{"id":13129,"date":"2012-04-06T05:58:13","date_gmt":"2012-04-06T09:58:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=13129"},"modified":"2012-04-06T05:58:13","modified_gmt":"2012-04-06T09:58:13","slug":"actions-speak-louder-than-words","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=13129","title":{"rendered":"Actions Speak Louder Than Words"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blog.american.com\/2012\/04\/obamas-supreme-hypocrisy\/\">The American<\/a>\u00a0(the online magazine of the American Enterprise Institute) posted an article yesterday by Marc Theissen about some recent actions by President Obama regarding the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p>The article reported some events this week in a Boston, Massachusetts, court:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>On Wednesday, oral arguments took place over another law passed by a \u201cstrong majority of a democratically elected Congress\u201d \u2014 the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Indeed, both cases feature the same lawyer \u2014 former solicitor general Paul Clement \u2014 who delivered the argument against Obamacare before the Supreme Court last week and in defense of DOMA before the U.S.\u00a0Court of Appeals for the First Circuit\u00a0this week.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>Why is Clement, and not the Justice Department, defending this law in federal court? Because the Obama administration announced last year that it had decided that it would no longer defend DOMA in court. Quite the opposite, the Justice Department is actively urging district courts around the country to\u00a0\u2026 you guessed it \u2026 overturn this law.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The irony here is that DOMA was passed by a &#8220;strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.&#8221; In the House the vote was 342-67, and in the Senate the vote was 85-14. That actually <em>is <\/em>a strong majority.<\/p>\n<p>Last year in a letter to Speaker of the House John Boehner, Attorney General Eric Holder stated:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>After careful consideration, including a review of my recommendation, the President has concluded that given a number of factors, including a documented history of discrimination, classifications based on sexual orientation should be subject to a more heightened standard of scrutiny. The President has also concluded that Section 3 of DOMA, as applied to legally married same-sex couples, fails to meet that standard and is therefore unconstitutional. Given that conclusion, the President has instructed the Department not to defend the statute in such cases. I fully concur with the President\u2019s determination.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>So the President and the Attorney General have decided only to uphold those laws that they happen to agree with.<\/p>\n<p>Has anyone in this administration read the U. S. Constitution?<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">\u00a0<\/p>\n<div class=\"zemanta-pixie\" style=\"margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;\"><a class=\"zemanta-pixie-a\" title=\"Enhanced by Zemanta\" href=\"http:\/\/www.zemanta.com\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"zemanta-pixie-img\" style=\"float: right; border-style: none;\" src=\"http:\/\/img.zemanta.com\/zemified_e.png?x-id=03b675e7-59b1-43f7-ab6f-6f63c39eb259\" alt=\"Enhanced by Zemanta\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The American\u00a0(the online magazine of the American Enterprise Institute) posted an article yesterday by Marc Theissen about some recent actions by President Obama regarding the Supreme Court. The article reported some events this week in a Boston, Massachusetts, court: On &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=13129\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[411,785,2663,298,142,2567,274,2664],"class_list":["post-13129","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-american-enterprise-institute","tag-boston","tag-defense-of-marriage-act","tag-john-boehner","tag-massachusetts","tag-paul-clement","tag-supreme-court","tag-united-states-court-of-appeals-for-the-first-circuit"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13129","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13129"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13129\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13130,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13129\/revisions\/13130"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13129"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13129"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13129"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}