{"id":11842,"date":"2012-01-26T14:47:57","date_gmt":"2012-01-26T19:47:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=11842"},"modified":"2012-01-26T14:48:26","modified_gmt":"2012-01-26T19:48:26","slug":"something-that-wasnt-mentioned-in-the-state-of-the-union-speech","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=11842","title":{"rendered":"Something That Wasn&#8217;t Mentioned In The State Of The Union Speech"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I haven&#8217;t written anything about the State of the Union speech because I thought it was a political exercise. This is the &#8216;silly season&#8217; and truth is a rare commodity in political speeches right now (not that it is always there in other times). However, the <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052970203806504577183250095478594.html?mod=WSJ_hp_mostpop_read\">Wall Street Journal<\/a> posted an editorial today that makes some very good points.<\/p>\n<p>This is the chart from the editorial:<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/si.wsj.net\/public\/resources\/images\/ED-AO822_1buffe_D_20120125191803.jpg\" alt=\"1buffettrule\" width=\"262\" height=\"269\" border=\"0\" hspace=\"0\" \/><\/p>\n<p>As you can see, the federal tax rate on long-term capital gains has varied a lot over the years. The article points out the fallacy of the &#8220;Buffett Rule&#8221; that President Obama is proposing\u00a0which would\u00a0make wealthy Americans give more of their money to the government. The Congressional Budget Office reports that the effective income tax rate of the richest 1% is actually about 29.5%. That is the rate you come up with when you include all federal taxes&#8211;such as the distribution of corporate taxes. That is about twice the 15.1% rate paid by middle-class families.<\/p>\n<p>Investment income has already been taxed once. There is no reason to tax it again unless you are trying to redistribute wealth.<\/p>\n<p>The article points out:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>As the nearby chart shows, the rate has never since risen above 28%, and the last time it moved that high was in 1986 as part of the Reagan-Rostenkowski tax reform that also cut the top marginal income tax rate to 28% from 50%. With income-tax rates so low, a differential was arguably less necessary\u2014though it&#8217;s worth noting that capital gains revenues fell dramatically after that rate increase.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>A decade later Bill Clinton agreed to cut the rate back to 20% as part of the balanced-budget deal with Newt Gingrich. Capital gains revenues soared, helping to balance the federal budget. Nearly every study estimates that the revenue-maximizing tax rate from the capital gains tax is between 15% and 28%. Doug Holtz-Eakin, the former director of the Congressional Budget Office, says that a 30% tax rate &#8220;is almost surely above the rate that maximizes tax revenues.&#8221; So it&#8217;s likely the Buffett trick would lose revenue for the government.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>So if we are in a time of federal deficits, why would you change the tax code in a way that would lose revenue for the government? Unless you are using the tax code to redistribute wealth, it makes no sense.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"zemanta-pixie\" style=\"margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;\"><a class=\"zemanta-pixie-a\" title=\"Enhanced by Zemanta\" href=\"http:\/\/www.zemanta.com\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"zemanta-pixie-img\" style=\"float: right; border-style: none;\" src=\"http:\/\/img.zemanta.com\/zemified_e.png?x-id=f7b7e43b-62e6-4e50-920f-659b47f1d482\" alt=\"Enhanced by Zemanta\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I haven&#8217;t written anything about the State of the Union speech because I thought it was a political exercise. This is the &#8216;silly season&#8217; and truth is a rare commodity in political speeches right now (not that it is always &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/?p=11842\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[97,1948,580,1452,280,1947,238],"class_list":["post-11842","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-barack-obama","tag-buffett-rule","tag-congressional-budget-office","tag-redistribution-of-wealth","tag-tax","tag-tax-rate","tag-wall-street-journal"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11842","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11842"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11842\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11849,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11842\/revisions\/11849"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11842"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11842"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rightwinggranny.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11842"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}