commit the United States to submit to mandatory <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Dispute resolution\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dispute_resolution\" rel=\"wikipedia\" target=\"_blank\">dispute resolution<\/a> with respect to U.S. military and industrial operations. While LOST proponents argue that the United States will choose available <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Arbitration\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Arbitration\" rel=\"wikipedia\" target=\"_blank\">arbitration<\/a> mechanisms to avoid legal decisions from the <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"International Court of Justice\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=52.0866,4.2955&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=52.0866,4.2955 (International%20Court%20of%20Justice)&amp;t=h\" rel=\"geolocation\" target=\"_blank\">International Court of Justice (ICJ)<\/a> or the <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=53.5511111111,9.85083333333&amp;spn=0.01,0.01&amp;q=53.5511111111,9.85083333333 (International%20Tribunal%20for%20the%20Law%20of%20the%20Sea)&amp;t=h\" rel=\"geolocation\" target=\"_blank\">International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea<\/a> (ITLOS), such arbitration panels are no-less perilous for U.S. interests as the decisive, &#8220;swing&#8221; arbiters would be appointed by generally unfriendly UN-affiliated bureaucrats. The arbitration panels can also be relied upon to look to rulings by the ICJ or ITLOS to inform their own decisions.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>Furthermore, while there is a LOST provision exempting &#8220;military activity&#8221; from such dispute resolution mechanisms, the Treaty makes no attempt to define &#8220;military activity,&#8221; virtually guaranteeing that such matters will be litigated &#8211; in all likelihood to our detriment &#8211; before one or another of LOST&#8217;s arbitration mechanisms. And the rulings of such arbitrators cannot be appealed.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t think this is what our founding fathers had in mind.<\/p>\n<p>The article concludes:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>Of particular concern is the fact that LOST creates an international taxation regime. It does so by empowering the <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"International Seabed Authority\" href=\"http:\/\/maps.google.com\/maps?ll=17.964767531,-76.791708055&amp;spn=1.0,1.0&amp;q=17.964767531,-76.791708055 (International%20Seabed%20Authority)&amp;t=h\" rel=\"geolocation\" target=\"_blank\">International Seabed Authority<\/a> (ISA) to tax Americans for the purposes of meeting its ownadministrative costs and of globally redistributing revenue derived from the exploitation of seabed resources.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>It is a travesty to portray atreaty with such clearly sovereignty-sapping provisions as an enhancement to our national sovereignty. LOST should be rejected this time &#8211; as <a class=\"zem_slink\" title=\"Ronald Reagan\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rottentomatoes.com\/celebrity\/ronald_reagan\" rel=\"rottentomatoes\" target=\"_blank\">President Ronald Reagan<\/a> did thirty years ago and as Senator Lott urged twenty-five years later.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The UN has shown a definite lack of wisdom in selecting members of its Human Rights Commission, do we really want them to exercise any control over America?<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<div class=\"zemanta-pixie\" style=\"margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;\"><a class=\"zemanta-pixie-a\" title=\"Enhanced by Zemanta\" href=\"http:\/\/www.zemanta.com\/?px\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"zemanta-pixie-img\" style=\"float: right; border-style: none;\" src=\"http:\/\/img.zemanta.com\/zemified_e.png?x-id=20e1149b-3caf-4a9d-884b-4d10bd697c9e\" alt=\"Enhanced by Zemanta\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Frank Gaffney posted an article at Townhall.com\u00a0about the Law Of The Sea Treaty (LOST) which may come up in\u00a0the lame-duck session of the Senate at the end of the year. The treaty essentially will give the United Nations control over &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=13902\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3015,3017,3016,1974,711,223,3014,285],"class_list":["post-13902","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-international-court-of-justice","tag-international-seabed-authority","tag-international-tribunal-for-the-law-of-the-sea","tag-ronald-reagan","tag-senate","tag-united-nations","tag-united-nations-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea","tag-united-states"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13902"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13902\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13903,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13902\/revisions\/13903"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}