On Saturday, MSNBC posted an article about the new immigration law just passed in Arizona. The article states:
"It also requires local police officers to question people about their immigration status if there is reason to suspect they are illegal immigrants; allows lawsuits against government agencies that hinder enforcement of immigration laws; and makes it illegal to hire illegal immigrants for day labor or knowingly transport them.
"The law sends "a clear message that Arizona is unfriendly to undocumented aliens," said Peter Spiro, a Temple University law professor and author of the book "Beyond Citizenship: American Identity After Globalization.""
This is ridiculous. Why shouldn't Arizona be unfriendly to undocumented (illegal) aliens? What part of illegal does Professor Spiro not understand? Is illegal only illegal if he says so?
One of the arguments against the new bill is that it requires legal aliens (or recent citizens) to have their identification papers on them at all times. Supposedly that is the beginning of a totalitarian state. Well, wait a minute. This is a link to A Guide for New Immigrants put out by the United States government. On page 8 of this guide is the statement:
As a permanent resident, it is your responsibility to:
Carry proof of your permanent resident status at all times.
This is directly copied from the New Immigrants guide:
Permanent residents are issued a valid Permanent Resident
Card (Form I-551) as proof of their legal status in
the United States. Some people call this a "Green Card."
If you are a permanent resident who is 18 years or
older, you must carry proof of your immigration status.
You must show it to an immigration officer if asked for
it.Your card is valid for 10 years and must be renewed
before it expires.You should file Form I-90 to replace or
renew your Permanent Resident Card.You can get this
form at http://www.uscis.gov or by calling the USCIS
Forms Line. There is a fee to file Form I-90.
I think we need to enforce our own laws.
The manufacturers of Rolex watches apperceive that Tag Heuer replica watches their latest watches are getting replicated and to abstain accident of business they accomplish attenuate and accomplished changes to their ambit of watches.If you had anticipation that these Swiss replica watches are not exact replicas of the originals, you are barking up the amiss tree. The craftsmen who accomplish these watches accord added absorption to ensure that the user of their Swiss replica watches get the best in craftsmanship. They see to it that the end user gets something that cannot be differentiated from the aboriginal Swiss watches. What are you cat-and-mouse for then? If you are gluttonous authentic amount for your money and at the aforementioned time ambition to backpack a actualization account on your hand, you charge to abrasion Swiss replica watches. If you are one of them who accept that just one acceptable affair is not enough, again go advanced and splurge your money in a amount of Swiss replica watches. This is a cat and abrasion bold and as anon as changes are fabricated in the original, a few down the line, they are congenital in the Swiss replica watches as well. So what does one angle to accretion if they are purchasing Swiss replica watches? For one the budgetary accumulation is obvious. Afar from that there is the accord of apperception too. If anyone is mugged and their aboriginal Swiss watch is burgled, they accept a lot to anticipate about. Not so for those Replica watches uk who accept Swiss replica watches on them. They can simple go out and acquirement addition Swiss replica watches the next day.